IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v51y2017i1p250-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Solutions to a Real-World Integrated Airline Scheduling Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Cacchiani

    (DEI, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Juan-José Salazar-González

    (DMEIO, Universidad de La Laguna, 38271 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain)

Abstract

We study an integrated airline scheduling problem for a regional carrier. It integrates three stages of the planning process (i.e., fleet assignment, aircraft routing, and crew pairing) that are typically solved in sequence. Aircraft maintenance is also taken into account. The objective function aims at minimizing a weighted sum of the number of aircraft routes, the number of crew pairings, and the waiting times of crews between consecutive flights. In addition, it aims at maximizing the robustness of the solution by also minimizing the number of times that crews need to change aircraft. We present two mixed integer linear programming models for the integrated problem. The first formulation, called the path-path model , can be considered as the “natural model” in which both the crew pairings and the aircraft routes are represented by path-based variables. The other formulation, called the arc-path model , is a novel model in which the aircraft routes are represented by arc-based variables and the crew pairings by path-based variables. We propose two exact methods (called path-path method and arc-path method) for solving the integrated problem, each one based on one of the proposed models. Both methods consist of three phases. In the first phase, the linear programming relaxation of the corresponding model is solved to optimality by column generation on the path-based variables, thus providing a lower bound. The second phase computes a heuristic solution (upper bound) by using only the variables generated in the first phase. The third phase makes use of the lower and upper bounds (obtained in the previous phases) to compute an optimal solution. We propose a bounding cut based on computing a lower bound on the number of aircraft changes that are needed in a feasible solution, and empirically show that this cut significantly speeds up the exact methods. The proposed methods are tested on real-world instances of a regional carrier with up to 172 flights and three fleet operators. The results show that the arc-path method outperforms the path-path method as well as a heuristic approach from the literature, and derives the optimal solutions for all of the considered instances in at most two hours of computing time.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Cacchiani & Juan-José Salazar-González, 2017. "Optimal Solutions to a Real-World Integrated Airline Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 250-268, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:51:y:2017:i:1:p:250-268
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2015.0655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego Klabjan, 2005. "Large-Scale Models in the Airline Industry," Springer Books, in: Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers & Marius M. Solomon (ed.), Column Generation, chapter 0, pages 163-195, Springer.
    2. Rivi Sandhu & Diego Klabjan, 2007. "Integrated Airline Fleeting and Crew-Pairing Decisions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 439-456, June.
    3. Diego Klabjan & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Eric Gelman & Srini Ramaswamy, 2002. "Airline Crew Scheduling with Time Windows and Plane-Count Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 337-348, August.
    4. Chunhua Gao & Ellis Johnson & Barry Smith, 2009. "Integrated Airline Fleet and Crew Robust Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 2-16, February.
    5. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1981. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 464-484, June.
    6. Michelle Dunbar & Gary Froyland & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2012. "Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 204-216, May.
    7. Zhe Liang & Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse, 2013. "A Network-Based Model for the Integrated Weekly Aircraft Maintenance Routing and Fleet Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 493-507, November.
    8. João P. Pita & Cynthia Barnhart & António P. Antunes, 2013. "Integrated Flight Scheduling and Fleet Assignment Under Airport Congestion," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 477-492, November.
    9. Jean-François Cordeau & Goran Stojković & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Benders Decomposition for Simultaneous Aircraft Routing and Crew Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 375-388, November.
    10. Amy Mainville Cohn & Cynthia Barnhart, 2003. "Improving Crew Scheduling by Incorporating Key Maintenance Routing Decisions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 387-396, June.
    11. Shan Lan & John-Paul Clarke & Cynthia Barnhart, 2006. "Planning for Robust Airline Operations: Optimizing Aircraft Routings and Flight Departure Times to Minimize Passenger Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 15-28, February.
    12. F M Zeghal & M Haouari & H D Sherali & N Aissaoui, 2011. "Flexible aircraft fleeting and routing at TunisAir," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 368-380, February.
    13. Hanif D. Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2010. "Integrated Airline Schedule Design and Fleet Assignment: Polyhedral Analysis and Benders' Decomposition Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 500-513, November.
    14. Anne Mercier, 2008. "A Theoretical Comparison of Feasibility Cuts for the Integrated Aircraft-Routing and Crew-Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 87-104, February.
    15. Manoj Lohatepanont & Cynthia Barnhart, 2004. "Airline Schedule Planning: Integrated Models and Algorithms for Schedule Design and Fleet Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 19-32, February.
    16. Gary Froyland & Stephen J. Maher & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2014. "The Recoverable Robust Tail Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 351-372, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quesnel, Frédéric & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2020. "A branch-and-price heuristic for the crew pairing problem with language constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1040-1054.
