IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7584-d413537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probing Alignment of Personal and Organisational Values for Sustainability: An Assessment of Barrett’s Organisational Consciousness Model

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Klapper

    (Department of Strategy, Enterprise and Sustainability, Business School, All Saints Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK)

  • Lindsay Berg

    (Department of Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Paul Upham

    (Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Communication, Leuphana University, Universitätsallee 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany)

Abstract

To what extent are the values of employees and employers aligned in the context of sustainability and how might this be assessed? These are the main research questions in a case study involving a Swedish Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) with ambitions to become more ‘sustainable’. The wider context of the paper is the alignment of managerial and employee values for organisational sustainability. Specifically, the study applies and assesses Barrett’s concept of Organisational Consciousness as a level-based approach to sustainability values, which we argue is based on an integration of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Wilber’s Integral metatheory. Quantifying the incidence of references to various values elicited in interviews, the study demonstrates: the limited salience of Barrett’s themes (‘attributes’) for employees; the divergent perspectives in participants’ personal and organisational lives. While normatively affirming Barrett’s overall approach, we observe that most organisations are likely to be a considerable distance from Barrett’s higher levels. How one interprets this is debatable: it may be concluded that Barrett’s framework is overambitious or that organisations need to: (i) broaden their understanding of sustainability and (ii) nurture alignment between personal and organisational values.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Klapper & Lindsay Berg & Paul Upham, 2020. "Probing Alignment of Personal and Organisational Values for Sustainability: An Assessment of Barrett’s Organisational Consciousness Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7584-:d:413537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Malbašić & Carlos Rey & Vojko Potočan, 2015. "Balanced Organizational Values: From Theory to Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 437-446, August.
    2. Robert E. Quinn & John Rohrbaugh, 1983. "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 363-377, March.
    3. Hamm, Shannon & MacLean, Joanne & Kikulis, Lisa & Thibault, Lucie, 2008. "Value Congruence in a Canadian Nonprofit Sport Organisation: A Case Study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 123-147, September.
    4. Liviu Florea & Yu Cheung & Neil Herndon, 2013. "For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 393-408, May.
    5. Rodrigo Lozano, 2013. "Are Companies Planning their Organisational Changes for Corporate Sustainability? An Analysis of Three Case Studies on Resistance to Change and their Strategies to Overcome it," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 275-295, September.
    6. John Holmberg & Johan Larsson, 2018. "A Sustainability Lighthouse—Supporting Transition Leadership and Conversations on Desirable Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Shannon Hamm & Joanne MacLean & Lisa Kikulis & Lucie Thibault, 2008. "Value Congruence in a Canadian Nonprofit Sport Organisation: A Case Study," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 123-147, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Soberón & Teresa Sánchez-Chaparro & Julia Urquijo & David Pereira, 2020. "Introducing an Organizational Perspective in SDG Implementation in the Public Sector in Spain: The Case of the Former Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasiliki Kioupi & Nikolaos Voulvoulis, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Hayton, John W. & Blundell, Milly & Cullinane, Danny & Walker, Catherine M., 2019. "Building an inclusive cycling “movement”: Exploring the charity-led mobilisation of recreational cycling in communities across Merseyside, England," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 21-37.
    3. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Carmen Abril, 2024. "Sustainability oriented innovation and organizational values: a cluster analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Marwa Tourky & Sharina Osman & William S. Harvey, 2023. "Aligning employee and organizational values to build organizational reputation," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1618-1648, September.
    5. Monique L. Bell, 2023. "Thinking Outside of the Firm: Self-Transcendence Values’ Effects on Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 150-165, May.
    6. MacIntosh, Eric & Spence, Kirsty, 2012. "An exploration of stakeholder values: In search of common ground within an international sport and development initiative," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 404-415.
    7. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2021. "Exploring Relationships among Sustainability Organizational Culture Components at a Leading Asian Industrial Conglomerate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Peter G. Dominick & Dimitra Iordanoglou & Gregory Prastacos & Richard R. Reilly, 2021. "Espoused Values of the “Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For”: Essential Themes and Implementation Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 69-88, September.
    9. Ivan Malbasic & Carlos Rey & Nikolina Posaric, 2018. "Congruence Between Personal And Organizational Mission: The Role Of Balanced Organizational Values," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 27(2), pages 545-563, december.
    10. Maureen Gelle-Jimenez & Hector M. Aguiling, 2021. "Leveraging human resources management (HRM) practices toward congruence of values," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 85-94, January.
    11. Siyuan Wang & Linglan Huang, 2022. "A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Culture and Corporate Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Chinese SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Ivan Malbasic & Nikolina Posaric, 2017. "A Comparison of the Organizational Values of the World's Largest Companies with the Organizational Values of Large Croatian Companies: A Balanced Approach," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    13. Nicola Andreij Rieg & Birgitta Gatersleben & Ian Christie, 2021. "Organizational Change Management for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Simanchala Das & Biswajit Acharjya, 2021. "Understanding Organisational Effectiveness Through Sustainable Human Relations Approach: The Role of Empowerment Climate in Selected Industrial Establishments," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 33-52, April.
    15. Treur, Kim A.D. & Van Der Sluis, Lidewey E.C., 2005. "The Benefits of Coaching for Employees and their Organisations," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    16. A. Emre Demirci, 2013. "Strategic Representation of an Abstract Reality: Spiraling Relations between Organizational Culture and Innovativeness," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 39-55, August.
    17. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    18. Julia Naranjo-Valencia & Ricardo Vidal-Patiño & Gregorio Calderón-Hernández, 2019. "Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-38, November.
    19. Dritan Shoraj & Shyqyri Llaci, 2015. "Motivation and Its Impact on Organizational Effectiveness in Albanian Businesses," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    20. Gregorio Sánchez-Marín & Gabriel Lozano-Reina & Mané Beglaryan, 2022. "HRM Policies and SMEs Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR Orientation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 85-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7584-:d:413537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.