IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v16y2016i4d10.1007_s11115-015-0320-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Fragmentation to Comprehensiveness in Network Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Dal Molin

    (Politecnico di Milano)

  • Cristina Masella

    (Politecnico di Milano)

Abstract

Public networks are increasingly implemented at different government levels and across policy areas to increase coordination of services, decision-making and services delivery. Network governance is one promising theoretical perspective through which networks have been studied by different scholars and schools of thought. However, the literature on network governance is still fragmented, sectorial and issues-based. An overarching framework for the comprehensive analysis of the accumulate knowledge is missing. To address this limitation, we propose a comprehensive framework for analyzing the development of the findings in the field. The framework includes four building blocks that reflect the main issues debated in literature: the conditions affecting the choice of a mode of network governance, the modes of network governance, the dimensions of meta-governance and the outcome evaluation. The framework would support academics and policy makers who deal with network governance in different policy domains. The article concludes with a discussion of the proposed framework and its applications in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella, 2016. "From Fragmentation to Comprehensiveness in Network Governance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 493-508, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:16:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0320-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-015-0320-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-015-0320-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-015-0320-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 747-765, December.
    2. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Shahabi & Adel Azar & Reza Radfar & Reza Asadi Asadifard, 2020. "Combining Soft Systems Methodology with Interpretive Structural Modeling and System Dynamics for Network Orchestration: Case Study of the Formal Science and Technology Collaborative Networks in Iran," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 453-478, August.
    2. Menno Ottens & Jurian Edelenbos, 2018. "Political Leadership as Meta-Governance in Sustainability Transitions: A Case Study Analysis of Meta-Governance in the Case of the Dutch National Agreement on Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Almog-Bar Michal, 2016. "Policy Initiatives towards the Nonprofit Sector: Insights from the Israeli Case," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 237-256, June.
    2. Christer Mattsson, 2019. "Policing Violent Extremism: How the Global War on Terror Meandered Into Local Municipal Policies in Sweden," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    3. Tao, Yuan, 2022. "Understanding the interactions between multiple actors in network governance: Evidence from school turnaround in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Charles Harvey & Jillian Gordon & Mairi Maclean, 2021. "The Ethics of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 33-49, June.
    5. Louise Reardon, 2018. "Networks and problem recognition: advancing the Multiple Streams Approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 457-476, December.
    6. Kim Allen & Anna Bull, 2018. "Following Policy: A Network Ethnography of the UK Character Education Policy Community," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 438-458, June.
    7. Vasilios Andrikopoulos, 2022. "Deciphering Management by Objectives and Results in School Organizations," Journal of Education and Training, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 100-117, August.
    8. Stephen J. Ball, 2009. "Beyond Networks? A Brief Response to ‘Which Networks Matter in Education Governance?’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 688-691, October.
    9. Mark Goodwin, 2009. "Which Networks Matter in Education Governance? A Reply to Ball's ‘New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 680-687, October.
    10. Martin Laffin & John Mawson & Christianne Ormston, 2014. "Public Services in a ‘Postdemocratic Age’: An Alternative Framework to Network Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 762-776, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:16:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0320-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.