IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v60y2014i3p695-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yuji Nakagawa

    (Faculty of Informatics, Kansai University, Ryozenjicho, Takatsuki-shi 569, Japan)

  • Ross J. W. James

    (Department of Management, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand)

  • César Rego

    (School of Business Administration, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677)

  • Chanaka Edirisinghe

    (College of Business Administration, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996)

Abstract

This paper develops a new way to help solve difficult linear and nonlinear discrete-optimization decision models more efficiently by introducing a problem-difficulty metric that uses the concept of entropy from information theory. Our entropy metric is employed to devise rules for problem partitioning within an implicit enumeration method, where branching is accomplished based on the subproblem complexity. The only requirement for applying our metric is the availability of (upper) bounds on branching subproblems, which are often computed within most implicit enumeration methods such as branch-and-bound (or cutting-plane-based) methods. Focusing on problems with a relatively small number of constraints, but with a large number of variables, we develop a hybrid partitioning and enumeration solution scheme by combining the entropic approach with the recently developed improved surrogate constraint (ISC) method to produce the new method we call ISCENT. Our computational results indicate that ISCENT can be an order of magnitude more efficient than commercial solvers, such as CPLEX, for convex instances with no more than eight constraints. Furthermore, for nonconvex instances, ISCENT is shown to be significantly more efficient than other standard global solvers. This paper was accepted by Dimitris Bertsimas, optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:695-707
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1772
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ramazan Demir, 2002. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Multidimensional Knapsack Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 550-565, April.
    2. Clifford C. Petersen, 1967. "Computational Experience with Variants of the Balas Algorithm Applied to the Selection of R&D Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(9), pages 736-750, May.
    3. Prabhakant Sinha & Andris A. Zoltners, 1979. "The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 503-515, June.
    4. David W. Coit & Alice E. Smith & David M. Tate, 1996. "Adaptive Penalty Methods for Genetic Optimization of Constrained Combinatorial Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 173-182, May.
    5. María Osorio & Fred Glover & Peter Hammer, 2002. "Cutting and Surrogate Constraint Analysis for Improved Multidimensional Knapsack Solutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 71-93, November.
    6. Sanjiv Sarin & Mark H. Karwan & Ronald L. Rardin, 1987. "A new surrogate dual multiplier search procedure," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 431-450, June.
    7. Kurt M. Bretthauer & Bala Shetty, 1995. "The Nonlinear Resource Allocation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 670-683, August.
    8. Silvano Martello & Paolo Toth, 2003. "An Exact Algorithm for the Two-Constraint 0--1 Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 826-835, October.
    9. Mary W. Cooper, 1981. "A Survey of Methods for Pure Nonlinear Integer Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 353-361, March.
    10. Samir Elhedhli & Jean-Louis Goffin, 2005. "Efficient Production-Distribution System Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1151-1164, July.
    11. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Fred Glover, 1965. "A Multiphase-Dual Algorithm for the Zero-One Integer Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 879-919, December.
    13. Nauss, Robert M., 1978. "The 0-1 knapsack problem with multiple choice constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 125-131, March.
    14. Vasquez, Michel & Vimont, Yannick, 2005. "Improved results on the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 70-81, August.
    15. Jakob Puchinger & Günther R. Raidl & Ulrich Pferschy, 2010. "The Multidimensional Knapsack Problem: Structure and Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 250-265, May.
    16. Silvano Martello & David Pisinger & Paolo Toth, 1999. "Dynamic Programming and Strong Bounds for the 0-1 Knapsack Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 414-424, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edirisinghe, Chanaka & Jeong, Jaehwan, 2019. "Indefinite multi-constrained separable quadratic optimization: Large-scale efficient solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 49-63.
    2. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoon, Yourim & Kim, Yong-Hyuk & Moon, Byung-Ro, 2012. "A theoretical and empirical investigation on the Lagrangian capacities of the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 366-376.
    2. Renata Mansini & M. Grazia Speranza, 2012. "CORAL: An Exact Algorithm for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 399-415, August.
    3. Glover, Fred, 2013. "Advanced greedy algorithms and surrogate constraint methods for linear and quadratic knapsack and covering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 212-225.
    4. Abdelkader Sbihi, 2007. "A best first search exact algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 337-351, May.
    5. Alidaee, Bahram, 2014. "Zero duality gap in surrogate constraint optimization: A concise review of models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 241-248.
    6. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Ross, Anthony & Shetty, Bala, 1999. "Nonlinear integer programming for optimal allocation in stratified sampling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 667-680, August.
    7. Saïd Hanafi & Christophe Wilbaut, 2011. "Improved convergent heuristics for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 125-142, March.
    8. Deane, Jason & Agarwal, Anurag, 2012. "Scheduling online advertisements to maximize revenue under variable display frequency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 562-570.
    9. Nils Boysen & Simon Emde & Malte Fliedner, 2016. "The basic train makeup problem in shunting yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 207-233, January.
    10. Sung, C. S. & Cho, Y. K., 2000. "Reliability optimization of a series system with multiple-choice and budget constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 159-171, November.
    11. Yalçın Akçay & Haijun Li & Susan Xu, 2007. "Greedy algorithm for the general multidimensional knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 17-29, March.
    12. Wishon, Christopher & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2016. "Robust efficiency measures for linear knapsack problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 398-409.
    13. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Wilbaut, Christophe & Salhi, Saïd & Hanafi, Saïd, 2009. "An iterative variable-based fixation heuristic for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 339-348, December.
    15. Yanhong Feng & Hongmei Wang & Zhaoquan Cai & Mingliang Li & Xi Li, 2023. "Hybrid Learning Moth Search Algorithm for Solving Multidimensional Knapsack Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Raidl, Günther R., 2015. "Decomposition based hybrid metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 66-76.
    17. M Hifi & M Michrafy & A Sbihi, 2004. "Heuristic algorithms for the multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1323-1332, December.
    18. Wu, Jigang & Srikanthan, Thambipillai & Yan, Chengbin, 2008. "Algorithmic aspects for power-efficient hardware/software partitioning," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 1204-1215.
    19. Otto, Alena & Li, Xiyu, 2020. "Product sequencing in multiple-piece-flow assembly lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Cerqueus, Audrey & Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2015. "Surrogate upper bound sets for bi-objective bi-dimensional binary knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 417-433.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:695-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.