IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1153-d82533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Model of Inter-Organisational Cooperation for the Transition to a Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Ruggieri

    (Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via del Paradiso 47, 01100 Viterbo (VT), Italy)

  • Alessio Maria Braccini

    (Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via del Paradiso 47, 01100 Viterbo (VT), Italy)

  • Stefano Poponi

    (Faculty of Economics, Università degli Studi Niccolò Cusano, via Don Carlo Gnocchi 3, 00166 Roma, Italy)

  • Enrico Maria Mosconi

    (Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via del Paradiso 47, 01100 Viterbo (VT), Italy)

Abstract

The transition to a circular economy bodes well for a future of environmentally sustainable growth and economic development. The implications and advantages of a shift to a circular economy have been extensively demonstrated by the literature on the subject. What has not been sufficiently investigated is how this paradigm can be enabled through the inter-organisational cooperation among different business enterprises. In order to illustrate this point, in this paper we aim to contribute to the circular economy debate by describing and discussing such a meta-model of inter-organisational cooperation. The present study is therefore based on the analysis of three cases from an equal number of industries, from which we identified factors of potential impact for the stimulation of cooperation in a circular economy perspective. Last, but not least, we discuss the relations between the case studies and try to formulate all possible implications for both managers and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Ruggieri & Alessio Maria Braccini & Stefano Poponi & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2016. "A Meta-Model of Inter-Organisational Cooperation for the Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1153-:d:82533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, I-Shin & Zhao, Ji & Yin, Xuefeng & Wu, Jing & Jia, Zhibin & Wang, Lixin, 2011. "Comprehensive utilizations of biogas in Inner Mongolia, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1442-1453, April.
    2. Garrette Clark & Justin Kosoris & Long Nguyen Hong & Marcel Crul, 2009. "Design for Sustainability: Current Trends in Sustainable Product Design and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    4. Johannes Behrisch & Mariano Ramirez & Damien Giurco, 2011. "Representation of Ecodesign Practice: International Comparison of Industrial Design Consultancies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Colantoni & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Stefano Poponi, 2018. "Small-Scale Energy Conversion of Agro-Forestry Residues for Local Benefits and European Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Andrea Colantoni & Danilo Monarca & Vincenzo Laurendi & Mauro Villarini & Filippo Gambella & Massimo Cecchini, 2018. "Smart Machines, Remote Sensing, Precision Farming, Processes, Mechatronic, Materials and Policies for Safety and Health Aspects," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Ludovica Principato & Alessio Leo & Giovanni Mattia & Carlo Alberto Pratesi, 2021. "The next step in sustainable dining: the restaurant food waste map for the management of food waste," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(3), pages 189-207, September.
    4. Markku Anttonen & Minna Lammi & Juri Mykkänen & Petteri Repo, 2018. "Circular Economy in the Triple Helix of Innovation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Rena Kondo & Yuki Kinoshita & Tetsuo Yamada, 2019. "Green Procurement Decisions with Carbon Leakage by Global Suppliers and Order Quantities under Different Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Balint Horvath & Edmund Mallinguh & Csaba Fogarassy, 2018. "Designing Business Solutions for Plastic Waste Management to Enhance Circular Transitions in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Carolina Giraldo Nohra & Amina Pereno & Silvia Barbero, 2020. "Systemic Design for Policy-Making: Towards the Next Circular Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel & Benz, Lukas & Hartmann, Evi & Matzner, Martin, 2022. "Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Dan Ioan Topor & Dana-Maria Oprea Constantin & Andreea Marin-Pantelescu & Mihaela Ștefan Hint, 2018. "The Sustainability of Romanian SMEs and Their Involvement in the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    11. Denise Baden & Ken Peattie & Adekunle Oke, 2020. "Access Over Ownership: Case Studies of Libraries of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Xiu-Mei Fu & Han-Xue Chen & Zhen-Kai Xue, 2018. "Construction of the Belt and Road Trade Cooperation Network from the Multi-Distances Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Konstantinos G. Aravossis, 2019. "Investigation of Ecosystem Services and Circular Economy Interactions under an Inter-organizational Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    14. Andrea Cantú & Eduardo Aguiñaga & Carlos Scheel, 2021. "Learning from Failure and Success: The Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in SMEs in an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-35, February.
    15. Sittiporn Pimsakul & Premaratne Samaranayake & Tritos Laosirihongthong, 2021. "Prioritizing Enabling Factors of IoT Adoption for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Stefano Poponi & Gabriella Arcese & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Francesco Pacchera & Olimpia Martucci & Grazia Chiara Elmo, 2021. "Multi-Actor Governance for a Circular Economy in the Agri-Food Sector: Bio-Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Parakram Pyakurel & Laurie Wright, 2021. "Energy and resources cooperation for greenhouse gases emissions reduction of industrial sector," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(4), pages 635-647, June.
    18. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2021. "Examining the development of a digital ecosystem in an Industry 4.0 context: a sociotechnical perspective," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Matthias Kalverkamp & Alexandra Pehlken & Thorsten Wuest, 2017. "Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Stefano Poponi & Andrea Colantoni & Sirio R.S. Cividino & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2019. "The Stakeholders’ Perspective within the B Corp Certification for a Circular Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    21. Luca Secondi & Ludovica Principato & Luca Ruini & Matteo Guidi, 2019. "Reusing Food Waste in Food Manufacturing Companies: The Case of the Tomato-Sauce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    22. Hanna Lehtimäki & Ville-Veikko Piispanen & Kaisa Henttonen, 2020. "Strategic Decisions Related to Circular Business Model in a Forerunner Company: Challenges Due to Path Dependency and Lock-In," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(3), pages 402-412, December.
    23. Alessio Maria Braccini & Emanuele Gabriel Margherita, 2018. "Exploring Organizational Sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the Triple Bottom Line: The Case of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Poponi & Andrea Colantoni & Sirio R.S. Cividino & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2019. "The Stakeholders’ Perspective within the B Corp Certification for a Circular Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    5. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    7. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    8. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    12. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    13. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    14. Lamin B. Ceesay, 2020. "Exploring the Influence of NGOs in Corporate Sustainability Adoption: Institutional-Legitimacy Perspective," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 135-147, December.
    15. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    16. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    17. Broekhuis, Manda & Vos, Janita F.J., 2003. "Improving organizational sustainability using a quality perspective," Research Report 03A43, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    18. Marileena Koskela & Jarmo Vehmas, 2012. "Defining Eco‐efficiency: A Case Study on the Finnish Forest Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 546-566, December.
    19. Günther, Kathrin, 2016. "Key Factors for Successful Implementation of a Sustainability Strategy," Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology, vol. 4, pages 1-20.
    20. Yuan-Shuh Lii & May-Ching Ding & Chih-Huang Lin, 2018. "Fair or Unfair: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable CSR Practices on Anticipatory Justice Following Service Failure Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1153-:d:82533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.