IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v127y2023ics026483772300056x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain

Author

Listed:
  • Tunalı, Safiye Pınar
  • Dağdelen, Necdet

Abstract

Reallocation of land is one of the most essential and challenging stages of land consolidation (LC) projects. In this study, the success of two different methods used in the reallocation phase was evaluated. One of these methods is interview-based reallocation, and the other is fuzzy logic-based reallocation method. The projects' success was determined by consolidation rate, number of enterprises, number of parcels per enterprise, average parcel size, and shareholding status of the parcels. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the project carried out by both methods was successful. Consolidation rate, number of enterprises, and average parcel size values give better results with the fuzzy logic method. The number of parcels per enterprise turned out to be equal (1) in both methods. It was found that the number of single shares in the shareholding status of the parcels is higher in the fuzzy logic method. It was also revealed that single share parcel areas are more in the interview-based distribution method. It is possible to say that the fuzzy logic method is more successful than the interview-based method.

Suggested Citation

  • Tunalı, Safiye Pınar & Dağdelen, Necdet, 2023. "Comparison of different models for land consolidation projects: Aydin Yenipazar Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300056x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772300056X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro Coelho, J. & Aguiar Pinto, P. & Mira da Silva, L., 2001. "A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs): a model and its application," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 179-195, June.
    2. Joachim Thomas, 2006. "Property rights, land fragmentation and the emerging structure of agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(2), pages 225-275.
    3. Ertunç, Ela & Çay, Tayfun & Haklı, Hüseyin, 2018. "Modeling of reallocation in land consolidation with a hybrid method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 754-761.
    4. Akkaya Aslan, Serife Tulin & Kirmikil, Muge & Gündoğdu, Kemal Sulhi & Arici, Ismet, 2018. "Reallocation model for land consolidation based on landowners’ requests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 463-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Voss, Winrich & Bennett, Rohan & Rubanje, Innocent, 2021. "Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Inceyol, Yasar & Cay, Tayfun, 2022. "Comparison of traditional method and genetic algorithm optimization in the land reallocation stage of land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Asiama, K.O. & Bennett, R.M. & Zevenbergen, J.A. & Da Silva Mano, A., 2019. "Responsible consolidation of customary lands: A framework for land reallocation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 412-423.
    6. Ozsari, Sifa & Uguz, Harun & Hakli, Huseyin, 2021. "Implementation of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for interview problem in land consolidation: A case study in Konya/Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Podhrázská Jana & Vaishar Antonín & Toman František & Knotek Jaroslav & Ševelová Miloslava & Stonawská Kateřina & Vasylchenko Alona & Karásek Petr, 2015. "Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 144-155, December.
    8. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Zang, Yuzhu & Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Toward serving land consolidation on the table of sustainability: An overview of the research landscape and future directions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Jana Podhrazska & Jan Szturc & Petr Karasek & Josef Kucera & Jana Konecna, 2019. "Economic impacts of farmland degradation in the Czech Republic - Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 529-538.
    11. Demetris Demetriou & John Stillwell & Linda See, 2012. "An Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation: Theoretical Framework and Application of the Land-Redistribution Modules," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(4), pages 609-628, August.
    12. Jing Zhu & Siqi Ma & Qianyu Zhou, 2022. "Industrial Revitalization of Rural Villages via Comprehensive Land Consolidation: Case Studies in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Jianchun Fu & Shaoliang Zhang, 2021. "Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Reti, Kinga-Olga, 2019. "My land is my food: Exploring social function of large land deals using food security–land deals relation in five Eastern European countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 729-741.
    15. Khatai ALIYEV & Elchin SULEYMANOV, 2015. "Macroeconomic Analysis and Graphical Interpretation of Azerbaijan Economy in 1991-2012," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(1), pages 40-49.
    16. Qinglei Zhao & Guanghui Jiang & Mingzhu Wang, 2023. "The Allocation Change of Rural Land Consolidation Type Structure under the Influence Factors of Different Geographical and Economic Development of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Matsatso Tepnadze & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Duran Diaz & Quji Bichia, 2022. "An Experimental Study of the Social Dimension of Land Consolidation Using Trust Games and Public Goods Games," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Pham Phuong Nam & Bui Nguyen Hanh & Phan Thi Thanh Huyen & Nguyen Le Thuc Anh & Duong Thuy Ninh, 2023. "Accumulation and Concentration of Agricultural Land: A Case Study in Gia Binh District, Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 761-776, July.
    19. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Orea, Luis & Perez-Mendez, Jose A., 2019. "Rural and agricultural development by land consolidation: a spatial production analysis of Asturias´ parishes," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/04, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    20. Paweł Postek & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Przemysław Leń & Żanna Stręk, 2022. "Identifying Villages for Land Consolidation: A New Agricultural Land Erosion Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300056x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.