IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v193y2024i2d10.1007_s10551-023-05560-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rightsholder-Driven Remedy for Business-Related Human Rights Abuse: Case of the Fair Food Program

Author

Listed:
  • Alysha Kate Shivji

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Formally Alliance Manchester Business School)

Abstract

This paper investigates necessary conditions for developing a participatory, rightsholder-driven approach to remedy for business-related human rights abuses by analyzing findings from a case study with the Fair Food Program. With the inclusion of human rights into discussions of business ethics and CSR, scholars and practitioners have made calls for participatory approaches to remedy to address cases of human rights abuses. However, a gap remains in our understanding of how to operationalize participatory approaches in a manner that empowers rightsholders, particularly within contexts of severe power imbalances. The paper puts forth a rightsholder-driven theoretical framework for remedy, grounded on critical dialogic accountability principles and integrated with empirical analysis from the Fair Food Program case study. This framework defines remedy as a system comprising reinforcing aspects rather than standalone mechanisms. The critical dialogic accounting and accountability framework provides a theoretical framing of engagement that enables the inclusion of multiple, divergent voices and aims toward meaningful engagement with marginalized groups. The analysis of findings from the case study identifies enforcement and education as necessary conditions for effective and empowering rightsholder-driven approaches to remedy. The paper deconstructs these conditions to develop an understanding of the program’s unique approach to enforcement and education. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of rightsholder-driven remedy for Business and Human Rights and business accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alysha Kate Shivji, 2024. "Rightsholder-Driven Remedy for Business-Related Human Rights Abuse: Case of the Fair Food Program," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 363-382, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:193:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05560-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05560-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-023-05560-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-023-05560-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Murphy & Jordi Vives, 2013. "Perceptions of Justice and the Human Rights Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 781-797, September.
    2. Reyes Chavez, Gerardo, 2023. "Awareness, Analysis and Action: A Rights Holder Perspective on Building the Fair Food Movement and the Way Forward for Worker-Driven Social Responsibility," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 85-89, February.
    3. Emilio Passetti & Lara Bianchi & Massimo Battaglia & Marco Frey, 2019. "When Democratic Principles are not Enough: Tensions and Temporalities of Dialogic Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 173-190, March.
    4. Dorothée Baumann-Pauly & Justine Nolan & Auret Heerden & Michael Samway, 2017. "Industry-Specific Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives That Govern Corporate Human Rights Standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 771-787, July.
    5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby, 2010. "Governing the Global Corporation: A Critical Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 265-274, April.
    6. Oka, Chikako & Egels-Zandén, Niklas & Alexander, Rachel, 2020. "Buyer engagement and labour conditions in global supply chains: the Bangladesh Accord and beyond," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106695, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Sepideh Parsa & Ian Roper & Michael Muller-Camen & Eva Szigetvari, 2018. "Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 47-64, March.
    8. Jan Bebbington & Judy Brown & Bob Frame & Ian Thomson, 2007. "Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 356-381, June.
    9. Rashmi Venkatesan, 2019. "The UN Framework on Business and Human Rights: A Workers’ Rights Critique," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 635-652, July.
    10. Carolijn TERWINDT & Amy ARMSTRONG, 2019. "Oversight and accountability in the social auditing industry: The role of social compliance initiatives," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(2), pages 245-272, June.
    11. Steven A. Brieger & Siri A. Terjesen & Diana M. Hechavarría & Christian Welzel, 2019. "Prosociality in Business: A Human Empowerment Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 361-380, October.
    12. Karin Buhmann, 2016. "Public Regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(4), pages 699-714, July.
    13. Rajiv Maher & Moritz Neumann & Mette Slot Lykke, 2022. "Extracting Legitimacy: An Analysis of Corporate Responses to Accusations of Human Rights Abuses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 609-628, April.
    14. RUGGIE, John Gerard & REES, Caroline & DAVIS, Rachel, 2021. "Ten Years After: From UN Guiding Principles to Multi-Fiduciary Obligations," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 179-197, June.
    15. Sarah Lauwo, 2018. "Challenging Masculinity in CSR Disclosures: Silencing of Women’s Voices in Tanzania’s Mining Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 689-706, May.
    16. Dillard, Jesse & Vinnari, Eija, 2019. "Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 16-38.
    17. Anna Clare Bull & Jagjit Plahe & Lachlan Gregory, 2021. "International Investment Agreements and the Escalation of Private Power in the Global Agri-Food System," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 519-533, May.
    18. Ken McPhail & John Ferguson, 2016. "The past, the present and the future of accounting for human rights," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 526-541, May.
    19. Maximilian J. L. Schormair & Lara M. Gerlach, 2020. "Corporate Remediation of Human Rights Violations: A Restorative Justice Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 475-493, December.
    20. KAUFMAN, Jonathan & McDONNELL, Katherine, 2016. "Community-Driven Operational Grievance Mechanisms," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 127-132, January.
    21. Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam, 1996. "Accounting/art and the emancipatory project: some reflections," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(5), pages 23-44, December.
