IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v41y1994i1p17-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines

Author

Listed:
  • Prabuddha De
  • Jay B. Ghosh
  • Charles E. Wells

Abstract

This article examines the problem of simultaneously assigning a common due date to a set of independent jobs and scheduling them on identical parallel machines in such a way that the costs associated with the due date and with the earliness or tardiness of the jobs are minimized. We establish that, for certain values of the due‐date cost, an optimal schedule for this problem is also optimal for an early/tardy scheduling problem studied by Emmons. We discuss the solution properties for the two problems, and show that both problems are NP‐hard even for two machines. We further show that these problems become strongly NP‐hard if the number of machines is allowed to be arbitrary. We provide a dynamic programming solution for the problems, the complexity of which indicates that the problems can be solved in pseudopolynomial time as long as the number of machines remains fixed. Finally, we present the results of a limited computational study. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:1:p:17-32
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199402)41:13.0.CO;2-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199402)41:13.0.CO;2-X
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199402)41:13.0.CO;2-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. L. Lawler & J. M. Moore, 1969. "A Functional Equation and its Application to Resource Allocation and Sequencing Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 77-84, September.
    2. S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith & A. Seidmann, 1982. "Common Due Date Assignment to Minimize Total Penalty for the One Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 391-399, April.
    3. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    4. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    5. Nicholas G. Hall, 1986. "Single‐ and multiple‐processor models for minimizing completion time variance," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 49-54, February.
    6. Hamilton Emmons, 1987. "Scheduling to a common due date on parallel uniform processors," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 803-810, December.
    7. Uttarayan Bagchi & Yih‐Long Chang & Robert S. Sullivan, 1987. "Minimizing absolute and squared deviations of completion times with different earliness and tardiness penalties and a common due date," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 739-751, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard Dickman & Yonah Wilamowsky & Sheldon Epstein, 2001. "Multiple common due dates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 293-298, June.
    2. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Zhi-Long Chen, 1997. "Scheduling with batch setup times and earliness-tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 518-537, February.
    4. Cai, X., 1995. "Minimization of agreeably weighted variance in single machine systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 576-592, September.
    5. Cai, X. & Lum, V. Y. S. & Chan, J. M. T., 1997. "Scheduling about a common due date with kob-dependent asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 154-168, April.
    6. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2014. "Single machine just‐in‐time scheduling problems with two competing agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 1-16, February.
    7. X. Cai & S. Zhou, 1997. "Scheduling stochastic jobs with asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(6), pages 531-557, September.
    8. Adamopoulos, G. I. & Pappis, C. P., 1996. "Scheduling jobs with different, job-dependent earliness and tardiness penalties using the SLK method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 336-344, January.
    9. Xia, Yu & Chen, Bintong & Yue, Jinfeng, 2008. "Job sequencing and due date assignment in a single machine shop with uncertain processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 63-75, January.
    10. Adamopoulos, George I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1998. "Scheduling under a common due-data on parallel unrelated machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 494-501, March.
    11. Awi Federgruen & Gur Mosheiov, 1993. "Simultaneous optimization of efficiency and performance balance measures in single‐machine scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 951-970, December.
    12. Lin, Shih-Wei & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2007. "A sequential exchange approach for minimizing earliness-tardiness penalties of single-machine scheduling with a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1294-1301, March.
    13. T C E Cheng & L Y Kang & C T Ng, 2007. "Due-date assignment and parallel-machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1103-1108, August.
    14. Andreas C. Nearchou & Sotiris L. Omirou, 2024. "Self-Adaptive Biased Differential Evolution for Scheduling Against Common Due Dates," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, June.
    15. T. C. E. Cheng & H. G. Kahlbacher, 1991. "A proof for the longest‐job‐first policy in one‐machine scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 715-720, October.
    16. Adamopoulos, George I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1996. "A fuzzy-linguistic approach to a multi-criteria sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 628-636, August.
    17. Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Lejmi, Tahar, 1999. "Scheduling for non regular performance measure under the due window approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 555-568, October.
    18. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    19. Adamopoulos, G. I. & Pappis, C. P., 1995. "The CON due-date determination method with processing time-dependent lateness penalties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 29-36, June.
    20. Soroush, H. M., 1999. "Sequencing and due-date determination in the stochastic single machine problem with earliness and tardiness costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 450-468, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:1:p:17-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.