IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v127y2023ics026483772300056x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain

Author

Listed:
  • Tunalı, Safiye Pınar
  • Dağdelen, Necdet

Abstract

Reallocation of land is one of the most essential and challenging stages of land consolidation (LC) projects. In this study, the success of two different methods used in the reallocation phase was evaluated. One of these methods is interview-based reallocation, and the other is fuzzy logic-based reallocation method. The projects' success was determined by consolidation rate, number of enterprises, number of parcels per enterprise, average parcel size, and shareholding status of the parcels. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the project carried out by both methods was successful. Consolidation rate, number of enterprises, and average parcel size values give better results with the fuzzy logic method. The number of parcels per enterprise turned out to be equal (1) in both methods. It was found that the number of single shares in the shareholding status of the parcels is higher in the fuzzy logic method. It was also revealed that single share parcel areas are more in the interview-based distribution method. It is possible to say that the fuzzy logic method is more successful than the interview-based method.

Suggested Citation

  • Tunalı, Safiye Pınar & Dağdelen, Necdet, 2023. "Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300056x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772300056X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro Coelho, J. & Aguiar Pinto, P. & Mira da Silva, L., 2001. "A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs): a model and its application," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 179-195, June.
    2. Ertunç, Ela & Çay, Tayfun & Haklı, Hüseyin, 2018. "Modeling of reallocation in land consolidation with a hybrid method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 754-761.
    3. Joachim Thomas, 2006. "Property rights, land fragmentation and the emerging structure of agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(2), pages 225-275.
    4. Akkaya Aslan, Serife Tulin & Kirmikil, Muge & Gündoğdu, Kemal Sulhi & Arici, Ismet, 2018. "Reallocation model for land consolidation based on landowners’ requests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 463-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Asiama, K.O. & Bennett, R.M. & Zevenbergen, J.A. & Da Silva Mano, A., 2019. "Responsible consolidation of customary lands: A framework for land reallocation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 412-423.
    3. Ozsari, Sifa & Uguz, Harun & Hakli, Huseyin, 2021. "Implementation of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for interview problem in land consolidation: A case study in Konya/Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Podhrázská Jana & Vaishar Antonín & Toman František & Knotek Jaroslav & Ševelová Miloslava & Stonawská Kateřina & Vasylchenko Alona & Karásek Petr, 2015. "Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 144-155, December.
    5. Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Voss, Winrich & Bennett, Rohan & Rubanje, Innocent, 2021. "Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Zang, Yuzhu & Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Toward serving land consolidation on the table of sustainability: An overview of the research landscape and future directions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Inceyol, Yasar & Cay, Tayfun, 2022. "Comparison of traditional method and genetic algorithm optimization in the land reallocation stage of land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Jana Podhrazska & Jan Szturc & Petr Karasek & Josef Kucera & Jana Konecna, 2019. "Economic impacts of farmland degradation in the Czech Republic - Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 529-538.
    11. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66, September.
    12. Khatai ALIYEV & Elchin SULEYMANOV, 2015. "Macroeconomic Analysis and Graphical Interpretation of Azerbaijan Economy in 1991-2012," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(1), pages 40-49.
    13. Lina Peng & Yan Hu & Jiyun Li & Qingyun Du, 2017. "An Improved Evaluation Scheme for Performing Quality Assessments of Unconsolidated Cultivated Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Fang Xu & Annette Otte & Kristin Ludewig & Tobias W. Donath & Sarah Harvolk-Schöning, 2017. "Land Cover Changes (1963–2010) and Their Environmental Factors in the Upper Danube Floodplain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-37, June.
    15. Martin Drechsler & Julia Touza & Piran White & Glyn Jones, 2016. "Agricultural landscape structure and invasive species: the cost-effective level of crop field clustering," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 111-121, February.
    16. Shuchang Li & Wei Song, 2023. "Research Progress in Land Consolidation and Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Characteristics, Regional Differences, and Evolution Laws," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Mengdi Zhang & Xiao Wang & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao, 2018. "Assessing the Potential of Rural Settlement Land Consolidation in China: A Method Based on Comprehensive Evaluation of Restricted Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Demetris Demetriou & John Stillwell & Linda See, 2012. "An Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation: Theoretical Framework and Application of the Land-Redistribution Modules," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(4), pages 609-628, August.
    19. Li, Bingqing & Wang, Zhanqi & Chai, Ji & Zhang, Di, 2019. "Index system to assess implementation of strategic land use plans in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Min Xia & Linyan Wang & Bo Wen & Wei Zou & Weixin Ou & Zhongqiong Qu, 2021. "Land Consolidation Zoning in Coastal Tidal Areas Based on Landscape Security Pattern: A Case Study of Dafeng District, Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300056x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.