IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v32y2014i4p762-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Services in a ‘Postdemocratic Age’: An Alternative Framework to Network Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Laffin

    (School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, England)

  • John Mawson
  • Christianne Ormston

Abstract

This paper questions the continued dominance of the network governance approach in public policy and administration and proposes an alternative framework. We find little evidence to support claims for a paradigmatic shift towards network governance in the English case. Neither does the evidence support claims for a weakening of vertical linkages or a strengthening of horizontal linkages within, or across, service delivery chains in England. Instead, bureaucratic and hierarchical structures remain pervasive and power remains highly centralised. The two case studies, of economic development and affordable housing provision, demonstrate how reforms are driven by elected politicians' political objectives and their support of various target groups in society. Nevertheless, policy making is constrained by conditions of ‘postdemocracy’—essentially, the exigencies of contemporary electoral politics and the pervasive influence of business. The study of public administration and management needs to refocus on the implications for the public services of postdemocracy and address critical questions of power, competing interests, mechanisms of exclusion and inclusion, and contested claims to knowledge and expertise within service delivery chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Laffin & John Mawson & Christianne Ormston, 2014. "Public Services in a ‘Postdemocratic Age’: An Alternative Framework to Network Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 762-776, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:32:y:2014:i:4:p:762-776
    DOI: 10.1068/c1261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Bache, 2003. "Governing through Governance: Education Policy Control under New Labour," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(2), pages 300-314, June.
    2. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Goodwin, 2009. "Which Networks Matter in Education Governance? A Reply to Ball's ‘New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 680-687, October.
    2. Louise Reardon, 2018. "Networks and problem recognition: advancing the Multiple Streams Approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 457-476, December.
    3. Christer Mattsson, 2019. "Policing Violent Extremism: How the Global War on Terror Meandered Into Local Municipal Policies in Sweden," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    4. Tao, Yuan, 2022. "Understanding the interactions between multiple actors in network governance: Evidence from school turnaround in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Andrew Jordan & Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel & Anthony Zito, 2005. "The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(3), pages 477-496, October.
    6. Kim Allen & Anna Bull, 2018. "Following Policy: A Network Ethnography of the UK Character Education Policy Community," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 438-458, June.
    7. Mok, Ka Ho, 2021. "Managing neo-liberalism with Chinese characteristics: The rise of education markets and Higher education governance in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella, 2016. "From Fragmentation to Comprehensiveness in Network Governance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 493-508, December.
    9. Tom Entwistle & Gillian Bristow & Frances Hines & Sophie Donaldson & Steve Martin, 2007. "The Dysfunctions of Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in the Meta-governance of Partnership," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 63-79, January.
    10. Stephen J. Ball, 2009. "Beyond Networks? A Brief Response to ‘Which Networks Matter in Education Governance?’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 688-691, October.
    11. Almog-Bar Michal, 2016. "Policy Initiatives towards the Nonprofit Sector: Insights from the Israeli Case," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 237-256, June.
    12. Charles Harvey & Jillian Gordon & Mairi Maclean, 2021. "The Ethics of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 33-49, June.
    13. Mick Green, 2007. "Governing under advanced liberalism: sport policy and the social investment state," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 40(1), pages 55-71, March.
    14. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    15. Vasilios Andrikopoulos, 2022. "Deciphering Management by Objectives and Results in School Organizations," Journal of Education and Training, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 100-117, August.
    16. Dominik F. Schlossstein, 2011. "Institutions and Organizations in Korea’s Upstream Innovation Governance: A Search for Adaptive Efficiency?," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:32:y:2014:i:4:p:762-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.