IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v87y2024i11d10.1007_s10640-024-00911-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Does Air Quality Information Disclosure Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from the Ambient Air Quality Standard (2012) Program in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Deng

    (University of International Business and Economics)

  • Qianqian Yue

    (Fengtai District Statistical Bureau)

  • Xin Zhao

    (University of International Business and Economics)

Abstract

Air quality information disclosure has emerged as a popular policy tool to reduce emissions, yet its impact on both environmental and economic performance remains ambiguous. This study employs a comprehensive measure of environmental-economic efficiency, the Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP), to investigate the effect of China’s mandated air quality disclosure program from 2003 to 2016. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that cities subject to disclosure experienced an average decline of 8% in GTFP. To further explore the heterogeneity in the treatment effect, we apply causal forest, a state-of-the-art causal machine learning technique for estimating individual treatment effects. The analysis uncovers substantial variation in the impact of information disclosure across cities, suggesting that the negative average effect may be partially attributed to mistargeting. We identify financial constraints, industrial composition, and urban scale as key moderators of the disclosure program’s effectiveness. Moreover, our findings indicate that disclosing negative information, such as severe pollution levels or low environmental rankings, has a more pronounced impact compared to neutral content. By identifying key moderators and differential impacts of disclosure content, this study provides a foundation for targeted policy design to enhance the effectiveness of environmental information regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Deng & Qianqian Yue & Xin Zhao, 2024. "What Does Air Quality Information Disclosure Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from the Ambient Air Quality Standard (2012) Program in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(11), pages 2859-2887, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:87:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00911-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00911-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-024-00911-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10640-024-00911-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information disclosure; GTFP; Causal forest; Air quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:87:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00911-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.