IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i4p334-d67681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-Based Integration of Subjective and Objective Weighting Methods for Regional Landslides Susceptibility Mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Suhua Zhou

    (Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China
    Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan)

  • Guangqi Chen

    (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan)

  • Ligang Fang

    (Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China)

  • Yunwen Nie

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China)

Abstract

The development of landslide susceptibility maps is of great importance due to rapid urbanization. The purpose of this study is to present a method to integrate the subjective weight with objective weight for regional landslide susceptibility mapping on the geographical information system (GIS) platform. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP), which is subjective, was employed to weight predictive factors’ contribution to landslide occurrence. The frequency ratio (FR) method, which is objective, was used to derive subclasses’ frequency ratio with respect to landslides that indicate the relative importance of a subclass within each predictive factor. A case study was carried out at Tsushima Island, Japan, using a historical inventory of 534 landslides and seven predictive factors: elevation, slope, aspect, terrain roughness index (TRI), lithology, land cover and mean annual precipitation (MAP). The landslide susceptibility index (LSI) was calculated using the weighted linear combination of factors’ weights and subclasses’ weights. The study area was classified into five susceptibility zones according to the LSI. In addition, the produced susceptibility map was compared with maps generated using the conventional FR and AHP method and validated using the relative landslide index (RLI). The validation result showed that the proposed method performed better than the conventional application of the FR method and AHP method. The obtained landslide susceptibility maps could serve as a scientific basis for urban planning and landslide hazard management.

