IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26461-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors

Author

Listed:
  • András Tálas

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Semmelweis University)

  • Dorottya A. Simon

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Gene Design Ltd.)

  • Péter I. Kulcsár

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Semmelweis University
    Biospiral-2006 Ltd.)

  • Éva Varga

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    University of Szeged)

  • Sarah L. Krausz

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Semmelweis University)

  • Ervin Welker

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Biological Research Centre)

Abstract

Adenine and cytosine base editors (ABE, CBE) allow for precision genome engineering. Here, Base Editor Activity Reporter (BEAR), a plasmid-based fluorescent tool is introduced, which can be applied to report on ABE and CBE editing in a virtually unrestricted sequence context or to label base edited cells for enrichment. Using BEAR-enrichment, we increase the yield of base editing performed by nuclease inactive base editors to the level of the nickase versions while maintaining significantly lower indel background. Furthermore, by exploiting the semi-high-throughput potential of BEAR, we examine whether increased fidelity SpCas9 variants can be used to decrease SpCas9-dependent off-target effects of ABE and CBE. Comparing them on the same target sets reveals that CBE remains active on sequences, where increased fidelity mutations and/or mismatches decrease the activity of ABE. Our results suggest that the deaminase domain of ABE is less effective to act on rather transiently separated target DNA strands, than that of CBE explaining its lower mismatch tolerance.

