IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v33y2014i4p609-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Data Set of Brands and Their Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell Lovett

    (Simon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627)

  • Renana Peres

    (School of Business Administration, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 91905)

  • Ron Shachar

    (Arison School of Business, The Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya--IDC, Herzliya, Israel 46150)

Abstract

Brands stand at the core of marketing. They are central to positioning, marketing communications, word of mouth, customer relationships, and firm profits. Brands have been studied from multiple perspectives using a variety of measures and scales. We offer a data set that contains 136 different measures of the brand characteristics for almost 700 of the top U.S. national brands across 16 categories measured by 2010. These measures cover a broad range of characteristics including brand personality, satisfaction, age, attributes related to Rogers' innovation scheme such as complexity, and the four brand equity pillars of Young and Rubicam's BrandAsset Valuator. The data were collected from a combination of sources including an original survey on 4,769 subjects. In addition, we provide quarterly data on the variables available from the BrandAsset Valuator for two and a half years between 2008 and 2010. These data can be used as a building block in research that aims to explore the antecedents of brand perceptions or connect brand characteristics with market and financial outcomes. This paper describes the data and some relevant research questions.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0861 .

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell Lovett & Renana Peres & Ron Shachar, 2014. "A Data Set of Brands and Their Characteristics," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 609-617, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:33:y:2014:i:4:p:609-617
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2014.0861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0861
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2014.0861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    2. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Inge Geyskens, 2014. "Manufacturer and Retailer Strategies to Impact Store Brand Share: Global Integration, Local Adaptation, and Worldwide Learning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 6-26, January.
    3. Laband, David N, 1986. "Advertising as Information: An Empirical Note," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 68(3), pages 517-521, August.
    4. Ostlund, Lyman E, 1974. "Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(2), pages 23-29, Se.
    5. Ron Shachar & Tülin Erdem & Keisha M. Cutright & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2011. "Brands: The Opiate of the Nonreligious Masses?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 92-110, 01-02.
    6. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    7. Nelson, Philip, 1974. "Advertising as Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(4), pages 729-754, July/Aug..
    8. Zixia Cao & Alina Sorescu, 2013. "Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 939-959, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beth L. Fossen & David A. Schweidel, 2019. "Measuring the Impact of Product Placement with Brand-Related Social Media Conversations and Website Traffic," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 481-499, May.
    2. Winston Wei Dou & Yan Ji & David Reibstein & Wei Wu, 2021. "Inalienable Customer Capital, Corporate Liquidity, and Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(1), pages 211-265, February.
    3. Oliver Hinz & Shawndra Hill & Amit Sharma, 2022. "Second Screening—The Influence of Concurrent TV Consumption on Online Shopping Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 809-823, September.
    4. Jahanmir, Sara F. & Cavadas, Joana, 2018. "Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 337-343.
    5. Vilma Todri, 2022. "Frontiers: The Impact of Ad-Blockers on Online Consumer Behavior," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 7-18, January.
    6. Luo, Anita & Baker, Andrew & Donthu, Naveen, 2019. "Capturing dynamics in the value for brand recommendations from word-of-mouth conversations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 247-260.
    7. Rietveld, Robert & van Dolen, Willemijn & Mazloom, Masoud & Worring, Marcel, 2020. "What You Feel, Is What You Like Influence of Message Appeals on Customer Engagement on Instagram," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 20-53.
    8. Faramarzi, Ashkan & Bhattacharya, Abhi, 2021. "The economic worth of loyalty programs: An event study analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 313-323.
    9. Beth L. Fossen & Girish Mallapragada & Anwesha De, 2021. "Impact of Political Television Advertisements on Viewers’ Response to Subsequent Advertisements," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 305-324, March.
    10. Li, Ruiqin & Wang, Yan & Zhang, Hongli, 2023. "The shape of premiumness: Logo Shape's effects on perceived brand premiumness and brand preference," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Kristina Klein & Franziska Völckner & Hernán A. Bruno & Henrik Sattler & Pascal Bruno, 2019. "Brand Positioning Based on Brand Image–Country Image Fit," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 516-538, May.
    12. Christina Kuehnl & Danijel Jozic & Christian Homburg, 2019. "Effective customer journey design: consumers’ conception, measurement, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 551-568, May.
    13. Ko, Eunhee Emily & Bowman, Douglas, 2023. "Suspicious online product reviews: An empirical analysis of brand and product characteristics using Amazon data," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 898-911.
    14. Alberto Lopez & Eva Guerra & Beatriz Gonzalez & Sergio Madero, 2020. "Consumer sentiments toward brands: the interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 203-223, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goyal Vinay, 2019. "Brand Image and its Determinants: A Stochastic Frontier Approach Analysis," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, June.
    2. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    3. Robert B. Ekelund & Mark Thornton, 2019. "Extreme Credence and Imaginary Goods," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 47(3), pages 361-371, September.
    4. Linder, Christian & Seidenstricker, Sven, 2018. "How does a component from a supplier with high reputation for product innovation improve the perception of a final offering? A process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 288-299.
    5. Breeda Comyns & Frank Figge & Tobias Hahn & Ralf Barkemeyer, 2013. "Sustainability reporting: The role of “Search”, “Experience” and “Credence” information," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 231-243, September.
    6. Kim, Hye-Young & Lee, Min-Young, 2010. "Emotional loyalty and share of wallet: A contingency approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 333-339.
    7. Robert Bartels & Denzil Fiebig & Arthur Soest, 2006. "Consumers and experts: an econometric analysis of the demand for water heaters," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 369-391, June.
    8. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.
    9. Ernst, Holger & Wickede, Anje, 1999. "Einflußfaktoren auf die Glaubwürdigkeit kundenorientierter Produkt-Vorankündigungen: Ein signaltheoretischer Ansatz," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 515, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. Franklin G. Mixon & Chandini Sankaran & Kamal P. Upadhyaya, 2019. "Is Political Ideology Stable? Evidence from Long-Serving Members of the United States Congress," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Frankling Mixon & Len Trevino & Angel Bales, 2004. "Just-below Princing Strategies in the Music Industry: Empirical Evidence," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 165-174.
    12. Zhenhui Jiang & Izak Benbasat, 2007. "Research Note---Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 454-470, December.
    13. Stany Wee Lian Fong & Hishamuddin bin Ismail & Tan Pei Kian, 2023. "Reflective-Formative Hierarchical Component Model for Characteristic-Adoption Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    14. Franklin Mixon, 1999. "Customer return policies for experience goods: the impact of product price and consumer search costs on seller-provided informational cues," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 331-336.
    15. Suzuki, Satoko & Kanno, Saori, 2022. "The role of brand coolness in the masstige co-branding of luxury and mass brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 240-249.
    16. Atchara Leerapong, 2013. "Applying Diffusion of Innovation in Online Purchase Intention through Social Network: A Focus Group Study of Facebook in Thailand," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 144-154.
    17. Jacques Nel & Christo Boshoff, 2023. "Unraveling the link between status quo satisfaction and the rejection of digital-only banks," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 189-207, March.
    18. Huosong Xia & Zhe Hou, 2016. "Consumer use intention of online financial products: the Yuebao example," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Jayalaxmi P Shetty & Rajesh Panda, 2021. "An overview of cloud computing in SMEs," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 175-188, December.
    20. Groß, Michael, 2018. "Mobile shopping loyalty: The salient moderating role of normative and functional compatibility beliefs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 146-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:33:y:2014:i:4:p:609-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.