IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1332-d1333533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What You Get Is What You See—The Mutual Relationships between Images of Human Nature and Business Model Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Hausdorf

    (Department of Socioeconomics, Hamburg University, 20148 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Despite considerable scholarly interest in the drivers of and barriers to business model innovation for sustainability transformations, scholars have not yet explored the role of images of human nature in this context. This is surprising because economic decisions are profoundly shaped by assumptions about humanity and its role in the world. Applying conceptual modelling as a methodological approach, this article sheds light on the mutual relationships between images of human nature and business model innovation. The main insights are twofold: First, images of human nature can be drivers of or barriers to business model innovation, as they enable or obstruct the adoption of new business models. Second, images of human nature can be challenged and adjusted through practical experiences with business models. The article concludes that images of human nature as representing an evolving holon have the greatest potential to push forward sustainability transformation by understanding humanity in a post-anthropocentric way and facilitating a profound reconsideration of business and economy. This study contributes to research on business model innovation by answering recent calls to advance theoretical perspectives on the factors that influence decision-making in innovation processes. It also helps research and practice to understand why certain business model innovations are preferred over others.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Hausdorf, 2024. "What You Get Is What You See—The Mutual Relationships between Images of Human Nature and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1332-:d:1333533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Turner & John Oyekan, 2023. "Manufacturing in the Age of Human-Centric and Sustainable Industry 5.0: Application to Holonic, Flexible, Reconfigurable and Smart Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    2. E. Schumacher & David Wasieleski, 2013. "Erratum to: Institutionalizing Ethical Innovation in Organizations: An Integrated Causal Model of Moral Innovation Decision Processes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 181-182, March.
    3. Tehreem Fatima & Kamal Badar & Muhammad Waqas & Arslan Ayub & Muhammad Haris, 2023. "CSR Communication Matters! An Examination of CSR, Organisational Pride, and Task-Related Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Stéphanie Arnaud & David Wasieleski, 2014. "Corporate Humanistic Responsibility: Social Performance Through Managerial Discretion of the HRM," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 313-334, March.
    5. Michael Pirson, 2019. "A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 39-57, September.
    6. Janet Sayers & Lydia Martin & Emma Bell, 2022. "Posthuman Affirmative Business Ethics: Reimagining Human–Animal Relations Through Speculative Fiction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 597-608, July.
    7. Ruttan, Rachel L. & Lucas, Brian J., 2018. "Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 47-58.
    8. Priyadarshini Das & Amer A. Hijazi & Duncan W. Maxwell & Robert C. Moehler, 2023. "Can Business Models Facilitate Strategic Transformation in Construction Firms? A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Julius Margolis, 1958. "The Analysis of the Firm: Rationalism, Conventionalism, and Behaviorism," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31, pages 187-187.
    10. E. Schumacher & David Wasieleski, 2013. "Institutionalizing Ethical Innovation in Organizations: An Integrated Causal Model of Moral Innovation Decision Processes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 15-37, March.
    11. Yi Liang & Chenyu Zhao & Min-Jae Lee, 2023. "Institutional Pressures on Sustainability and Green Performance: The Mediating Role of Digital Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Michael Pirson & Paul Lawrence, 2010. "Humanism in Business – Towards a Paradigm Shift?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 553-565, June.
    13. Paulina Kubera, 2023. "Behavioural Insights in Corporate Sustainability Research: A Review and Future Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Gloria Freschi & Marialuisa Menegatto & Adriano Zamperini, 2023. "How Can Psychology Contribute to Climate Change Governance? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Alma Acevedo, 2018. "A Personalistic Appraisal of Maslow’s Needs Theory of Motivation: From “Humanistic” Psychology to Integral Humanism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 741-763, April.
    16. Jyh-Shen Chiou & Lee-Yun Pan, 2008. "The Impact of Social Darwinism Perception, Status Anxiety, Perceived Trust of People, and Cultural Orientation on Consumer Ethical Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 487-502, April.