    2. Ben Ahmed, Mohamed & Zeghal Mansour, Farah & Haouari, Mohamed, 2018. "Robust integrated maintenance aircraft routing and crew pairing," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 15-31.
    3. Kenan, Nabil & Jebali, Aida & Diabat, Ali, 2018. "The integrated aircraft routing problem with optional flights and delay considerations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 355-375.
    4. Wen, Xin & Chung, Sai-Ho & Ji, Ping & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2022. "Individual scheduling approach for multi-class airline cabin crew with manpower requirement heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Ding, Chengjin & Chen, Xinyuan & Wu, Weiwei & Wei, Wenbin & Xin, Zelin, 2023. "Game-theoretic analysis of the impact of crew overnight hotel cost on airlines’ fleet assignment and crew pairing," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Xu, Yifan & Wandelt, Sebastian & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Airline integrated robust scheduling with a variable neighborhood search based heuristic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 181-203.
    7. Wen, Xin & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Chung, Sai-Ho & Khan, Waqar Ahmed, 2020. "Robust airline crew scheduling with flight flying time variability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Ted Gifford & Tracy Opicka & Ashesh Sinha & Daniel Vanden Brink & Andy Gifford & Robert Randall, 2018. "Dispatch Optimization in Bulk Tanker Transport Operations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 403-421, October.
    9. Cacchiani, Valentina & Salazar-González, Juan-José, 2020. "Heuristic approaches for flight retiming in an integrated airline scheduling problem of a regional carrier," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Faust & Jochen Gönsch & Robert Klein, 2017. "Demand-Oriented Integrated Scheduling for Point-to-Point Airlines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 196-213, February.
    2. Hanif D. Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "An Integrated Approach for Airline Flight Selection and Timing, Fleet Assignment, and Aircraft Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 455-476, November.
    3. Zhe Liang & Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse, 2013. "A Network-Based Model for the Integrated Weekly Aircraft Maintenance Routing and Fleet Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 493-507, November.
    4. Okan Örsan Özener & Melda Örmeci Matoğlu & Güneş Erdoğan & Mohamed Haouari & Hasan Sözer, 2017. "Solving a large-scale integrated fleet assignment and crew pairing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 477-500, June.
    5. Shengzhi Shao & Hanif D. Sherali & Mohamed Haouari, 2017. "A Novel Model and Decomposition Approach for the Integrated Airline Fleet Assignment, Aircraft Routing, and Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 233-249, February.
    6. Sebastian Ruther & Natashia Boland & Faramroze G. Engineer & Ian Evans, 2017. "Integrated Aircraft Routing, Crew Pairing, and Tail Assignment: Branch-and-Price with Many Pricing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 177-195, February.
    7. Qiang Meng & Shuaian Wang & Henrik Andersson & Kristian Thun, 2014. "Containership Routing and Scheduling in Liner Shipping: Overview and Future Research Directions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 265-280, May.
    8. Chunhua Gao & Ellis Johnson & Barry Smith, 2009. "Integrated Airline Fleet and Crew Robust Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 2-16, February.
    9. Liang, Zhe & Feng, Yuan & Zhang, Xiaoning & Wu, Tao & Chaovalitwongse, Wanpracha Art, 2015. "Robust weekly aircraft maintenance routing problem and the extension to the tail assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 238-259.
    10. Atoosa Kasirzadeh & Mohammed Saddoune & François Soumis, 2017. "Airline crew scheduling: models, algorithms, and data sets," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 111-137, June.
    11. Mohammed Saddoune & Guy Desaulniers & Issmail Elhallaoui & François Soumis, 2012. "Integrated Airline Crew Pairing and Crew Assignment by Dynamic Constraint Aggregation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 39-55, February.
    12. Mohamed Haouari & Shengzhi Shao & Hanif D. Sherali, 2013. "A Lifted Compact Formulation for the Daily Aircraft Maintenance Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 508-525, November.
    13. Ben Ahmed, Mohamed & Zeghal Mansour, Farah & Haouari, Mohamed, 2018. "Robust integrated maintenance aircraft routing and crew pairing," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 15-31.
    14. Mohamed Haouari & Farah Zeghal Mansour & Hanif D. Sherali, 2019. "A New Compact Formulation for the Daily Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 811-828, May.
    15. Zeighami, Vahid & Saddoune, Mohammed & Soumis, François, 2020. "Alternating Lagrangian decomposition for integrated airline crew scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 211-224.
    16. Hanif Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "A benders decomposition approach for an integrated airline schedule design and fleet assignment problem with flight retiming, schedule balance, and demand recapture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 213-244, November.
    17. Salazar-González, Juan-José, 2014. "Approaches to solve the fleet-assignment, aircraft-routing, crew-pairing and crew-rostering problems of a regional carrier," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 71-82.
    18. Xiao, Fan & Guo, Siqi & Huang, Lin & Huang, Lei & Liang, Zhe, 2022. "Integrated aircraft tail assignment and cargo routing problem with through cargo consideration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 328-351.
    19. Wen, Xin & Chung, Sai-Ho & Ji, Ping & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2022. "Individual scheduling approach for multi-class airline cabin crew with manpower requirement heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Gary Froyland & Stephen J. Maher & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2014. "The Recoverable Robust Tail Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 351-372, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:51:y:2017:i:1:p:250-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.