IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p2021-d117520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Livestock Farming and Tourism Coexist in Mountain Regions? A New Business Model for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Dino Genovese

    (Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco 10095, Italy)

  • Francesca Culasso

    (Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin 10134, Italy)

  • Elisa Giacosa

    (Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin 10134, Italy)

  • Luca Maria Battaglini

    (Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco 10095, Italy)

Abstract

European Mediterranean mountain regions have been characterized by a sort of competition between the tourism sector and the agro-silvo-pastoral system, which in recent years has contributed to generate a continuous decline of the second one. Nevertheless, Pasture-based Livestock Farming Systems (PLSFS) are relevant for their role in the management and conservation of large High Nature Value (HNV) farmlands in Europe. The goal of our research is therefore to analyze what are the main features of farming organizations in the Italian alpine mountains and how they may be combined into inovative and sustainable business models (BM), characterized by the coexistence of agro-silvo-pastoral and touristic activities. By drawing upon the BM definition suggested by the Bocken’s et al. (2014), an exploratory case study has been analyzed; in particular, we propose the case study of the Lanzo Valleys, an alpine mountain region in the northwest of Italy, and the Toma di Lanzo Producers Association. The way a concrete and sustainable innovation in the more traditional BM could be supported only by the proactive intervention of a supra-farm dimension, while maintaining the peculiarities of the individual farms, is clearly shown in the article. A system of firms and institutions linked together in a collaborative relationship may represent a strong network, able to achieve the common goal of producing a sustainable development for the territory. Indeed, environment and cultural heritage may be preserved, as well as the economic perspective of farms reinforced, while the PLSFS could become more attractive for the tourism phenomenon. Interesting implications for farmers, policy makers and local institutions are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Dino Genovese & Francesca Culasso & Elisa Giacosa & Luca Maria Battaglini, 2017. "Can Livestock Farming and Tourism Coexist in Mountain Regions? A New Business Model for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2021-:d:117520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magali Aubert & Philippe Perrier‐Cornet, 2009. "Is there a future for small farms in developed countries? Evidence from the French case," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 797-806, November.
    2. Laura Broccardo & Francesca Culasso & Elisa Truant, 2017. "Unlocking Value Creation Using an Agritourism Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Frank Birkin & Thomas Polesie & Linda Lewis, 2009. "A new business model for sustainable development: an exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 277-290, July.
    4. Lambert, Susan C. & Davidson, Robyn A., 2013. "Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 668-681.
    5. Stefano Duglio & Riccardo Beltramo, 2017. "Estimating the Economic Impacts of a Small-Scale Sport Tourism Event: The Case of the Italo-Swiss Mountain Trail CollonTrek," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Muñoz-Ulecia, E. & Bernués, A. & Casasús, I. & Olaizola, A.M. & Lobón, S. & Martín-Collado, D., 2021. "Drivers of change in mountain agriculture: A thirty-year analysis of trajectories of evolution of cattle farming systems in the Spanish Pyrenees," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Paula Coutinho & Manuel Simões & Carlos Pereira & Teresa Paiva, 2021. "Sustainable Local Exploitation and Innovation on Meat Products Based on the Autochthonous Bovine Breed Jarmelista," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Rebecca Montrasio & Silvana Mattiello & Martina Zucaro & Dino Genovese & Luca Battaglini, 2020. "The Perception of Ecosystem Services of Mountain Farming and of a Local Cheese: An Analysis for the Touristic Valorization of an Inner Alpine Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Sørensen, Flemming & Grindsted, Thomas Skou, 2021. "Sustainability approaches and nature tourism development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Suresh Chaudhary & Yukuan Wang & Narendra Raj Khanal & Pei Xu & Bin Fu & Amod Mani Dixit & Kun Yan & Qin Liu & Yafeng Lu, 2018. "Social Impact of Farmland Abandonment and Its Eco-Environmental Vulnerability in the High Mountain Region of Nepal: A Case Study of Dordi River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Giovanni Peira & Damiano Cortese & Giampiero Lombardi & Luigi Bollani, 2020. "Grass-Fed Milk Perception: Profiling Italian Consumer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Rike Stotten & Michaela Maurer & Hannes Herrmann & Markus Schermer, 2019. "Different Forms of Accommodation in Agritourism: The Role of Decoupled Farmer-Based Accommodation in the Ötztal Valley (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Youxue Jiang & Shujin Wang, 2018. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Agritourism Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Sofia Karampela & George Papapanos & Thanasis Kizos, 2019. "Perceptions of Agritourism and Cooperation: Comparisons between an Island and a Mountain Region in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Michał Roman & Piotr Grudzień, 2021. "The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrizia Di Tullio & Diego Valentinetti & Michele Antonio Rea, 2018. "Integrating The Business Model Puzzle: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 9(1), pages 1-46, June.
    2. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    3. DESBOIS, Dominique, 2015. "La qualité du lait a-t-elle un prix ? Une estimation hédonique de la valeur des attributs spécifiques du lait de vache," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(3), September.
    4. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. William L. Smith & Yue Cai Hillon & Yanni Liang, 2019. "Reassessing measures of sustainable firm performance: A consultant's guide to identifying hidden costs in corporate disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 353-365, February.
    7. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    8. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    9. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2015. "Are short food supply chains a solution for farms facing financial difficulties?," Post-Print hal-02800273, HAL.
    10. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Stine Labes & Nicolai Hanner & Ruediger Zarnekow, 2017. "Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 223-233, August.
    12. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Ine Hugaerts & Jeroen Scheerder & Kobe Helsen & Joris Corthouts & Erik Thibaut & Thomas Könecke, 2021. "Sustainability in Participatory Sports Events: The Development of a Research Instrument and Empirical Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    15. Isaac Taberner & Albert Juncà, 2021. "Small-Scale Sport Events as Place Branding Platforms: A Content Analysis of Osona’s Projected Destination Image through Event-Related Pictures on Instagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Bignebat, C. & Bosc, P.M. & Perrier-Cornet, P., 2015. "A labour-based approach to the analysis of structural transformation: Application to French agricultural holdings 2000," Working Papers MoISA 201501, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    17. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    18. Enrica , Sofia Anna & Cavalleri & Grünbühel, Clemens M. & Tanwattana, Puntita, 2023. "Urban-Rural Links for Sustainable Food Consumption in Bangkok," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(01), January.
    19. Henrik Barth & Per-Ola Ulvenblad & Pia Ulvenblad, 2017. "Towards a Conceptual Framework of Sustainable Business Model Innovation in the Agri-Food Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Aubert, Magali & Enjoylras, Geoffroy, 2016. "Analyse financière des exploitations fruitières et maraîchères françaises qui vendent au détail," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 356(November-).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2021-:d:117520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.