Suggested Citation

  • András Tálas & Dorottya A. Simon & Péter I. Kulcsár & Éva Varga & Sarah L. Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2021. "BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26461-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26461-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26461-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26461-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jungjoon K. Lee & Euihwan Jeong & Joonsun Lee & Minhee Jung & Eunji Shin & Young-hoon Kim & Kangin Lee & Inyoung Jung & Daesik Kim & Seokjoong Kim & Jin-Soo Kim, 2018. "Directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 to increase its specificity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Samuel H. Sternberg & Benjamin LaFrance & Matias Kaplan & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2015. "Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7576), pages 110-113, November.
    3. Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Vikram Pattanayak & Michelle S. Prew & Shengdar Q. Tsai & Nhu T. Nguyen & Zongli Zheng & J. Keith Joung, 2016. "High-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 490-495, January.
    4. Junjie Tan & Fei Zhang & Daniel Karcher & Ralph Bock, 2019. "Engineering of high-precision base editors for site-specific single nucleotide replacement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Grégoire Cullot & Julian Boutin & Jérôme Toutain & Florence Prat & Perrine Pennamen & Caroline Rooryck & Martin Teichmann & Emilie Rousseau & Isabelle Lamrissi-Garcia & Véronique Guyonnet-Duperat & Al, 2019. "CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Samuel H. Sternberg & Sy Redding & Martin Jinek & Eric C. Greene & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2014. "DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9," Nature, Nature, vol. 507(7490), pages 62-67, March.
    7. Andrew V. Anzalone & Peyton B. Randolph & Jessie R. Davis & Alexander A. Sousa & Luke W. Koblan & Jonathan M. Levy & Peter J. Chen & Christopher Wilson & Gregory A. Newby & Aditya Raguram & David R. L, 2019. "Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7785), pages 149-157, December.
    8. Alexis C. Komor & Yongjoo B. Kim & Michael S. Packer & John A. Zuris & David R. Liu, 2016. "Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 420-424, May.
    9. Janice S. Chen & Yavuz S. Dagdas & Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Moira M. Welch & Alexander A. Sousa & Lucas B. Harrington & Samuel H. Sternberg & J. Keith Joung & Ahmet Yildiz & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2017. "Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 targeting accuracy," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 407-410, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Eszter Tóth & Zsófia Rakvács & Zsuzsa Bartos & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ágnes Welker & Vanessza Laura Végi & Krisztina Huszár & Ervin Welker, 2023. "A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Eszter Tóth & Zsófia Rakvács & Zsuzsa Bartos & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ágnes Welker & Vanessza Laura Végi & Krisztina Huszár & Ervin Welker, 2023. "A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Jian Wang & Ke Wang & Zhe Deng & Zhiyu Zhong & Guo Sun & Qing Mei & Fuling Zhou & Zixin Deng & Yuhui Sun, 2024. "Engineered cytosine base editor enabling broad-scope and high-fidelity gene editing in Streptomyces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2022. "SuperFi-Cas9 exhibits remarkable fidelity but severely reduced activity yet works effectively with ABE8e," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Burcu Bestas & Sandra Wimberger & Dmitrii Degtev & Alexandra Madsen & Antje K. Rottner & Fredrik Karlsson & Sergey Naumenko & Megan Callahan & Julia Liz Touza & Margherita Francescatto & Carl Ivar Möl, 2023. "A Type II-B Cas9 nuclease with minimized off-targets and reduced chromosomal translocations in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Yi-Li Feng & Qian Liu & Ruo-Dan Chen & Si-Cheng Liu & Zhi-Cheng Huang & Kun-Ming Liu & Xiao-Ying Yang & An-Yong Xie, 2022. "DNA nicks induce mutational signatures associated with BRCA1 deficiency," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Michael Kosicki & Felicity Allen & Frances Steward & Kärt Tomberg & Yangyang Pan & Allan Bradley, 2022. "Cas9-induced large deletions and small indels are controlled in a convergent fashion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Jianli Tao & Daniel E. Bauer & Roberto Chiarle, 2023. "Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Sundaram Acharya & Asgar Hussain Ansari & Prosad Kumar Das & Seiichi Hirano & Meghali Aich & Riya Rauthan & Sudipta Mahato & Savitri Maddileti & Sajal Sarkar & Manoj Kumar & Rhythm Phutela & Sneha Gul, 2024. "PAM-flexible Engineered FnCas9 variants for robust and ultra-precise genome editing and diagnostics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Lin Zhao & Sabrina R. T. Koseki & Rachel A. Silverstein & Nadia Amrani & Christina Peng & Christian Kramme & Natasha Savic & Martin Pacesa & Tomás C. Rodríguez & Teodora Stan & Emma Tysinger & Lauren , 2023. "PAM-flexible genome editing with an engineered chimeric Cas9," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Giulia I. Corsi & Kunli Qu & Ferhat Alkan & Xiaoguang Pan & Yonglun Luo & Jan Gorodkin, 2022. "CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Zsolt Bodai & Alena L. Bishop & Valentino M. Gantz & Alexis C. Komor, 2022. "Targeting double-strand break indel byproducts with secondary guide RNAs improves Cas9 HDR-mediated genome editing efficiencies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Yanbo Wang & W. Taylor Cottle & Haobo Wang & Momcilo Gavrilov & Roger S. Zou & Minh-Tam Pham & Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian & Scott Bailey & Taekjip Ha, 2022. "Achieving single nucleotide sensitivity in direct hybridization genome imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Duško Lainšček & Vida Forstnerič & Veronika Mikolič & Špela Malenšek & Peter Pečan & Mojca Benčina & Matjaž Sever & Helena Podgornik & Roman Jerala, 2022. "Coiled-coil heterodimer-based recruitment of an exonuclease to CRISPR/Cas for enhanced gene editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Marius Rutkauskas & Inga Songailiene & Patrick Irmisch & Felix E. Kemmerich & Tomas Sinkunas & Virginijus Siksnys & Ralf Seidel, 2022. "A quantitative model for the dynamics of target recognition and off-target rejection by the CRISPR-Cas Cascade complex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Maarten H. Geurts & Shashank Gandhi & Matteo G. Boretto & Ninouk Akkerman & Lucca L. M. Derks & Gijs Son & Martina Celotti & Sarina Harshuk-Shabso & Flavia Peci & Harry Begthel & Delilah Hendriks & Pa, 2023. "One-step generation of tumor models by base editor multiplexing in adult stem cell-derived organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Afsaneh Sadremomtaz & Robert F. Glass & Jorge Eduardo Guerrero & Dennis R. LaJeunesse & Eric A. Josephs & Reza Zadegan, 2023. "Digital data storage on DNA tape using CRISPR base editors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Jianli Tao & Qi Wang & Carlos Mendez-Dorantes & Kathleen H. Burns & Roberto Chiarle, 2022. "Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Behrouz Eslami-Mossallam & Misha Klein & Constantijn V. D. Smagt & Koen V. D. Sanden & Stephen K. Jones & John A. Hawkins & Ilya J. Finkelstein & Martin Depken, 2022. "A kinetic model predicts SpCas9 activity, improves off-target classification, and reveals the physical basis of targeting fidelity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Jianhang Yin & Rusen Lu & Changchang Xin & Yuhong Wang & Xinyu Ling & Dong Li & Weiwei Zhang & Mengzhu Liu & Wutao Xie & Lingyun Kong & Wen Si & Ping Wei & Bingbing Xiao & Hsiang-Ying Lee & Tao Liu & , 2022. "Cas9 exo-endonuclease eliminates chromosomal translocations during genome editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Daphne Collias & Elena Vialetto & Jiaqi Yu & Khoa Co & Éva d. H. Almási & Ann-Sophie Rüttiger & Tatjana Achmedov & Till Strowig & Chase L. Beisel, 2023. "Systematically attenuating DNA targeting enables CRISPR-driven editing in bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26461-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.