IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15726-d984642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Chinese Employees Speak Up: The Experience of Organizational Trust and Authenticity Enhances Employees’ Voice Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyun Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    The authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lili Song

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    The authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiewen Zheng

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yong Wang

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China
    The Research Center for Psychological Education, University of International Relations, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

Voice behavior is important for innovation, mistake prevention and organizational performance. Because organizational trust increases employees’ possibility of disclosing their real inner ideas, we examined the relationships between organizational trust and voice behavior, focusing especially on the avenue of impelling people to feel a higher level of authenticity. We used multiple methods to analyze the relationship. First, we used two separate surveys (Studies 1a and 1b) with different questionnaires and populations to analyze the mediation relationship and generalize the results. Then, to test the causal path, an experiment (Study 2a) in which organizational trust was manipulated was designed. The results showed that employees’ authenticity mediated the relation between organizational trust and voice behavior. To further test the causal effect of authenticity in the above mediation, authenticity was manipulated in another experiment (Study 2b). The results illustrated that higher levels of authenticity directly led to higher levels of voice behavior. These results support the hypothesis and expound on the psychological mechanism of how organizational trust increases voice behavior. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyun Liu & Lili Song & Jiewen Zheng & Yong Wang, 2022. "When Chinese Employees Speak Up: The Experience of Organizational Trust and Authenticity Enhances Employees’ Voice Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15726-:d:984642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph Bosch & Toon Taris, 2014. "Authenticity at Work: Development and Validation of an Individual Authenticity Measure at Work," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Neerpal Rathi & Kidong Lee, 2021. "Does It Pay to Be Authentic? Implications of Authenticity for Life Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being in a Collectivist Culture," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 147-161, January.
    3. Amy C. Edmondson, 2003. "Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1419-1452, September.
    4. Frances J. Milliken & Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison, 2003. "Shades of Silence: Emerging Themes and Future Directions for Research on Silence in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1563-1568, September.
    5. Sonya Fontenot Premeaux & Arthur G. Bedeian, 2003. "Breaking the Silence: The Moderating Effects of Self‐Monitoring in Predicting Speaking Up in the Workplace," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1537-1562, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "Organizational Silence, A Barrier to Job Engagement in Successful Organizations," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 100-117, April.
    3. David Whiteside & Laurie Barclay, 2013. "Echoes of Silence: Employee Silence as a Mediator Between Overall Justice and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 251-266, August.
    4. Wu, Frances & Dixon-Woods, Mary & Aveling, Emma-Louise & Campbell, Anne & Willars, Janet & Tarrant, Carolyn & Bates, David W. & Dankers, Christian & Mitchell, Imogen & Pronovost, Peter & Martin, Graha, 2021. "The role of the informal and formal organisation in voice about concerns in healthcare: A qualitative interview study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Halime GOKTAS KULUALP, 2016. "Calisan Sesliligi ile Bazi Kisisel ve Orgutsel Ozellikler Arasindaki Iliskinin Belirlenmesi: Ogretim Elemanlari Uzerine Bir Arastirma," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 16(4), pages 745-761.
    6. An-Chih Wang & Jack Ting-Ju Chiang & Wan-Ju Chou & Bor-Shiuan Cheng, 2017. "One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 505-535, September.
    7. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Andrew Armitage, 2012. "A Methodology of the Imagination," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Winter, Vera & Thomsen, Mette Kjærgaard & Schreyögg, Jonas & Blankart, Katharina & Duminy, Lize & Schoenenberger, Lukas & Ansah, John P. & Matchar, David & Blankart, Carl Rudolf & Oppel, Eva & Jensen,, 2019. "Improving Service Provision - The Health Care Services' Perspective," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 3(4), pages 163-183.
    10. Xue Tong Dong & Yang Woon Chung & Jeong Kwon Yun, 2023. "The Mediating Effects of Anxiety and Happiness and the Moderating Effect of Social Network Services for Employee Silence and Psychological Withdrawal Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    11. Gopesh Anand & John Gray & Enno Siemsen, 2012. "Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1700-1716, December.
    12. Mar Ortiz-Gómez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Horacio Molina-Sánchez, 2020. "Servant Leadership in a Social Religious Organization: An Analysis of Work Engagement, Authenticity, and Spirituality at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier, 2018. "Report for the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry," Papers 1805.12106, arXiv.org.
    14. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    15. Elad N. Sherf & Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Vijaya Venkataramani, 2019. "Why Managers Do Not Seek Voice from Employees: The Importance of Managers’ Personal Control and Long-Term Orientation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 447-466, May.
    16. Bo Wendy Gao & Chris Zhu & Hongmei Song & Ianthe M. Belisle Dempsey, 2022. "Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 31-55, March.
    17. Niamh Brennan & Doris Merkl-Davies & Annika Beelitz, 2013. "Dialogism in Corporate Social Responsibility Communications: Conceptualising Verbal Interaction Between Organisations and Their Audiences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 665-679, July.
    18. Hourieh Rahmanimehr & Asghar Sharifi, 2016. "Study the Impact of Employing Action Research on Middle School Teachers' Performance," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 1-7, December.
    19. Ying Xue & Xiyuan Li & Hao Liang & Yuan Li, 2020. "How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees’ Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Muhammad Usman & Ahmed Abdul Hameed & Shahid Manzoor, 2018. "Exploring the links between Ethical Leadership and Organizational Unlearning: A Case Study of a European Multinational Company," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(2), pages 28-54, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15726-:d:984642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.