IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v156y2019i1d10.1007_s10551-017-3626-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Rommel O. Salvador

    (California State University, Fullerton)

Abstract

Cumulative evidence points to the effectiveness of moral dilemma discussion as a pedagogical strategy. However, much of the extant empirical research has been limited to investigating its effect on moral judgment. In addition, the potentially distinct effects of the two major components of the intervention, the intrapersonal contemplation and the interpersonal discussion that follows, have been barely examined. Using the Trolley Problem, this quasi-experimental study (N = 115) examined the effectiveness of moral dilemma discussion and of intrapersonal moral dilemma contemplation in promoting prosocial intentions among individuals in the context of a product-harm situation. The results confirm that moral dilemma discussion positively influences some forms of prosocial intentions. The results also suggest that moral dilemma discussion is not necessarily more effective than intrapersonal moral dilemma contemplation in promoting prosocial intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rommel O. Salvador, 2019. "Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 241-256, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:156:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-017-3626-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis Collins & James Weber & Rebecca Zambrano, 2014. "Teaching Business Ethics Online: Perspectives on Course Design, Delivery, Student Engagement, and Assessment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 513-529, December.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Ethan Waples & Alison Antes & Stephen Murphy & Shane Connelly & Michael Mumford, 2009. "A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 133-151, June.
    4. Danae Manika & Victoria Wells & Diana Gregory-Smith & Michael Gentry, 2015. "The Impact of Individual Attitudinal and Organisational Variables on Workplace Environmentally Friendly Behaviours," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(4), pages 663-684, February.
    5. Harald Van Heerde & Kristiaan Helsen & Marnik G. Dekimpe, 2007. "The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 230-245, 03-04.
    6. Koehn, Daryl, 2013. "Why Saying “I’m Sorry” Isn’t Good Enough: The Ethics of Corporate Apologies," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 239-268, April.
    7. Douglas May & Matthew Luth & Catherine Schwoerer, 2014. "The Influence of Business Ethics Education on Moral Efficacy, Moral Meaningfulness, and Moral Courage: A Quasi-experimental Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 67-80, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Hauser, 2019. "Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 281-299, September.
    2. Yu, Heyao & Legendre, Tiffany S. & Ma, Jing, 2021. "We stand by our brand: Consumers’ post-food safety crisis purchase intention and moral reasoning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 79-87.
    3. Ervin L. Black & F. Greg Burton & Joshua K. Cieslewicz, 2022. "Improving Ethics: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Include Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 945-978, December.
    4. Katarina Katja Mihelič & Barbara Culiberg, 2019. "Reaping the Fruits of Another’s Labor: The Role of Moral Meaningfulness, Mindfulness, and Motivation in Social Loafing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 713-727, December.
    5. Felix Ostertag, 2023. "Integrating OCBE Literature and Norm Activation Theory: A Moderated Mediation on Proenvironmental Behavior of Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Akvile Cibinskiene & Daiva Dumciuviene & Meda Andrijauskiene, 2020. "Energy Consumption in Public Buildings: The Determinants of Occupants’ Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Carina S. González-González & Alfonso Infante-Moro & Juan C. Infante-Moro, 2020. "Implementation of E-Proctoring in Online Teaching: A Study about Motivational Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Barbara Culiberg & Katarina Katja Mihelič, 2017. "The Evolution of Whistleblowing Studies: A Critical Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(4), pages 787-803, December.
    9. Christian Hauser, 2020. "From Preaching to Behavioral Change: Fostering Ethics and Compliance Learning in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 835-855, April.
    10. Faiq Aziz* & Nomahaza Mahadi & Jihad Mohammad, 2018. "Employee Pro-Environmental Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Suggestions for Future Research," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 272-280:2.
    11. Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz, 2017. "Highlighting Moral Courage in the Business Ethics Course," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 703-723, December.
    12. Flevy Lasrado & Norhayati Zakaria, 2020. "Go green! Exploring the organizational factors that influence self-initiated green behavior in the United Arab Emirates," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 823-850, September.
    13. Amélie Guèvremont & Bianca Grohmann, 2018. "Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 322-336, July.
    14. Lam D. Nguyen & Quan H. M. Tran, 2018. "Working Adults and Personal Business Ethics in South East Asia: a Comparative Study in Thailand and Vietnam," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-174, June.
    15. Ian M. Katz & Rachel S. Rauvola & Cort W. Rudolph & Hannes Zacher, 2022. "Employee green behavior: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1146-1157, September.
    16. Yan Wah Leung & Sonny Rosenthal, 2019. "Explicating Perceived Sustainability-Related Climate: A Situational Motivator of Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Mei-Chee Tan & Tuan-Hock Ng & Ying-San Lim & Chun-Teck Lye & Hishamuddin Ismail, 2018. "Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Information and Communication Technology -waste Management," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 347-355.
    18. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Mehrdokht Pournader & Jennifer S. A. Leigh, 2022. "Responsible Management Education as Socialization: Business Students’ Values, Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 17-35, February.
    19. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:156:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-017-3626-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.