IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v23y2018i2p438-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Following Policy: A Network Ethnography of the UK Character Education Policy Community

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Allen

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Anna Bull

    (University of Portsmouth, UK)

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, there has been a growing interest and investment in ‘character’ education across the UK political landscape. Alongside the activities of central government, character education has been promoted by a range of non-government actors in the UK and beyond, including philanthropic foundations, think tanks, education entrepreneurs, and academics. It is the presence of these actors and their relationship to, and influence on, UK government policy that we examine in this article. Investigating character education from a perspective of policy formation and influence, we trace the key policy actors who have contributed to the adoption of character education in the UK, and their international connections, identifying the resources, activities and relationships through which they have achieved policy influence. A central and original contribution of this article is in identifying the financial and ideological influence of US Christian neoconservative philanthropic foundation the John Templeton Foundation on social science research and policy in the UK. Our analysis identifies academics in the UK and US who, through considerable John Templeton Foundation funding, have provided an evidence base that authorises character education as a policy solution. We also locate ‘policy entrepreneurs’ as key nodal actors, whose social capital and elite membership helps to lubricate network relations and facilitate policy influence. Finally, we consider the motivations and vested interests of policy actors, including the John Templeton Foundation’s particular model of philanthropy, and conclude that the character education agenda is underpinned by a set of ideas that promote a free-market, individualistic and socially conservative worldview.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Allen & Anna Bull, 2018. "Following Policy: A Network Ethnography of the UK Character Education Policy Community," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 438-458, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:23:y:2018:i:2:p:438-458
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780418769678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780418769678
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780418769678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erica Burman, 2018. "(Re)sourcing the Character and Resilience Manifesto: Suppressions and Slippages of (Re)presentation and Selective Affectivities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 416-437, June.
    2. M. Mitchell Waldrop, 2011. "Religion: Faith in science," Nature, Nature, vol. 470(7334), pages 323-325, February.
    3. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 747-765, December.
    4. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    5. Imogen Tyler, 2013. "The Riots of the Underclass?: Stigmatisation, Mediation and the Government of Poverty and Disadvantage in Neoliberal Britain," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 25-35, November.
    6. Nick Taylor, 2018. "The Return of Character: Parallels Between Late-Victorian and Twenty-First Century Discourses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 399-415, June.
    7. Rosalind Gill & Shani Orgad, 2018. "The Amazing Bounce-Backable Woman: Resilience and the Psychological Turn in Neoliberalism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 477-495, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stevanus Kaeng & Shelty D. M. Sumual & Roos M. S. Tuerah, 2022. "Character Education at Tomohon Music Studio Education and Skills Institution (LPK): Overview of Character Education Dimensions From Doni Koesoema Albertus," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 145-156, June.
    2. Nick Taylor, 2018. "The Return of Character: Parallels Between Late-Victorian and Twenty-First Century Discourses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 399-415, June.
    3. Kirsty Morrin, 2018. "Tensions in Teaching Character: How the ‘Entrepreneurial Character’ is Reproduced, ‘Refused’, and Negotiated in an English Academy School," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 459-476, June.
    4. Louise Folkes, 2022. "Re-Imagining Social Mobility: The Role of Relationality, Social Class and Place in Qualitative Constructions of Mobility," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 136-153, March.
    5. Anna Bull & Kim Allen, 2018. "Introduction: Sociological Interrogations of the Turn to Character," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 392-398, June.
    6. Erica Burman, 2018. "(Re)sourcing the Character and Resilience Manifesto: Suppressions and Slippages of (Re)presentation and Selective Affectivities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 416-437, June.
    7. Rosalind Gill & Shani Orgad, 2018. "The Amazing Bounce-Backable Woman: Resilience and the Psychological Turn in Neoliberalism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 477-495, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsty Morrin, 2018. "Tensions in Teaching Character: How the ‘Entrepreneurial Character’ is Reproduced, ‘Refused’, and Negotiated in an English Academy School," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 459-476, June.
    2. Anna Bull & Kim Allen, 2018. "Introduction: Sociological Interrogations of the Turn to Character," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 392-398, June.
    3. Christer Mattsson, 2019. "Policing Violent Extremism: How the Global War on Terror Meandered Into Local Municipal Policies in Sweden," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    4. Tao, Yuan, 2022. "Understanding the interactions between multiple actors in network governance: Evidence from school turnaround in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella, 2016. "From Fragmentation to Comprehensiveness in Network Governance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 493-508, December.
    6. Almog-Bar Michal, 2016. "Policy Initiatives towards the Nonprofit Sector: Insights from the Israeli Case," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 237-256, June.
    7. Charles Harvey & Jillian Gordon & Mairi Maclean, 2021. "The Ethics of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 33-49, June.
    8. Louise Reardon, 2018. "Networks and problem recognition: advancing the Multiple Streams Approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 457-476, December.
    9. Vasilios Andrikopoulos, 2022. "Deciphering Management by Objectives and Results in School Organizations," Journal of Education and Training, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 100-117, August.
    10. Marisa Silvestri, 2013. "Reflections on a ‘Depressing Inevitability’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 5-9, November.
    11. Matthew Cooper, 2021. "‘21st Century Welfare’ in Historical Perspective: Disciplinary Welfare in the Depression of the 1930s and Its Implications for Today," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 326-342, June.
    12. Maree Martinussen, 2019. "Reason, Season, or Life? Heterorelationality and the Limits of Intimacy between Women Friends," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 297-313, September.
    13. Joanne McGrath & Monique Lhussier & Stephen Crossley & Natalie Forster, 2023. "“They Tarred Me with the Same Brush”: Navigating Stigma in the Context of Child Removal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Tracey Jensen, 2013. "Riots, Restraint and the New Cultural Politics of Wanting," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 36-47, November.
    15. Joanne McKenzie, 2017. "‘The Person God Made Me to Be’: Navigating Working-Class and Christian Identities in English Evangelical Christianity," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 213-225, February.
    16. Ben Kerrane & Emma Banister & Hadi Wijaya, 2022. "Exploring the lived experiences of Singapore’s “opt‐out” mothers: Introducing “Professional Motherhood”," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 863-879, May.
    17. Ciccone, Vanessa, 2020. "Vulnerable resilience: the politics of vulnerability as a self-improvement discourse," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106701, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Madeleine Castro, 2020. "Introducing the Red Tent: A Discursive and Critically Hopeful Exploration of Women’s Circles in a Neoliberal Postfeminist Context," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(3), pages 386-404, September.
    19. Giorgia Doná & Helen Taylor, 2015. "The ‘Peaks and Troughs’ of Societal Violence: Revisiting the Actions of Turkish and Kurdish Shopkeepers during the 2011 London Riots," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 83-93, February.
    20. Jennie Bristow, 2013. "Reporting the Riots: Parenting Culture and the Problem of Authority in Media Analysis of August 2011," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(4), pages 100-110, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:23:y:2018:i:2:p:438-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.