IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i8p1811-d1120627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Learning Moth Search Algorithm for Solving Multidimensional Knapsack Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhong Feng

    (School of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Intelligent Sensor Network Engineering Research Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Hongmei Wang

    (Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Information Engineering College, Ürümqi 830023, China)

  • Zhaoquan Cai

    (Shanwei Institute of Technology, Shanwei 516600, China
    School of Computer Science and Engineering, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)

  • Mingliang Li

    (School of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Intelligent Sensor Network Engineering Research Center of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Xi Li

    (School of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

Abstract

The moth search algorithm (MS) is a relatively new metaheuristic optimization algorithm which mimics the phototaxis and Lévy flights of moths. Being an NP-hard problem, the 0–1 multidimensional knapsack problem (MKP) is a classical multi-constraint complicated combinatorial optimization problem with numerous applications. In this paper, we present a hybrid learning MS (HLMS) by incorporating two learning mechanisms, global-best harmony search (GHS) learning and Baldwinian learning for solving MKP. (1) GHS learning guides moth individuals to search for more valuable space and the potential dimensional learning uses the difference between two random dimensions to generate a large jump. (2) Baldwinian learning guides moth individuals to change the search space by making full use of the beneficial information of other individuals. Hence, GHS learning mainly provides global exploration and Baldwinian learning works for local exploitation. We demonstrate the competitiveness and effectiveness of the proposed HLMS by conducting extensive experiments on 87 benchmark instances. The experimental results show that the proposed HLMS has better or at least competitive performance against the original MS and some other state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. In addition, the parameter sensitivity of Baldwinian learning is analyzed and two important components of HLMS are investigated to understand their impacts on the performance of the proposed algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhong Feng & Hongmei Wang & Zhaoquan Cai & Mingliang Li & Xi Li, 2023. "Hybrid Learning Moth Search Algorithm for Solving Multidimensional Knapsack Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1811-:d:1120627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1811/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1811/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Martin Weingartner & David N. Ness, 1967. "Methods for the Solution of the Multidimensional 0/1 Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 83-103, February.
    2. P. C. Gilmore & R. E. Gomory, 1966. "The Theory and Computation of Knapsack Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 1045-1074, December.
    3. Yoshiaki Toyoda, 1975. "A Simplified Algorithm for Obtaining Approximate Solutions to Zero-One Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(12), pages 1417-1427, August.
    4. Shizuo Senju & Yoshiaki Toyoda, 1968. "An Approach to Linear Programming with 0-1 Variables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 196-207, December.
    5. Wan-li Xiang & Mei-qing An & Yin-zhen Li & Rui-chun He & Jing-fang Zhang, 2014. "A Novel Discrete Global-Best Harmony Search Algorithm for Solving 0-1 Knapsack Problems," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-12, April.
    6. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Truong, Dinh-Nhat, 2021. "A novel metaheuristic optimizer inspired by behavior of jellyfish in ocean," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    7. Juan Li & Yuan-Hua Yang & Qing An & Hong Lei & Qian Deng & Gai-Ge Wang, 2022. "Moth Search: Variants, Hybrids, and Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Songyi Xiao & Wenjun Wang & Hui Wang & Dekun Tan & Yun Wang & Xiang Yu & Runxiu Wu, 2019. "An Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Based on Elite Strategy and Dimension Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Chengcheng Chen & Xianchang Wang & Helong Yu & Nannan Zhao & Mingjing Wang & Huiling Chen, 2020. "An Enhanced Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimizer with the Elite-Based Dominance Scheme," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-24, October.
    10. Chen, Chengcheng & Wang, Xianchang & Yu, Helong & Wang, Mingjing & Chen, Huiling, 2021. "Dealing with multi-modality using synthesis of Moth-flame optimizer with sine cosine mechanisms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 291-318.
    11. Vasquez, Michel & Vimont, Yannick, 2005. "Improved results on the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 70-81, August.
    12. Jakob Puchinger & Günther R. Raidl & Ulrich Pferschy, 2010. "The Multidimensional Knapsack Problem: Structure and Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 250-265, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakob Puchinger & Günther R. Raidl & Ulrich Pferschy, 2010. "The Multidimensional Knapsack Problem: Structure and Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 250-265, May.
    2. Setzer, Thomas & Blanc, Sebastian M., 2020. "Empirical orthogonal constraint generation for Multidimensional 0/1 Knapsack Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 58-70.
    3. Oliver Bastert & Benjamin Hummel & Sven de Vries, 2010. "A Generalized Wedelin Heuristic for Integer Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-107, February.
    4. Yalçın Akçay & Haijun Li & Susan Xu, 2007. "Greedy algorithm for the general multidimensional knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 17-29, March.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ramazan Demir, 2002. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Multidimensional Knapsack Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 550-565, April.
    6. Hanafi, Said & Freville, Arnaud, 1998. "An efficient tabu search approach for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 659-675, April.
    7. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2019. "Interdiction Games and Monotonicity, with Application to Knapsack Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 390-410, April.
    8. Renata Mansini & M. Grazia Speranza, 2012. "CORAL: An Exact Algorithm for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 399-415, August.
    9. Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
    10. Edward Y H Lin & Chung-Min Wu, 2004. "The multiple-choice multi-period knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 187-197, February.
    11. Deane, Jason & Agarwal, Anurag, 2012. "Scheduling online advertisements to maximize revenue under variable display frequency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 562-570.
    12. G. Edward Fox & Christopher J. Nachtsheim, 1990. "An analysis of six greedy selection rules on a class of zero‐one integer programming models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 299-307, April.
    13. Nils Boysen & Simon Emde & Malte Fliedner, 2016. "The basic train makeup problem in shunting yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 207-233, January.
    14. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Wilbaut, Christophe & Salhi, Saïd & Hanafi, Saïd, 2009. "An iterative variable-based fixation heuristic for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 339-348, December.
    16. Sabah Bushaj & İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın, 2024. "A K-means Supported Reinforcement Learning Framework to Multi-dimensional Knapsack," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 655-685, July.
    17. Balev, Stefan & Yanev, Nicola & Freville, Arnaud & Andonov, Rumen, 2008. "A dynamic programming based reduction procedure for the multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 63-76, April.
    18. Yalçin Akçay & Susan H. Xu, 2004. "Joint Inventory Replenishment and Component Allocation Optimization in an Assemble-to-Order System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 99-116, January.
    19. Chen, Yuning & Hao, Jin-Kao, 2014. "A “reduce and solve” approach for the multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 313-322.
    20. Lamanna, Leonardo & Mansini, Renata & Zanotti, Roberto, 2022. "A two-phase kernel search variant for the multidimensional multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 53-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1811-:d:1120627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.