IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10169-d1180315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing in the Age of Human-Centric and Sustainable Industry 5.0: Application to Holonic, Flexible, Reconfigurable and Smart Manufacturing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Turner

    (Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • John Oyekan

    (Real Time and Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5GH, UK)

Abstract

This paper provides a classification of manufacturing types in terms of new technological tools provided in the Industry 5.0 framework. The manufacturing types agile, holonic, flexible and reconfigurable benefit from and are potentially changed by Industry 4.0 technologies and the human-centric focus of Industry 5.0. Furthermore, the use of Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) provides a holistic method for estimating the true value of emissions emitted during the carrying out of manufacturing decisions. As a result, LCA may be used as a central guiding framework, in addition to the use of Circular Economy metrics, for decisions in manufacturing whose results could be presented to humans as part of a scenario-generation system using visualisations within a Digital Twin environment. This enables a decision maker to make informed decisions regarding current and future production needs. Regardless of the size of production facility, this integrated approach is perhaps the most significant gap in research identified by this survey of manufacturing types and systems when viewed through the lens of Industry 5.0. This paper makes the contribution of providing an assessment of the major manufacturing types in the context of Industry 5.0, highlighting the gaps in the current research and providing a sustainable and human-centric agenda supported by LCA use with modern production methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Turner & John Oyekan, 2023. "Manufacturing in the Age of Human-Centric and Sustainable Industry 5.0: Application to Holonic, Flexible, Reconfigurable and Smart Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10169-:d:1180315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yusuf, Y. Y. & Sarhadi, M. & Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 33-43, May.
    2. Fabio Sgarbossa & Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane, 2020. "Cloud Material Handling Systems: Conceptual Model and Cloud-Based Scheduling of Handling Activities," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Boris Sokolov & Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui (ed.), Scheduling in Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing, chapter 0, pages 87-101, Springer.
    3. Ahmed R. Sadik & Bodo Urban, 2017. "An Ontology-Based Approach to Enable Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Worker–Cobot Agile Manufacturing," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, November.
    4. F. Tao & Y. Cheng & L. Zhang & A. Y. C. Nee, 2017. "Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1079-1094, June.
    5. Kumar, Naveen & Lee, Seul Chan, 2022. "Human-machine interface in smart factory: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Anupma Yadav & S.C. Jayswal, 2018. "Modelling of flexible manufacturing system: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 2464-2487, April.
    7. Elkins, Debra A. & Huang, Ningjian & Alden, Jeffrey M., 2004. "Agile manufacturing systems in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 201-214, October.
    8. Aurelio Montalto & Serena Graziosi & Monica Bordegoni & Luca Di Landro & Michael Johannes Leonardus Tooren, 2020. "An approach to design reconfigurable manufacturing tools to manage product variability: the mass customisation of eyewear," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 87-102, January.
    9. Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 87-105, May.
    10. Harshwardhan Ketkale & Steven Simske, 2023. "A LifeCycle Analysis and Economic Cost Analysis of Corrugated Cardboard Box Reuse and Recycling in the United States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janine Mügge & Anne Seegrün & Tessa-Katharina Hoyer & Theresa Riedelsheimer & Kai Lindow, 2024. "Digital Twins within the Circular Economy: Literature Review and Concept Presentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Alexandra Nicoleta Ciucu-Durnoi & Camelia Delcea & Aurelia Stănescu & Cosmin Alexandru Teodorescu & Vanesa Mădălina Vargas, 2024. "Beyond Industry 4.0: Tracing the Path to Industry 5.0 through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Michaela Hausdorf, 2024. "What You Get Is What You See—The Mutual Relationships between Images of Human Nature and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2008. "Product variety arising from hedging in the fashion supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 431-455, August.
    2. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Effect of Organizational Agility on Quality of Work Life: A Study on Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 271-271, May.
    3. Madhukar Patil & M. Suresh, 2019. "Modelling the Enablers of Workforce Agility in IoT Projects: A TISM Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(2), pages 157-175, June.
    4. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Dowlatshahi, Shad & Cao, Qing, 2006. "The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: An industry perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 835-860, October.
    7. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    8. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    9. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    10. Guo, Daqiang & Li, Mingxing & Lyu, Zhongyuan & Kang, Kai & Wu, Wei & Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q., 2021. "Synchroperation in industry 4.0 manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    11. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    12. Ganguly, Anirban & Nilchiani, Roshanak & Farr, John V., 2009. "Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 410-423, April.
    13. Ranjbarfard, Mina & Mirsalari, Reyhaneh, 2017. "بررسی چابکی سازمانی و شناسایی شاخص‌های ارزیابی آن در سازمان [Investigating organizational agility and identifying its evaluation indicators in the organization]," MPRA Paper 114738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Rima Zitkiene & Mindaugas Deksnys, 2018. "Organizational Agility Conceptual Model," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(2), pages 115-129.
    15. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 296-296, April.
    16. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2017. "Job Engagement as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Agility and Organizational Performance: A Study on Teaching Hospitals in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 223-240, October.
    17. Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo & Sepideh Saghafi, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of Using Knowledge Management on Organisational Agility through Competitive Intelligence and Strategic Thinking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-31, June.
    18. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    19. Gosling, J. & Purvis, L. & Naim, M.M., 2010. "Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 11-21, November.
    20. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Improve Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 97-111, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10169-:d:1180315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.