IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v7y2015i3p144-155n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Podhrázská Jana

    (Research Institute for Water and Soil Conservation Prague, 60200 Brno, Lidická 25/27)

  • Vaishar Antonín

    (CSc., Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Toman František

    (CSc., Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Knotek Jaroslav

    (Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Ševelová Miloslava

    (Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Stonawská Kateřina

    (Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Vasylchenko Alona

    (Mendel university in Brno, 61300 Brno, Zemědělská 1)

  • Karásek Petr

    (Research Institute for Water and Soil Conservation Prague, 60200 Brno, Lidická 25/27)

Abstract

The paper is focused on the current status of land consolidation in Czechia. The survey is based on a questionnaire distributed electronically to municipalities and related subjects (agricultural organizations, farmers) in areas where the land consolidation has been completed, is in progress, or is under preparation. Small farmers and municipality representatives perceive the land consolidation as a measure facilitating permeability of the landscape and protection from erosion and/or from flooding. Land consolidation is important for companies in clarification of the land ownerships and as a remedy for the landscape needs. About half of the respondents believe that the measures have rather brought benefits, whereas 41% of respondents mainly highlight problems. The negative side of the land consolidation is mostly seen in the time delays and demanding administration; agribusinesses also point out complications with land management. Nevertheless, 75% of small farmers and municipalities and 62% of agribusinesses are interested in land consolidation. The main differences between small farmers and large companies consist in their attitude to reduction of the acreage of large plots and their division by common facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Podhrázská Jana & Vaishar Antonín & Toman František & Knotek Jaroslav & Ševelová Miloslava & Stonawská Kateřina & Vasylchenko Alona & Karásek Petr, 2015. "Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 144-155, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:144-155:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/euco-2015-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2015-0010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/euco-2015-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro Coelho, J. & Aguiar Pinto, P. & Mira da Silva, L., 2001. "A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs): a model and its application," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 179-195, June.
    2. Rognes, Jorn & Sky, Per Kare, 1998. "Mediation In The Norwegian Land Consolidation Courts," Working Papers 12808, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
    3. Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, 2002. "Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in Eastern European agriculture," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(7), pages 1005-1018.
    4. Joachim Thomas, 2006. "Property rights, land fragmentation and the emerging structure of agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(2), pages 225-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66, September.
    2. Jing Zhu & Siqi Ma & Qianyu Zhou, 2022. "Industrial Revitalization of Rural Villages via Comprehensive Land Consolidation: Case Studies in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Tunalı, Safiye Pınar & Dağdelen, Necdet, 2023. "Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Gonzalez, X.P. & Marey, M.F. & Alvarez, C.J., 2007. "Evaluation of productive rural land patterns with joint regard to the size, shape and dispersion of plots," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 52-62, January.
    5. Gonzalez, X. P. & Alvarez, C. J. & Crecente, R., 2004. "Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 31-43, October.
    6. Jiang, Yanfeng & Tang, Yu-Ting & Long, Hualou & Deng, Wu, 2022. "Land consolidation: A comparative research between Europe and China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Jana Podhrazska & Jan Szturc & Petr Karasek & Josef Kucera & Jana Konecna, 2019. "Economic impacts of farmland degradation in the Czech Republic - Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 529-538.
    8. Khatai ALIYEV & Elchin SULEYMANOV, 2015. "Macroeconomic Analysis and Graphical Interpretation of Azerbaijan Economy in 1991-2012," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(1), pages 40-49.
    9. Tomomi Tanaka, 2005. "Resource allocation with spatial externalities: Experiments on land consolidation," Experimental 0511004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Lina Peng & Yan Hu & Jiyun Li & Qingyun Du, 2017. "An Improved Evaluation Scheme for Performing Quality Assessments of Unconsolidated Cultivated Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Fang Xu & Annette Otte & Kristin Ludewig & Tobias W. Donath & Sarah Harvolk-Schöning, 2017. "Land Cover Changes (1963–2010) and Their Environmental Factors in the Upper Danube Floodplain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-37, June.
    12. Georgina Milne & Andrew William Byrne & Emma Campbell & Jordon Graham & John McGrath & Raymond Kirke & Wilma McMaster & Jesko Zimmermann & Adewale Henry Adenuga, 2022. "Quantifying Land Fragmentation in Northern Irish Cattle Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Martin Drechsler & Julia Touza & Piran White & Glyn Jones, 2016. "Agricultural landscape structure and invasive species: the cost-effective level of crop field clustering," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 111-121, February.
    15. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Carletto, Calogero, 2012. "Land Fragmentation, Cropland Abandonment, and Land Market Operation in Albania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 2108-2122.
    16. Sky, Per Kåre & Elvestad, Helén Elisabeth, 2021. "Land consolidation cases relating to grazing arrangements," CLTS Working Papers 2/21, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies.
    17. Shuchang Li & Wei Song, 2023. "Research Progress in Land Consolidation and Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Characteristics, Regional Differences, and Evolution Laws," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Mengdi Zhang & Xiao Wang & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao, 2018. "Assessing the Potential of Rural Settlement Land Consolidation in China: A Method Based on Comprehensive Evaluation of Restricted Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Demetris Demetriou & John Stillwell & Linda See, 2012. "An Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation: Theoretical Framework and Application of the Land-Redistribution Modules," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(4), pages 609-628, August.
    20. Li, Bingqing & Wang, Zhanqi & Chai, Ji & Zhang, Di, 2019. "Index system to assess implementation of strategic land use plans in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:144-155:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.