IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v123y2014i2p295-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Cronyism: A Scale Development and Validation from the Perspective of Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammed Turhan

Abstract

Organizational cronyism refers to favoring some employees within an organization based on non-performance-related factors. Although it is highly likely to encounter many attitudes and behaviors meeting this description within public and private institutions, there are limited studies on this issue. Thus, the purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess the perception of cronyism among organizational members. To this end, an item pool was formed based on current literature as well the views of teachers and expert recommendations. The validity–reliability of the scale was tested via two sample groups. As a result of the study, a scale with 3 dimensions and 15 items as well as psychometric qualities was developed to assess employee perceptions of cronyism. The scale dimensions comprise: in-group bias, paternal cronyism, and reciprocal exchange of favor in accordance with the way the method was addressed in the literature. The analyses of nomological validity of the scale showed that perception of cronyism is an important predictor of trust in managers. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammed Turhan, 2014. "Organizational Cronyism: A Scale Development and Validation from the Perspective of Teachers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 295-308, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:295-308
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Kai & Song, Lynda Jiwen & Hackett, Rick D. & Bycio, Peter, 2006. "Cultural Boundary of Expectancy Theory-Based Performance Management: A Commentary on DeNisi and Pritchard's Performance Improvement Model," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 279-294, July.
    2. Spranger, Jennifer L. & Colarelli, Stephen M. & Dimotakis, Nikolaos & Jacob, Annalyn C. & Arvey, Richard D., 2012. "Effects of kin density within family-owned businesses," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 151-162.
    3. Naresh Khatri & Eric W K Tsang & Thomas M Begley, 2006. "Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(1), pages 61-75, January.
    4. Kai Zhang & Lynda Jiwen Song & Rick D. Hackett & Peter Bycio, 2006. "Cultural Boundary of Expectancy Theory-Based Performance Management: A Commentary on DeNisi and Pritchard’s Performance Improvement Model," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(2), pages 279-294, July.
    5. Thomas Begley & Naresh Khatri & Eric Tsang, 2010. "Networks and cronyism: A social exchange analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 281-297, June.
    6. Ekin K Pellegrini & Terri A Scandura, 2006. "Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(2), pages 264-279, March.
    7. Prendergast, Canice & Topel, Robert H, 1996. "Favoritism in Organizations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(5), pages 958-978, October.
    8. Wong, Yui-Tim & Ngo, Hang-Yue & Wong, Chi-Sum, 2006. "Perceived organizational justice, trust, and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 344-355, December.
    9. Jone L. Pearce & Imre Branyiczki & Gregory A. Bigley, 2000. "Insufficient Bureaucracy: Trust and Commitment in Particularistic Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 148-162, April.
    10. Gül Erben & Ayşe Begüm Güneşer, 2008. "The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Role of Climate Regarding Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 955-968, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xiao-Ping & Ren, Han, 2023. "Indirect cronyism and its underlying exchange logic: How managers’ particularism orientation and the third Party’s hierarchical power strengthen its existence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Saqlain Pervez & Muhammad Anwar ul Haq & Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed & Muhammad Usman, 2019. "Linking Cronyism, Psychological Contract Breach, And Moral Disengagement: A Study Of Public Sector University Teachers," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(1), pages 170-183.
    3. Junfan Yu & Saskia Klerk & Michael Hess, 2023. "The influence of cronyism on entrepreneurial resource acquisition," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 121-150, March.
    4. Sarah Hudson & Helena V. González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2022. "Societal Inequality, Corruption and Relation-Based Inequality in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 789-809, December.
    5. Egor Evdokimov & Dean Hanlon & Edwin KiaYang Lim, 2022. "Do Generalist CEOs Magnify Boardroom Backscratching?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 221-247, November.
    6. Gao, Zhonghua & Zhao, Chen & Liu, Yonghong, 2023. "Fostering a salesperson’s team identification: An investigation into the effects of leader-follower emotional intelligence congruence from a person–environment fit perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Saqlain Pervez & Muhammad Anwar ul Haq & Mirza Ashfaq Ahmed & Muhammad Usman, 2019. "Linking Cronyism, Psychological Contract Breach, And Moral Disengagement: A Study Of Public Sector University Teachers," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(1), pages 15-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raymond Loi & Hang-Yue Ngo, 2010. "Mobility norms, risk aversion, and career satisfaction of Chinese employees," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 237-255, June.
    2. Sarah Hudson & Helena V. González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2022. "Societal Inequality, Corruption and Relation-Based Inequality in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 789-809, December.
    3. Burhan, Omar K. & van Leeuwen, Esther & Scheepers, Daan, 2020. "On the hiring of kin in organizations: Perceived nepotism and its implications for fairness perceptions and the willingness to join an organization," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 34-48.
    4. Sarah Hudson & Helena V González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2019. "Legitimacy, Particularism and Employee Commitment and Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 589-603, July.
    5. Pinar Erden & Ayse Begum Otken, 2019. "The Dark Side of Paternalistic Leadership: Employee Discrimination and Nepotism," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 154-180.
    6. Yu, Nan, 2012. "All in transition - Human resource management and labour relations in the Chinese industrial sector," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2012-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Yanhan Zhu & Diwan Li, 2016. "Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi violations: Trickle-down effects beyond the Dyad," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(5), pages 399-423, December.
    8. Valeria Maggian & Natalia Montinari & Antonio Nicol�, 2018. "Backscratching in Hierarchical Organizations," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 133-161.
    9. Long Zhang & Yulin Deng & Qun Wang, 2014. "An Exploratory Study of Chinese Motives for Building Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 659-675, November.
    10. Suk Bong Choi & Thi Bich Hanh Tran & Seung-Wan Kang, 2017. "Inclusive Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Person-Job Fit," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1877-1901, December.
    11. Muethel, Miriam & Hoegl, Martin, 2012. "The influence of social institutions on managers’ concept of trust: Implications for trust-building in Sino-German relationships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 420-434.
    12. Jasper Hotho & Dana Minbaeva & Maral Muratbekova-Touron & Larissa Rabbiosi, 2020. "Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 659-679, September.
    13. Anand, Amitabh & Dalmasso, Audrey & Vessal, Saeedeh Rezaee & Parameswar, Nakul & Rajasekar, James & Dhal, Manoranjan, 2023. "The effect of job security, insecurity, and burnout on employee organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Wang, Jenny (Jing) & Hooper, Keith, 2017. "Internal control and accommodation in Chinese organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 18-30.
    15. Mansur, Juliana & Sobral, Filipe & Goldszmidt, Rafael, 2017. "Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 702-713.
    16. Nadeem, Sadia & Raza, Mishal & Kayani, Neelab & Aziz, Amna & Nayab, Dure, 2018. "Examining cross-cultural compatibility of high performance work practices," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 563-583.
    17. Dey, Oindrila & Das, Abhishek & Gupta, Gautam & Banerjee, Swapnendu, 2017. "Favouritism Or Fairness?: A Framed Laboratory Experiment," MPRA Paper 80214, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Stephen Chen, 2009. "Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 523-536, December.
    19. Maria Kravtsova & Aleksey Oshchepkov, 2019. "Market And Network Corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 209/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Farrukh Shahzad & Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad & Azer Dilanchiev & Muhammad Irfan, 2022. "Modeling the Influence of Paternalistic Leadership and Personality Characteristics on Alienation and Organizational Culture in the Aviation Industry of Pakistan: The Mediating Role of Cohesiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:295-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.