IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v224y2024ics0921800924001745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The environmental effectiveness of water quality trading: Evidence from emissions trading programs in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hao
  • Ploegmakers, Huub
  • van der Krabben, Erwin
  • Meijerink, Sander

Abstract

Using a comprehensive dataset compiled to document all water quality trading programs in China, this paper presents a systematic evaluation of this market-based policy approach to pollution control. We offer new evidence on the question of whether quality improvements in surface waters with water quality trading have exceeded those in areas that were only subject to more traditional regulations during the same time period. Our research design compares ambient water pollution at monitoring sites downstream of areas that saw the establishment of water quality trading programs relative to pollution at sites without such upstream programs. The findings indicate that water quality trading does not have a discernible impact on ambient water quality. These results are robust to using alternative measures of the presence and extent of upstream water quality trading. Furthermore, event study graphs provide no indication that water pollution has decreased in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hao & Ploegmakers, Huub & van der Krabben, Erwin & Meijerink, Sander, 2024. "The environmental effectiveness of water quality trading: Evidence from emissions trading programs in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001745
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001745
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.