IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i12p2249-d121764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Production Scheduling with Customer Satisfaction Based Measurement for the Sustainability of Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Oh Shim

    (Department of Business Administration and Accounting, Hanbat National University, 125 Dongseo-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34158, Korea)

  • KyungBae Park

    (Department of Business Administration, Sangji University, 83 Sangjidae-gil, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26339, Korea)

  • SungYong Choi

    (Division of Business Administration, Yonsei University, 1 Yonseidae-gil, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26493, Korea)

Abstract

Scheduling problems for the sustainability of manufacturing firms in the era of the fourth industrial revolution is addressed in this research. In terms of open innovation, innovative production scheduling can be defined as scheduling using big data, cyber-physical systems, internet of things, cloud computing, mobile network, and so on. In this environment, one of the most important things is to develop an innovative scheduling algorithm for the sustainability of manufacturing firms. In this research, a flexible flowshop scheduling problem is considered with the properties of sequence-dependent setup and different process plans for jobs. In a flexible flowshop, there are serial workstations with multiple pieces of equipment that are able to process multiple lots simultaneously. Since the scheduling in this workshop is known to be extremely difficult, it is important to devise an efficient and effective scheduling algorithm. In this research, a heuristic algorithm is proposed based on a few dispatching rules and economic lot size model with the objective of minimizing total tardiness of orders. For the purposes of performance evaluation, a simulation study is conducted on randomly generated problem instances. The results imply that our proposed method outperforms the existing ones, and greatly enhances the sustainability of manufacturing firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Oh Shim & KyungBae Park & SungYong Choi, 2017. "Innovative Production Scheduling with Customer Satisfaction Based Measurement for the Sustainability of Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:2249-:d:121764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/12/2249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/12/2249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khouja, Moutaz & Michalewicz, Zgibniew & Wilmot, Michael, 1998. "The use of genetic algorithms to solve the economic lot size scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 509-524, November.
    2. Sang-Oh Shim & KyungBae Park, 2016. "Technology for Production Scheduling of Jobs for Open Innovation and Sustainability with Fixed Processing Property on Parallel Machines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    3. JinHyo Joseph Yun, 2017. "Dynamics of Open Innovation," Management for Professionals, in: Business Model Design Compass, chapter 7, pages 99-117, Springer.
    4. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    5. Rui Zhang, 2017. "Sustainable Scheduling of Cloth Production Processes by Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm with Tabu-Enhanced Local Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Yifei Tong & Jingwei Li & Shai Li & Dongbo Li, 2016. "Research on Energy-Saving Production Scheduling Based on a Clustering Algorithm for a Forging Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Verma, R., 1997. "Management science, theory of constraints/optimized production technology and local optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 189-200, April.
    8. Drexl, A. & Kimms, A., 1997. "Lot sizing and scheduling -- Survey and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 221-235, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Obradović, Tena & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Kimpimäki, Jaan-Pauli & Malacina, Iryna & Lähdeaho, Oskari, 2022. "Open and sustainable: An emerging frontier in innovation management?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Belén Payán-Sánchez & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Diego Vazquez-Brust & Natalia Yakovleva & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2021. "Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Kwangho Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2018. "Open Innovation of James Watt and Steve Jobs: Insights for Sustainability of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Andrea Celone & Antonello Cammarano & Mauro Caputo & Francesca Michelino, 2022. "Features of Sustainability-Oriented Innovations: A Content Analysis of Patent Abstracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Sudesh Sheoran & Sanket Vij, 2023. "A Consumer-Centric Paradigm Shift in Business Environment with the Evolution of the Internet of Things: A Literature Review," Vision, , vol. 27(4), pages 431-442, August.
    7. Julian Marius Müller & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2018. "What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Wenzhu Liao & Tong Wang, 2019. "A Novel Collaborative Optimization Model for Job Shop Production–Delivery Considering Time Window and Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Caizhi Sun & Ling Liu & Yanting Tang, 2018. "Measuring the Inclusive Growth of China’s Coastal Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Francesca Michelino & Antonello Cammarano & Andrea Celone & Mauro Caputo, 2019. "The Linkage between Sustainability and Innovation Performance in IT Hardware Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. SungYong Choi & KyungBae Park & Sang-Oh Shim, 2019. "The Optimal Emission Decisions of Sustainable Production with Innovative Baseline Credit Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Wenzhu Liao & Tong Wang, 2018. "Promoting Green and Sustainability: A Multi-Objective Optimization Method for the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Zhang, 2017. "Sustainable Scheduling of Cloth Production Processes by Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm with Tabu-Enhanced Local Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Wolosewicz, Cathy & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Aggoune, Riad, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic for an integrated lot-sizing and fixed scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 3-12.
    3. Zhenying Zhao & Michael Ball & Masahiro Kotake, 2005. "Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 65-85, March.
    4. Corti, Donatella & Pozzetti, Alessandro & Zorzini, Marta, 2006. "A capacity-driven approach to establish reliable due dates in a MTO environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 536-554, December.
    5. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    6. Meyr, H., 2000. "Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling by combining local search with dual reoptimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 311-326, January.
    7. X. Cai & F. S. Tu, 1996. "Scheduling jobs with random processing times on a single machine subject to stochastic breakdowns to minimize early‐tardy penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(8), pages 1127-1146, December.
    8. Sarper, H. & Henry, M. C., 1996. "Combinatorial evaluation of six dispatching rules in a dynamic two-machine flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 73-81, February.
    9. Rossi, Tommaso & Pozzi, Rossella & Testa, Mariapaola, 2017. "EOQ-based inventory management in single-machine multi-item systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 106-113.
    10. Schmid, Verena & Doerner, Karl F. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 435-448.
    11. Oscar F. Bustinza & Ferrán Vendrell-Herrero & Francisco J. Sánchez-Montesinos & José Antonio Campos-Granados, 2021. "Should Manufacturers Support the Entire Product Lifecycle with Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Nekoiemehr, Nooshin & Zhang, Guoqing & Selvarajah, Esaignani, 2019. "Due date quotation in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 102-111.
    13. Raaymakers, W. H. M. & Weijters, A. J. M. M., 2003. "Makespan estimation in batch process industries: A comparison between regression analysis and neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 14-30, February.
    14. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2017. "Open Innovation in Value Chain for Sustainability of Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, May.
    15. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    16. Philip Kaminsky & Onur Kaya, 2008. "Scheduling and due‐date quotation in a make‐to‐order supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(5), pages 444-458, August.
    17. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2018. "An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1302-1314, December.
    19. Almeder, Christian, 2010. "A hybrid optimization approach for multi-level capacitated lot-sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 599-606, January.
    20. Haugen, Kjetil K. & Olstad, Asmund & Pettersen, Bard I., 2007. "The profit maximizing capacitated lot-size (PCLSP) problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 165-176, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:2249-:d:121764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.