Suggested Citation

  • Suhua Zhou & Guangqi Chen & Ligang Fang & Yunwen Nie, 2016. "GIS-Based Integration of Subjective and Objective Weighting Methods for Regional Landslides Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:334-:d:67681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Ho Kil & Dong Kun Lee & Jun-Hyun Kim & Ming-Han Li & Galen Newman, 2016. "Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Establish Weighted Values for Evaluating the Stability of Slope Revegetation based on Hydroseeding Applications in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Qianqian Wang & Dongchuan Wang & Yong Huang & Zhiheng Wang & Lihui Zhang & Qiaozhen Guo & Wei Chen & Wengang Chen & Mengqin Sang, 2015. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Selected Optimal Combination of Landslide Predisposing Factors in a Large Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Paul Sestraș & Ștefan Bilașco & Sanda Roșca & Sanda Naș & Mircea V. Bondrea & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Vereș & Tudor Sălăgean & Velibor Spalević & Sorin M. Cîmpeanu, 2019. "Landslides Susceptibility Assessment Based on GIS Statistical Bivariate Analysis in the Hills Surrounding a Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Kang-Wook Lee & Wooyong Jung & Seung Heon Han, 2017. "Country Selection Model for Sustainable Construction Businesses Using Hybrid of Objective and Subjective Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Jay Simon, 2020. "Weight Approximation for Spatial Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Iris Bostjančić & Marina Filipović & Vlatko Gulam & Davor Pollak, 2021. "Regional-Scale Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Limited LiDAR-Based Landslide Inventories for Sisak-Moslavina County, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Guangming Cui & Xuliang Zhang & Zhaohui Zhang & Yinghui Cao & Xiujun Liu, 2019. "Comprehensive Land Carrying Capacities of the Cities in the Shandong Peninsula Blue Economic Zone and their Spatio-Temporal Variations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Sangseom Jeong & Azman Kassim & Moonhyun Hong & Nader Saadatkhah, 2018. "Susceptibility Assessments of Landslides in Hulu Kelang Area Using a Geographic Information System-Based Prediction Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Yanyan Li & Jianping Chen & Yanjun Shang, 2016. "An RVM-Based Model for Assessing the Failure Probability of Slopes along the Jinsha River, Close to the Wudongde Dam Site, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Laddyla Bezerra & Osvaldo de Freitas Neto & Olavo Santos & Slobodan Mickovski, 2020. "Landslide Risk Mapping in an Urban Area of the City of Natal, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Zhang & Minghui Zhang & Xin Liu & Berhanu Keno Terfa & Won-Ho Nam & Xihui Gu & Xu Zhang & Chao Wang & Jian Yang & Peng Wang & Chenghong Hu & Wenkui Wu & Nengcheng Chen, 2024. "Review on the progress and future prospects of geological disasters prediction in the era of artificial intelligence," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 11485-11525, October.
    2. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Seul-gi Lee & Bashir Adelodun & Mirza Junaid Ahmad & Kyung Sook Choi, 2022. "Multi-Level Prioritization Analysis of Water Governance Components to Improve Agricultural Water-Saving Policy: A Case Study from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. B. Senakumari Arunnima & Dharmaseelan Bijulal & R. Sudhir Kumar, 2023. "Open Innovation Intellectual Property Risk Maturity Model: An Approach to Measure Intellectual Property Risks of Software Firms Engaged in Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2020. "The Priority of Factors of Building Government as a Platform with Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Halil Akinci & Mustafa Zeybek, 2021. "Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1515-1543, September.
    7. Paul Sestraș & Ștefan Bilașco & Sanda Roșca & Sanda Naș & Mircea V. Bondrea & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Vereș & Tudor Sălăgean & Velibor Spalević & Sorin M. Cîmpeanu, 2019. "Landslides Susceptibility Assessment Based on GIS Statistical Bivariate Analysis in the Hills Surrounding a Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Jamal Jokar Arsanjani & Eric Vaz, 2017. "Special Issue Editorial: Earth Observation and Geoinformation Technologies for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-5, May.
    9. Sangseom Jeong & Azman Kassim & Moonhyun Hong & Nader Saadatkhah, 2018. "Susceptibility Assessments of Landslides in Hulu Kelang Area Using a Geographic Information System-Based Prediction Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Chuc Anh Tu & Tapan Sarker & Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Green Bond Market Expansion: Evidence from a Multi-Dimensional Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Cembranel, Priscila & Teixeira Dias, Felipe & Silva, Camilla Gomes da & Finatto, Carla Patricia & Guerra, José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade, 2023. "Sustainable universities: The LGBTQIAP+ inclusive model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Susana Martín-Fernández & Adrián Gómez-Serrano & Eugenio Martínez-Falero & Cristina Pascual, 2018. "Comparison of AHP and a Utility-Based Theory Method for Selected Vertical and Horizontal Forest Structure Indicators in the Sustainability Assessment of Forest Management in the Sierra de Guadarrama N," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    13. So Ra Park & Jae Young Jang, 2021. "The Impact of ESG Management on Investment Decision: Institutional Investors’ Perceptions of Country-Specific ESG Criteria," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Katarzyna A. Kurek & Wim Heijman & Johan Ophem & Stanisław Gędek & Jacek Strojny, 2022. "Measuring local competitiveness: comparing and integrating two methods PCA and AHP," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1371-1389, June.
    15. Derya Ozturk & Nergiz Uzel-Gunini, 2022. "Investigation of the effects of hybrid modeling approaches, factor standardization, and categorical mapping on the performance of landslide susceptibility mapping in Van, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2571-2604, December.
    16. Langping Li & Hengxing Lan, 2020. "Integration of Spatial Probability and Size in Slope-Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Rachida Senouci & Nasr-Eddine Taibi & Ana Cláudia Teodoro & Lia Duarte & Hamidi Mansour & Rabia Yahia Meddah, 2021. "GIS-Based Expert Knowledge for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM): Case of Mostaganem Coast District, West of Algeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Xiaoyan Li & Zipeng Qin & Yan Tian & Hongwei Zhang & Haitao Zhao & Jiafa Shen & Weilong Shao & Guangrong Jiang & Xianding Guo & Junsuo Zhang, 2022. "Study on Stability and Ecological Restoration of Soil-Covered Rocky Slope of an Abandoned Mine on an Island in Rainy Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Khydija Wakil & Malik Asghar Naeem & Ghulam Abbas Anjum & Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Muhammad Qadeer ul Hussnain & Raheel Nawaz, 2019. "A Hybrid Tool for Visual Pollution Assessment in Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Munjae Lee & Sewon Park & Kyu-Sung Lee, 2019. "What Are the Features of Successful Medical Device Start-Ups? Evidence from KOREA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:334-:d:67681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.