IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v13y2018i3p265-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Values as the Basis for Business Excellence

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Malbasic

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Bruno Beluzic

    (Vindija Ltd, Croatia)

  • Nikolina Posaric

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Organizational values play an increasingly important role in contemporary organizations – they intertwine all segments of business and greatly affect the direction of the organization’s business strategy. The purpose of this paper is to note that the organizational values that permeate all business segments under modern business conditions form the foundation for the excellence of business organizations. In this regard, we first introduce Kanji’s Business Excellence Measurement System (KBEMS) as a starting point for understanding business excellence. According to KBEMS, business excellence is determined by measuring the satisfaction level of customers, employees and other stakeholders to obtain a comprehensive assessment of organizational performance. Specifically, KBEMS consists of two main aspects-leadership and organizational values. In the central part of the paper, we present a case study of Yum! Brands, one of the world’s largest fast food companies. Particular emphasis is placed on the detailed presentation and explanation of the basic organizational values of Yum! Brands Company based on two sources of information-espoused values listed on the official web site of the company and various external sources of information from which external stakeholders assess the company’s value orientation. Finally, we analyzed the organizational values of Yum! Brands from the perspective of KBEMS. This case study shows that organizational values are the real foundation for business excellence in Yum! Brands. In this context, we considered the relationship between organizational values and key components of KBEMS. This study can therefore serve as an example of putting organizational values into the function of increasing organizational performance, with the ultimate goal of creating organizational excellence.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Malbasic & Bruno Beluzic & Nikolina Posaric, 2018. "Organizational Values as the Basis for Business Excellence," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(3), pages 265-279.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:265-279
    DOI: 10.26493/1854-4231.13.265-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/1854-4231/13.265-279.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/1854-4231.13.265-279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Malbašić & Carlos Rey & Vojko Potočan, 2015. "Balanced Organizational Values: From Theory to Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 437-446, August.
    2. Pablo Cardona & Carlos Rey, 2022. "Management by Missions," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-030-83780-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter G. Dominick & Dimitra Iordanoglou & Gregory Prastacos & Richard R. Reilly, 2021. "Espoused Values of the “Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For”: Essential Themes and Implementation Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 69-88, September.
    2. Ivan Malbasic & Carlos Rey & Nikolina Posaric, 2018. "Congruence Between Personal And Organizational Mission: The Role Of Balanced Organizational Values," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 27(2), pages 545-563, december.
    3. Ivan Malbasic & Nikolina Posaric, 2017. "A Comparison of the Organizational Values of the World's Largest Companies with the Organizational Values of Large Croatian Companies: A Balanced Approach," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    4. Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, 2021. "Workplace Isolation In The Growth Trend Of Remote Working: A Literature Review," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 27, pages 97-113, June.
    5. Moszoro, Marian, 2010. "Analiza problemów biznesowych [Analysis of Business Problems]," MPRA Paper 101936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Krzysztof Machaczka & Maciej Stopa, 2022. "Social Values as One of the Crucial Determinants of Efficient Strategic Management of an Energy Sector Company," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Monique L. Bell, 2023. "Thinking Outside of the Firm: Self-Transcendence Values’ Effects on Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 150-165, May.
    8. Law, Kris M.Y. & Breznik, Kristijan, 2018. "What do airline mission statements reveal about value and strategy?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-44.
    9. Alvaro Lleo & Miquel Bastons & Carlos Rey & Fernando Ruiz-Perez, 2021. "Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Ivan Malbašić & Carlos Rey & Vojko Potočan, 2015. "Balanced Organizational Values: From Theory to Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 437-446, August.
    11. Godoy, Sarah & Kainz, Kirsten & Brevard, Kanisha & Keyes, Oprah, 2022. "A conceptual model to guide collaborative reflective practice and values-driven child welfare decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Mohammad A. Rickaby & Jacqueline Glass & Scott Fernie, 2020. "Conceptualizing the Relationship between Personal Values and Sustainability—A TMO Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Joan Enric Ricart & Carlos Rey, 2022. "Purpose in Corporate Governance: The Path towards a More Sustainable World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Li Qu & Cuiyi Liu & Jielin Yin, 2023. "Effects of Person–Environment Fit on Users’ Willingness to Contribute Knowledge in Virtual Brand Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Maureen Gelle-Jimenez & Hector M. Aguiling, 2021. "Leveraging human resources management (HRM) practices toward congruence of values," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 85-94, January.
    16. Rick C. Warne, 2021. "Using Utility Theory To Frame Challenges And Solutions To Employee Meaningfulness," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 27, pages 77-93, June.
    17. Rita Klapper & Lindsay Berg & Paul Upham, 2020. "Probing Alignment of Personal and Organisational Values for Sustainability: An Assessment of Barrett’s Organisational Consciousness Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:81-92 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jolita Vveinhardt & Evelina Gulbovaite, 2017. "Congruence of Personal and Organizational Values: Moving Beyond Practice," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 81-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:265-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.