IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v43y2024i2p419-439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlimited Testing: Let’s Test Your Emails with AI

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Nguyen

    (Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124)

  • Joseph Johnson

    (Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124)

  • Michael Tsiros

    (Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124)

Abstract

Testing email marketing effectiveness is an active research area because email remains an important channel for customer acquisition and retention. Email open rates are a key measure of campaign effectiveness. Scholars identify three predictors of open rates: recipients’ characteristics, headline characteristics, and sending time. The industry-favored A/B testing has three drawbacks: it takes hours, depletes lists available for main campaigns, and limits testable email versions because of sample size and power requirements. These limitations continue to motivate researchers to build and improve open rate prediction models. Although they reduce testing time, models developed in marketing use only recipients’ past open rates as predictors. By contrast, models in computer science typically use only email headline characteristics as predictors. Consequently, current models’ open rate prediction errors are high. The authors address the limitations of both literature streams and use all three predictors and machine learning to build an email open rate predictor (EMOP) based on their universal emotion detector (UED). They test EMOP on data from four brands and set state-of-the-art prediction results. Experimental validation shows that EMOP can pick the best headline from a set of professionally generated headlines. Also, UED ranked second at the SemEval 2018 Task 1 E-c competition as of January 5, 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Nguyen & Joseph Johnson & Michael Tsiros, 2024. "Unlimited Testing: Let’s Test Your Emails with AI," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 419-439, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:2:p:419-439
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2021.0126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.0126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2021.0126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navdeep S. Sahni & S. Christian Wheeler & Pradeep Chintagunta, 2018. "Personalization in Email Marketing: The Role of Noninformative Advertising Content," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 236-258, March.
    2. Eric M. Schwartz & Eric T. Bradlow & Peter S. Fader, 2017. "Customer Acquisition via Display Advertising Using Multi-Armed Bandit Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 500-522, July.
    3. Williams, Patti & Aaker, Jennifer L, 2002. "Can Mixed Emotions Peacefully Coexist?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(4), pages 636-649, March.
    4. Nathan M. Fong, 2017. "How Targeting Affects Customer Search: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2353-2364, July.
    5. Navdeep S. Sahni & Dan Zou & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2017. "Do Targeted Discount Offers Serve as Advertising? Evidence from 70 Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2688-2705, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arun Gopalakrishnan & Young-Hoon Park, 2021. "The Impact of Coupons on the Visit-to-Purchase Funnel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 48-61, January.
    2. Ratchford, Brian & Soysal, Gonca & Zentner, Alejandro & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 152-177.
    3. Rodriguez, Virginie & Sangle-Ferriere, Marion, 2023. "Do supermarkets’ emails have any value for their customers? The effect of emails’ content and interestingness on customers’ attitude and engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Yashar Bashirzadeh & Robert Mai & Corinne Faure, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03603041, HAL.
    5. Xiang Hui & Meng Liu & Tat Chan, 2022. "Targeted Incentives, Broad Impacts: Evidence from an E-commerce Platform," CESifo Working Paper Series 9894, CESifo.
    6. Matthew McGranaghan & Jura Liaukonyte & Geoffrey Fisher & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2019. "Lead Offer Spillovers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 643-668, July.
    7. Bashirzadeh, Yashar & Mai, Robert & Faure, Corinne, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 58-76.
    8. Kurt P. Munz & Minah H. Jung & Adam L. Alter, 2020. "Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1071-1091, November.
    9. Geoffrey Fisher & Matthew McGranaghan & Jura Liaukonyte & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2023. "Price promotions, beneficiary framing, and mental accounting," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 147-181, June.
    10. Paul B. Ellickson & Wreetabrata Kar & James C. Reeder, 2023. "Estimating Marketing Component Effects: Double Machine Learning from Targeted Digital Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 704-728, July.
    11. Yashar Bashirzadeh & Robert Mai & Corinne Faure, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," Post-Print hal-03603041, HAL.
    12. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    13. Sedgley, Diane & Pritchard, Annette & Morgan, Nigel & Hanna, Paul, 2017. "Tourism and autism: Journeys of mixed emotions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 14-25.
    14. Carattini, Stefano & Gillingham, Kenneth & Meng, Xiangyu & Yoeli, Erez, 2024. "Peer-to-peer solar and social rewards: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 340-370.
    15. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    16. Yu Ding & Wayne S. DeSarbo & Dominique M. Hanssens & Kamel Jedidi & John G. Lynch & Donald R. Lehmann, 2020. "The past, present, and future of measurement and methods in marketing analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 175-186, September.
    17. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    18. Koo, Minkyung & Shavitt, Sharon & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, 2020. "Engaging in a culturally mismatched thinking style increases the preference for familiar consumer options for analytic but not holistic thinkers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 837-852.
    19. Harikesh S. Nair & Sanjog Misra & William J. Hornbuckle IV & Ranjan Mishra & Anand Acharya, 2017. "Big Data and Marketing Analytics in Gaming: Combining Empirical Models and Field Experimentation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 699-725, September.
    20. Tang, Pok Man & Yam, Kai Chi & Koopman, Joel, 2020. "Feeling proud but guilty? Unpacking the paradoxical nature of unethical pro-organizational behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 68-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:2:p:419-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.