    22. SCHREMPF-STIRLING, Judith & VAN BUREN, Harry J., 2020. "Business and Human Rights Scholarship in Social Issues in Management: An Analytical Review," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 28-55, January.
    23. Chikako Oka & Niklas Egels‐Zandén & Rachel Alexander, 2020. "Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1306-1330, September.
    24. Sébastien Mena & Marieke Leede & Dorothée Baumann & Nicky Black & Sara Lindeman & Lindsay McShane, 2010. "Advancing the Business and Human Rights Agenda: Dialogue, Empowerment, and Constructive Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 161-188, April.
    25. Brown, Judy, 2009. "Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342.
    26. Martin Fougère & Nikodemus Solitander, 2020. "Dissent in Consensusland: An Agonistic Problematization of Multi-stakeholder Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 683-699, July.
    27. THOMPSON, Benjamin, 2017. "Determining Criteria to Evaluate Outcomes of Businesses’ Provision of Remedy: Applying a Human Rights-Based Approach," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 55-85, January.
    28. Sandra Moog & André Spicer & Steffen Böhm, 2015. "The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 469-493, May.
    29. Olivier Boiral & Yves Gendron, 2011. "Sustainable Development and Certification Practices: Lessons Learned and Prospects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 331-347, July.
    30. Joni Valkila & Anja Nygren, 2010. "Impacts of Fair Trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 321-333, September.
    31. Fabiola MIERES & Siobhán MCGRATH, 2021. "Ripe to be heard: Worker voice in the Fair Food Program," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(4), pages 631-647, December.
    32. Christiane Marie Høvring & Sophie Esmann Andersen & Anne Ellerup Nielsen, 2018. "Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 627-645, October.
    33. KIRKEBØ, Tori Loven & LANGFORD, Malcolm, 2018. "The Commitment Curve: Global Regulation of Business and Human Rights," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 157-185, July.
    34. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus J., 2022. "Not at our table: Stakeholder exclusion and ant/agonistic engagements," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    35. Sasha Courville & Nicola Piper, 2004. "Harnessing Hope through NGO Activism," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 592(1), pages 39-61, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dillard, Jesse & Shivji, Alysha & Bianchi, Lara, 2024. "Rights-based, worker-driven accountability in the fields: Contesting the uncontested contestable," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. George, Sendirella & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse, 2023. "Social movement activists’ conceptions of political action and counter-accounting through a critical dialogic accounting and accountability lens," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Rogerson, Michael & Scarpa, Francesco & Snelson-Powell, Annie, 2024. "Accounting for human rights: Evidence of due diligence in EU-listed firms’ reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Norma Schönherr, 2022. "Same Same but Different? A Quantitative Exploration of Voluntary Sustainability Standards in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Maximilian J. L. Schormair & Lara M. Gerlach, 2020. "Corporate Remediation of Human Rights Violations: A Restorative Justice Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 475-493, December.
    6. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus J., 2022. "Not at our table: Stakeholder exclusion and ant/agonistic engagements," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Manon Eikelenboom & Thomas B. Long, 2023. "Breaking the Cycle of Marginalization: How to Involve Local Communities in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 31-62, August.
    8. Rajiv Maher, 2022. "Deliberating or Stalling for Justice? Dynamics of Corporate Remediation and Victim Resistance Through the Lens of Parentalism: The Fundão dam Collapse and the Renova Foundation in Brazil," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 15-36, June.
    9. Aresu, Simone & Monfardini, Patrizio, 2023. "Oppressed by consumerism: The emancipatory role of household accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    11. Tanima, Farzana Aman & Brown, Judy & Wright, Jan & Mackie, Vera, 2023. "Taking critical dialogic accountability into the field: Engaging contestation around microfinance and women’s empowerment," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Onyeka K. Osuji & Ugochukwu L. Obibuaku, 2016. "Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 329-347, June.
    13. Chakhovich, Terhi & Virtanen, Tuija, 2023. "Accountability for sustainability – An institutional entrepreneur as the representative of future stakeholders," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Alexander, Anna & Pilonato, Silvia & Redigolo, Giulia, 2023. "Do institutional donors value social media activity and engagement? Empirical evidence on Italian non-profit grantees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    15. Annesi, Nora & Battaglia, Massimo & Frey, Marco, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement by an Italian water utility company: Insight from participant observation of dialogism," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Ang, Soon Yong & Wickramasinghe, Danture, 2023. "Ethical disputes, coordinating acts and NGO accountability: Evidence from an NGO river-care programme in Malaysia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Laura Broccardo & Sara Giovanna Mauro, 2024. "The path towards sustainability: The role of internal stakeholders and management accounting in a dialogic perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2496-2513, May.
    18. Matthew Amengual & Rita Mota & Alexander Rustler, 2023. "The ‘Court of Public Opinion:’ Public Perceptions of Business Involvement in Human Rights Violations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 49-74, June.
    19. Stephanie Schrage & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2021. "Addressing Governance Gaps in Global Value Chains: Introducing a Systematic Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 657-672, May.
    20. Martinez, Daniel & Himick, Darlene, 2023. "Accounting in (direct) action: Prefiguring emancipation in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:193:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05560-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.