    17. Bloemmen, Marjolijn & Bobulescu, Roxana & Le, Nhu Tuyen & Vitari, Claudio, 2015. "Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 110-115.
    18. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    19. Claudia Groß & Dirk Vriens, 2019. "The Role of the Distributor Network in the Persistence of Legal and Ethical Problems of Multi-level Marketing Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 333-355, May.
    20. Guihuang Jiang & Xuehong Ji & Aonan Zhang, 2023. "Novelty and Sustainability: The Generation Process of Original Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Matheson & Pamala J. Dillon & Manuel Guillén & Clark Warner, 2021. "People Mattering at Work: A Humanistic Management Perspective," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 405-428, December.
    2. Domenec Melé, 2016. "Understanding Humanistic Management," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 33-55, September.
    3. Muel Kaptein, 2019. "The Moral Entrepreneur: A New Component of Ethical Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1135-1150, June.
    4. Elina Riivari & Anna-Maija Lämsä, 2019. "Organizational Ethical Virtues of Innovativeness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 223-240, March.
    5. Dmitry A. Ruban, 2022. "Analytical Review of Conjugation of the Ethical Bases of Artificial Intelligence Implementation and Ecologization in Corporate Governance," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 21(2), pages 390-418.
    6. Edwin Rühli & Sybille Sachs & Ruth Schmitt & Thomas Schneider, 2017. "Innovation in Multistakeholder Settings: The Case of a Wicked Issue in Health Care," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 289-305, June.
    7. Abigail B. Schneider & Daniel P. Justin, 2020. "Educating for an Inclusive Economy: Cultivating Relationality Through International Immersion," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 133-151, July.
    8. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Humanistic Orientation in Firm–Stakeholder Technology-based Interaction and Its Impact on Stakeholder Satisfaction," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 86-105, May.
    9. Keren Naa Abeka Arthur & Richard Owen, 2019. "A Micro-ethnographic Study of Big Data-Based Innovation in the Financial Services Sector: Governance, Ethics and Organisational Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 363-375, December.
    10. Sertan Kabadayi & Linda Alkire (née Nasr) & Garrett M. Broad & Reut Livne-Tarandach & David Wasieleski & Ann Marie Puente, 2019. "Humanistic Management of Social Innovation in Service (SIS): an Interdisciplinary Framework," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 159-185, December.
    11. Shandana Shoaib & Yehuda Baruch, 2019. "Deviant Behavior in a Moderated-Mediation Framework of Incentives, Organizational Justice Perception, and Reward Expectancy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 617-633, July.
    12. Abdullah Abdulaziz-Alhumaidan & Mohammad Jamal Khan, 2024. "The Effect of Ethical Strategy and Innovation on Economic Performance: a Study on Tunisian B2B Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2589-2606, March.
    13. Pamala J. Dillon, 2021. "Virtuous Social Responsiveness: Flourishing with Dignity," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 169-185, July.
    14. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt, 2018. "Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 241-259, January.
    15. Sokoli, Olta & Kapaj, Ilir & Doluschitz, Reiner, 2020. "Determining Factors that Affect Farming in the Albanian Milk Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(03), September.
    16. Cristina Mele & Tiziana Russo-Spena & Marco Tregua & Fabio Greco, 2019. "Communication practices in the diffusion of social-business innovation: Insights from B-Corporations," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(4), pages 11-27.
    17. Rob Lubberink & Vincent Blok & Johan Van Ophem & Onno Omta, 2017. "Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-31, May.
    18. Coralie Fiori-Khayat, 2023. "In Search of Regained Time? Autism and Organizational [A]temporality in the Light of Humanistic Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 665-679, December.
    19. Wade M. Chumney & David Wasieleski & E Günter Schumacher, 2017. "The conflict between U.S. patent protection and technological innovation," Post-Print hal-01768893, HAL.
    20. Peter W. Liesch & Catherine Welch, 2024. "Asynchronicities of growth: a process extension to the Uppsala model of internationalisation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(6), pages 796-804, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1332-:d:1333533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.