IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p943-d100467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Cover Changes (1963–2010) and Their Environmental Factors in the Upper Danube Floodplain

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Xu

    (Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

  • Annette Otte

    (Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

  • Kristin Ludewig

    (Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

  • Tobias W. Donath

    (Department of Landscape Ecology, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany)

  • Sarah Harvolk-Schöning

    (Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

Abstract

To analyze the changes in the Upper Danube Floodplain, we used aerial photos to quantify the change of landscape pattern from 1963 to 2010. We focused on typical floodplain habitats, i.e., riparian forest and floodplain grassland. We used landscape metrics and transformation matrix to explore changes in land cover structure and composition. The active floodplain experienced increasing fragmentation from 1963 to 2010. Despite an increase of aggregation, riparian forest suffered a 2.3% area loss from 1995 to 2010. Arable land in the active floodplain declined by 28.5%, while its patch size significantly increased. Elevation, distance to river and soil quality were the most relevant environmental factors for the land cover change in the floodplain. Higher soil quality or longer distance to river led to an increase of conversion from grassland into arable land; grassland patches with poorer soil quality were likely to change into riparian forest; riparian forest closer to the river and with a lower height above mean water level tended to remain stable. This comprehensive understanding of historical land cover change and environmental factors is needed for the enhancement of landscape functions and sustainable development in the floodplain.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Xu & Annette Otte & Kristin Ludewig & Tobias W. Donath & Sarah Harvolk-Schöning, 2017. "Land Cover Changes (1963–2010) and Their Environmental Factors in the Upper Danube Floodplain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:943-:d:100467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/943/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/943/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Thomas, 2006. "Property rights, land fragmentation and the emerging structure of agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(2), pages 225-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jana Podhrazska & Jan Szturc & Petr Karasek & Josef Kucera & Jana Konecna, 2019. "Economic impacts of farmland degradation in the Czech Republic - Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 529-538.
    2. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    3. Khatai ALIYEV & Elchin SULEYMANOV, 2015. "Macroeconomic Analysis and Graphical Interpretation of Azerbaijan Economy in 1991-2012," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(1), pages 40-49.
    4. Martin Drechsler & Julia Touza & Piran White & Glyn Jones, 2016. "Agricultural landscape structure and invasive species: the cost-effective level of crop field clustering," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 111-121, February.
    5. Ciaian, Pavel & Guri, Fatmir & Rajcaniova, Miroslava & Drabik, Dusan & Paloma, Sergio Gomez y, 2018. "Land fragmentation and production diversification: A case study from rural Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 589-599.
    6. Aliyev, Khatai, 2014. "Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 55096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sharofiddinov, Husniddin & Islam, Moinul & Kotani, Koji, 2024. "How does the number of water users in a land reform matter for water availability in agriculture?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Ciaian, Pavel & Guri, Fatmir & Rajcaniova, Miroslava & Drabik, Dusan & Paloma, Sergio, 2015. "Land Fragmentation, Production Diversification, and Food Security: A Case Study from Rural Albania," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211539, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Podhrázská Jana & Vaishar Antonín & Toman František & Knotek Jaroslav & Ševelová Miloslava & Stonawská Kateřina & Vasylchenko Alona & Karásek Petr, 2015. "Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 144-155, December.
    10. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Reti, Kinga-Olga, 2019. "My land is my food: Exploring social function of large land deals using food security–land deals relation in five Eastern European countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 729-741.
    11. Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Voss, Winrich & Bennett, Rohan & Rubanje, Innocent, 2021. "Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Arimoto, Yutaka, 2010. "Impact of land readjustment project on farmland use and structural adjustment: The case of Niigata, Japan," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61278, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Matsatso Tepnadze & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Duran Diaz & Quji Bichia, 2022. "An Experimental Study of the Social Dimension of Land Consolidation Using Trust Games and Public Goods Games," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Ognjen Žurovec & Pål Olav Vedeld, 2019. "Rural Livelihoods and Climate Change Adaptation in Laggard Transitional Economies: A Case from Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Ciaian, P. & Guri, F. & Rajcaniova, M. & Drabik, D. & Gomez Y Paloma, S., 2018. "Does Land Fragmentation Increase Agricultural Production Diversification in Rural Albania?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277093, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Tunalı, Safiye Pınar & Dağdelen, Necdet, 2023. "Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Andriy, Popov, 2016. "Заходи Щодо Подолання Наслідків Фрагментації Земель Сільськогосподарського Призначення: Європейський Досвід Та Українські Реалії," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    18. Pašakarnis, Giedrius & Maliene, Vida & Dixon-Gough, Robert & Malys, Naglis, 2021. "Decision support framework to rank and prioritise the potential land areas for comprehensive land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Rusu, Marioara & Florian, Violeta & Tudor, Monica & Chitea, Mihai & Chitea, Lorena & Rosu, Elisabeta, 2011. "Land Related Disputes and Conflicts in Romania," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 127-145.
    20. Akkaya Aslan, Şerife Tülin, 2021. "Evaluation of land consolidation projects with parcel shape and dispersion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:943-:d:100467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.