IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v182y2023i3d10.1007_s10551-021-05002-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EThIC Model of Virtue-Based Allyship Development: A New Approach to Equity and Inclusion in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Meg A. Warren

    (Western Washington University)

  • Michael T. Warren

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

As organizations take on grand challenges in gender equality, anti-racism, LGBTQ+ protections and workplace inclusion, many well-intentioned individuals from dominant groups (e.g., cisgender men, Caucasian, heterosexual) are stepping forward as allies toward underrepresented or marginalized group members (e.g., cisgender women, People of Color, LGBTQ+ identified employees). Past research and guidance assume an inevitable need for external motivation, reflected in the ‘business case’ for diversity and in top-down policies to drive equity and inclusion efforts. This qualitative study explored internal motivations in the form of morally motivated virtues of 25 peer-nominated exemplary allies serving in leadership positions. In-depth life/career story interviews were used to identify the virtues that supported their allyship journeys. Findings demonstrated that they tapped into several virtues that served distinct functions in a 4-stage allyship development process: Stage 1—Energizing psychological investment (compassion, fairness); Stage 2—Thinking through allyship-relevant complexities (intellectual humility, perspective-taking, wisdom); Stage 3—Initiating action (prudence, moral courage, honesty); Stage 4—Committing to allyship (perseverance, patience). We call this the ‘EThIC model of virtue-based allyship development.’ This study has implications for theory and research on a virtue-based approach to diversity, equity and inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Meg A. Warren & Michael T. Warren, 2023. "The EThIC Model of Virtue-Based Allyship Development: A New Approach to Equity and Inclusion in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 783-803, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:182:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-021-05002-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-05002-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-021-05002-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-021-05002-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elad N. Sherf & Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Katy Connealy Weber, 2017. "It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 193-210, April.
    2. Hans Dijk & Marloes Engen & Jaap Paauwe, 2012. "Reframing the Business Case for Diversity: A Values and Virtues Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 73-84, November.
    3. Marcel Meyer, 2018. "The Evolution and Challenges of the Concept of Organizational Virtuousness in Positive Organizational Scholarship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 245-264, November.
    4. David Bright & Bradley Winn & Jason Kanov, 2014. "Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(4), pages 445-460, February.
    5. Sonya Fontenot Premeaux & Arthur G. Bedeian, 2003. "Breaking the Silence: The Moderating Effects of Self‐Monitoring in Predicting Speaking Up in the Workplace," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1537-1562, September.
    6. Audi, Robert, 2012. "Virtue Ethics as a Resource in Business," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 273-291, April.
    7. Chien-Han Kao & Jenny C. Su & Jennifer Crocker & Jen-Ho Chang, 2017. "The Benefits of Transcending Self-Interest: Examining the Role of Self-Transcendence on Expressive Suppression and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 959-975, August.
    8. Sandra E. Cha & Laura Morgan Roberts, 2019. "Leveraging Minority Identities at Work: An Individual-Level Framework of the Identity Mobilization Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 735-760, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Coverage of Allies, Allyship and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-38, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandrine Frémeaux, 2020. "A Common Good Perspective on Diversity," Post-Print hal-03232779, HAL.
    2. Irene Tsachouridi & Irene Nikandrou, 2020. "The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness’ Perceptions and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 535-551, October.
    3. Henry C. Y. Ho & Wai Kai Hou & Kai-Tak POON & Angel N. M. Leung & Joyce L. Y. Kwan, 2023. "Being Virtuous Together: A One-Year Prospective Study on Organizational Virtuousness, Well-Being, and Organizational Commitment," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 521-542, February.
    4. Pablo Sanz & Joan Fontrodona, 2019. "Moderation as a Moral Competence: Integrating Perspectives for a Better Understanding of Temperance in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 981-994, April.
    5. Giorgio Mion & Vania Vigolo & Angelo Bonfanti & Riccardo Tessari, 2023. "The Virtuousness of Ethical Networks: How to Foster Virtuous Practices in Nonprofit Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 107-123, November.
    6. David Dawson, 2018. "Organisational Virtue, Moral Attentiveness, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Business: The Case of UK HR Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 765-781, April.
    7. Andrew Armitage, 2012. "A Methodology of the Imagination," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Roberta Sferrazzo & Renato Ruffini, 2021. "Are Liberated Companies a Concrete Application of Sen’s Capability Approach?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 329-342, May.
    9. Jongwoo Kim & Richard L. Baskerville & Yi Ding, 2020. "Breaking the Privacy Kill Chain: Protecting Individual and Group Privacy Online," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 171-185, February.
    10. Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Carmen Cabello-Medina, 2013. "The Role of Four Universal Moral Competencies in Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 717-734, September.
    11. Kennedy, Jessica A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2018. "Building trust by tearing others down: When accusing others of unethical behavior engenders trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 111-128.
    12. Vasile Petru Hațegan, 2019. "Interdisciplinary Connections of Philosophical Practice with the Business Environment," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 504-508, December.
    13. Argandoña, Antonio, 2017. "Humility and Decision Making in Companies," IESE Research Papers D/1164, IESE Business School.
    14. Xingyun Liu & Lili Song & Jiewen Zheng & Yong Wang, 2022. "When Chinese Employees Speak Up: The Experience of Organizational Trust and Authenticity Enhances Employees’ Voice Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Wolfgruber, Daniel & Einwiller, Sabine & Brockhaus, J., 2021. "Let's talk about diversity & inclusion: Fostering an inclusive work environment through communication," Communication Insights 11, Academic Society for Management & Communication – An initiative of the Günter Thiele Foundation, Leipzig.
    16. Mitchell J. Neubert & Emily M. Hunter & Remy C. Tolentino, 2022. "Modeling Character: Servant Leaders, Incivility and Patient Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 261-278, June.
    17. Carl Rhodes, 2017. "Ethical Praxis and the Business Case for LGBT Diversity: Political Insights from Judith Butler and Emmanuel Levinas," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 533-546, September.
    18. Goodell, John W. & Li, Mingsheng & Liu, Desheng & Wang, Yizhen, 2024. "Aligning empirical evidence on ESG with ancient conservative traditions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    20. Tanja Rabl & María del Triana, 2014. "Organizational Value for Age Diversity and Potential Applicants’ Organizational Attraction: Individual Attitudes Matter," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 403-417, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:182:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-021-05002-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.