IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p755-d1319857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Rustam Shadiev

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310014, China)

  • Wayan Sintawati

    (School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Nurassyl Kerimbayev

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Fahriye Altinay

    (Societal Research and Development Center, Faculty of Education, Institute of Graduate Studies, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, Turkey)

Abstract

Technology-supported cross-cultural learning (TSCCL) is essential for effective intercultural communication, fostering global understanding, and facilitating collaboration in an interconnected world. Although previous studies and review articles have explored this field, a comprehensive analysis of trends and key findings in these reviews is lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a thorough examination of existing review studies. We employed a narrative synthesis approach consisting of three phases: preparation, organization, and abstraction. We selected and systematically reviewed thirty-one review articles published in twenty-five journals between 2003 and 2023. Our findings highlight key aspects of the reviewed articles, such as keywords, databases, selection criteria, theoretical foundations, content analysis, research questions, findings, and limitations related to technology-supported cross-cultural learning. We found that the researchers used various strategies for literature searches, including single, double, or multiple keywords depending on the study’s focus. The most commonly used keywords were telecollaboration, intercultural, communication, competence, language learning, and technology, indicating their significance in current research and practice. The number of papers reviewed varied across studies, as did the timeframe coverage, ranging from a few years to several decades. Researchers employed different databases, with Web of Science, ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar being the most popular choices. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to ensure methodological rigor and relevance. Theoretical foundations, such as the telecollaboration model and intercultural communicative competence model, were frequently employed. Open coding was the dominant content analysis approach used. Research questions were present in some studies but not explicitly stated in others. These findings shed light on the strategies and considerations used by researchers in conducting review studies on technology-supported cross-cultural learning, providing guidance for future research. The study presents a reference table encompassing all previously published reviews, which can be valuable for future scholars. By gaining insights from past studies and identifying unexplored research avenues, researchers can benefit from this report. Additionally, the implications and suggestions derived from this review study are valuable for educators and researchers in the TSCCL field. This review addresses gaps in the existing literature and contributes to advancing knowledge in the field of TSCCL.

Suggested Citation

  • Rustam Shadiev & Wayan Sintawati & Nurassyl Kerimbayev & Fahriye Altinay, 2024. "Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-36, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:755-:d:1319857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu-Yuin Hwang & Rio Nurtantyana, 2022. "X-Education: Education of All Things with AI and Edge Computing—One Case Study for EFL Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Aras Bozkurt & Abdulkadir Karadeniz & David Baneres & Ana Elena Guerrero-Roldán & M. Elena Rodríguez, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Reflections from Educational Landscape: A Review of AI Studies in Half a Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Qinxu Jiang & Shimin Soon & Yuandong Li, 2021. "Enhancing Teachers’ Intercultural Competence with Online Technology as Cognitive Tools: A Literature Review," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wala Bagunaid & Naveen Chilamkurti & Ahmad Salehi Shahraki & Saeed Bamashmos, 2024. "Visual Data and Pattern Analysis for Smart Education: A Robust DRL-Based Early Warning System for Student Performance Prediction," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Gizéh Rangel-de Lázaro & Josep M. Duart, 2023. "You Can Handle, You Can Teach It: Systematic Review on the Use of Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Online Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Rustam Shadiev & Barry Lee Reynolds & Rui Li, 2024. "The Use of Digital Technology for Sustainable Teaching and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-4, June.
    4. Dawool Jung & Sungeun Suh, 2024. "Enhancing Soft Skills through Generative AI in Sustainable Fashion Textile Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Daina Gudoniene & Evelina Staneviciene & Vytautas Buksnaitis & Nicola Daley, 2023. "The Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence and Wireframes Implementation in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Jennie C. De Gagne, 2023. "The State of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Past, Present, and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-4, March.
    7. Shubashini Rathina Velu, 2022. "Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Aleksandra Klašnja-Milićević & Mirjana Ivanović, 2021. "E-learning Personalization Systems and Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-6, June.
    9. Ajda Fošner, 2024. "University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards AI Tools: Implications for Sustainable Educational Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Sunghwan Hwang, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Elementary Students’ Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Florin-Valeriu Pantelimon & Razvan Bologa & Andrei Toma & Bogdan-Stefan Posedaru, 2021. "The Evolution of AI-Driven Educational Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Chih-Chang Yu & Yufeng (Leon) Wu, 2021. "Early Warning System for Online STEM Learning—A Slimmer Approach Using Recurrent Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Valentin Kuleto & Simona Corina Dobre Gudei & Costin Lianu & Cosmin Lianu & Milena P. Ilić & Dan Păun, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence Potential in Higher Education Institutions Enhanced Learning Environment in Romania and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Vikrant Vikram Singh & Nishant Kumar & Shailender Singh & Meenakshi Kaul & Aditya Kumar Gupta & P. K. Kapur, 2024. "Assessment of artificial intelligence-based digital learning systems in higher education amid the pandemic using analytic hierarchy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 4069-4084, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:755-:d:1319857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.