IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3182-d1373478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Master–Slave Game Optimal Scheduling for Multi-Agent Integrated Energy System Based on Uncertainty and Demand Response

Author

Listed:
  • Boyu Zhu

    (School of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

  • Dazhi Wang

    (School of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

Abstract

With the transformation of the energy market from the traditional vertical integrated structure to the interactive competitive structure, the traditional centralized optimization method makes it difficult to reveal the interactive behavior of multi-agent integrated energy systems (MAIES). In this paper, a master–slave game optimal scheduling strategy of MAIES is proposed based on the integrated demand response. Firstly, a master–slave game framework of MAIES is established with an energy management agent as leader, an energy operation agent, an energy storage agent, and a user aggregation agent as followers. Secondly, in view of the wind and solar uncertainty, the Monte Carlo method is used to generate random scenarios, and the k-means clustering method and pre-generation elimination technology are used for scenario reduction. Then, according to different flexible characteristics of loads, a multi-load and multi-type integrated demand response model including electric, thermal, and cold energy is built to fully utilize the regulation role of flexible resources. On this basis, the transaction decision-making models of each agent are constructed, and the existence and uniqueness of the Stackelberg equilibrium solution are proved. Finally, the case simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed optimal scheduling strategy of MAIES. Compared to the scenario without considering the wind and solar uncertainty and the integrated demand response, the rate of renewable energy curtailment was reduced by 6.03% and the carbon emissions of the system were reduced by 1335.22 kg in the scenario considering the proposed method in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyu Zhu & Dazhi Wang, 2024. "Master–Slave Game Optimal Scheduling for Multi-Agent Integrated Energy System Based on Uncertainty and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3182-:d:1373478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiangnan Li & Tian Mao & Guanglei Huang & Wenmeng Zhao & Tao Wang, 2023. "Research on Day-Ahead Optimal Scheduling Considering Carbon Emission Allowance and Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Wei, F. & Jing, Z.X. & Wu, Peter Z. & Wu, Q.H., 2017. "A Stackelberg game approach for multiple energies trading in integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 315-329.
    3. Li, Bo & Li, Xu & Su, Qingyu, 2022. "A system and game strategy for the isolated island electric-gas deeply coupled energy network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Yi Zhang & Tian Lan & Wei Hu, 2023. "A Two-Stage Robust Optimization Microgrid Model Considering Carbon Trading and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Wang, Lixiao & Jing, Z.X. & Zheng, J.H. & Wu, Q.H. & Wei, Feng, 2018. "Decentralized optimization of coordinated electrical and thermal generations in hierarchical integrated energy systems considering competitive individuals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 607-622.
    4. Bhatti, Bilal Ahmad & Broadwater, Robert, 2019. "Energy trading in the distribution system using a non-model based game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Wang, Lu & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Qiu, Haifeng & Pan, Guangsheng, 2020. "Non-cooperative game-based multilateral contract transactions in power-heating integrated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Hou, Langbo & Tong, Xi & Chen, Heng & Fan, Lanxin & Liu, Tao & Liu, Wenyi & Liu, Tong, 2024. "Optimized scheduling of smart community energy systems considering demand response and shared energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    7. Wang, Shouxiang & Wang, Shaomin & Zhao, Qianyu & Dong, Shuai & Li, Hao, 2023. "Optimal dispatch of integrated energy station considering carbon capture and hydrogen demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Wang, Can & Yan, Chao & Li, Gengfeng & Liu, Shiyu & Bie, Zhaohong, 2020. "Risk assessment of integrated electricity and heat system with independent energy operators based on Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    10. Wang, L.X. & Zheng, J.H. & Li, M.S. & Lin, X. & Jing, Z.X. & Wu, P.Z. & Wu, Q.H. & Zhou, X.X., 2019. "Multi-time scale dynamic analysis of integrated energy systems: An individual-based model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 848-861.
    11. Anees, Amir & Dillon, Tharam & Chen, Yi-Ping Phoebe, 2019. "A novel decision strategy for a bilateral energy contract," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Meifang Wei & Youyue Deng & Min Long & Yahui Wang & Yong Li, 2022. "Transaction Model Based on Stackelberg Game Method for Balancing Supply and Demand Sides of Multi-Energy Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Wu, Qiong & Xie, Zhun & Ren, Hongbo & Li, Qifen & Yang, Yongwen, 2022. "Optimal trading strategies for multi-energy microgrid cluster considering demand response under different trading modes: A comparison study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    14. Su, Qingyu & Chen, Cong & Huang, Xin & Li, Jian, 2022. "Interval TrendRank method for grid node importance assessment considering new energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    15. Chen Zhang & Yong Wang & Tao Yang, 2020. "Iterative Auction for P2P Renewable Energy Trading with Dynamic Energy Storage Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Zhang, Xiaoyan & Zhu, Shanying & He, Jianping & Yang, Bo & Guan, Xinping, 2019. "Credit rating based real-time energy trading in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 985-996.
    17. Wang, Yifei & Wang, Xiuli & Shao, Chengcheng & Gong, Naiwei, 2020. "Distributed energy trading for an integrated energy system and electric vehicle charging stations: A Nash bargaining game approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 513-530.
    18. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    19. Jiajia Li & Jinfu Liu & Peigang Yan & Xingshuo Li & Guowen Zhou & Daren Yu, 2021. "Operation Optimization of Integrated Energy System under a Renewable Energy Dominated Future Scene Considering Both Independence and Benefit: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-36, February.
    20. Yang, Jie & Ma, Tieding & Ma, Kai & Yang, Bo & Guerrero, Josep M. & Liu, Zhixin, 2021. "Trading mechanism and pricing strategy of integrated energy systems based on credit rating and Bayesian game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3182-:d:1373478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.