IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p24-d1008888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Shubashini Rathina Velu

    (MIS Department, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Khobar 34754, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Introduction: The spread of the COVID-19 virus and the supremacy of digital technologies have amplified global market volatility in all industries. This circumstance will have a lasting impact on students’ employability, so the education sector, particularly universities, should refocus its learning objectives. Design thinking (DT) is a collaborative and resourceful approach to problem-solving in which the demands of end-users and content creators take precedence. Objectives: In this study, the author seeks to comprehend how design thinking procedures in higher learning institutions inspire innovative behavior among undergraduate students. In light of the extensive literature regarding the adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in terms of innovative actions, this study integrates two theoretical foundations (i.e., activity theory to mediate the nature of human activity and how its internalization affects mental development) and constructive learning theory to enhance students’ innovative action. Methods: The data for this quantitative investigation were acquired using an online survey. A total of 300 questionnaires were delivered to undergraduate university students in the eastern part of Saudi Arabia, of whom 208 responded. SmartPLS was utilized to analyze the data. The methodology proposed in this study aims to cultivate in university undergraduate students the sensibility and techniques of designers that are compatible with technological feasible innovative action. Results: This study addresses technology-assisted education in the context of Saudi Arabia. Students’ innovative learning experiences are characterized by autonomy and are supported by design thinking processes mediated by information and communication technology (ICT). On the basis of the findings of this study, the role of empathy and prototype in the DT process appears to be crucial to innovativeness, whereas the roles of define and ideate are detrimental to innovativeness. It has also been determined that ICT indirectly promotes innovative student behavior. Conclusions: Students valued the incorporation of design thinking and ICT in the creation of inventive action to foster creativity in problem-solving skills throughout the digital acceleration. To evaluate the transferability of these findings, future study might be undertaken in other education sectors, such as schools, vocational institutes, and the industry itself. In addition, future data should be analyzed through in-depth interviews or root cause analysis from the perspective of educators and instructional designers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shubashini Rathina Velu, 2022. "Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:24-:d:1008888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/24/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/24/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer, 2012. "Design Thinking Research," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 1-11, Springer.
    2. Colm M P O’Tuathaigh & Alia Nadhirah Idris & Eileen Duggan & Patricio Costa & Manuel João Costa, 2019. "Medical students’ empathy and attitudes towards professionalism: Relationship with personality, specialty preference and medical programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Wu-Yuin Hwang & Rio Nurtantyana, 2022. "X-Education: Education of All Things with AI and Edge Computing—One Case Study for EFL Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Tazim Jamal & Julie Kircher & Jonan Phillip Donaldson, 2021. "Re-Visiting Design Thinking for Learning and Practice: Critical Pedagogy, Conative Empathy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Xue Gong & Zhuen Guo & Zhongqu Xie, 2022. "Using Kansei Engineering for the Design Thinking Framework: Bamboo Pen Holder Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. David Méndez & Miriam Méndez & Juana María Anguita, 2022. "Digital Teaching Competence in Teacher Training as an Element to Attain SDG 4 of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Christine Noweski & Andrea Scheer & Nadja Büttner & Julia Thienen & Johannes Erdmann & Christoph Meinel, 2012. "Towards a Paradigm Shift in Education Practice: Developing Twenty-First Century Skills with Design Thinking," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 71-94, Springer.
    8. Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer, 2012. "Design Thinking Research," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 1-10, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jih-Sheng Lo & Chi-Hung Lo & Shyh-Chour Huang & Wei-Chen Wang, 2019. "Application of User Experience and Design Thinking to the Construction of a Class Assistance System for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Ahmet Cengiz Ucar & Lutfihak Alpkan & Meral Elci, 2021. "The Effects of Person–Organization Fit and Turnover Intention on Employees’ Creative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    3. Mathias Lanezki & Catharina Siemer & Steffen Wehkamp, 2020. "“Changing the Game—Neighbourhood”: An Energy Transition Board Game, Developed in a Co-Design Process: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Julia Wells Novy & Banny Banerjee & Pamela Matson, 2021. "A Core Curriculum for Sustainability Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Kuan-Yi Wu, 2018. "Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Laura Huang & Cristina B Gibson & Bradley L Kirkman & Debra L Shapiro, 2017. "When is traditionalism an asset and when is it a liability for team innovation? A two-study empirical examination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(6), pages 693-715, August.
    7. Renee Newman-Storen, 2014. "Leadership in Sustainability: Creating an Interface between Creativity and Leadership Theory in Dealing with “Wicked Problems”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Samir Patel & Khanjan Mehta, 2017. "Systems, Design, and Entrepreneurial Thinking: Comparative Frameworks," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 515-533, October.
    9. Rustam Shadiev & Barry Lee Reynolds & Rui Li, 2024. "The Use of Digital Technology for Sustainable Teaching and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-4, June.
    10. Shu-Chen Cheng & Yu-Ping Cheng & Yueh-Min Huang, 2023. "Developing a Learning Pathway System through Web-Based Mining Technology to Explore Students’ Learning Motivation and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, 2021. "Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Students Using Design Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Nicoleta Suciu & Lorena Elena Meliț & Cristina Oana Mărginean, 2021. "A Holistic Approach of Personality Traits in Medical Students: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Qingru Duan & Yong Jiang & Yifang Wang & Chuchu Zheng & Jing Liu & Xin Liu, 2023. "Development and Validation of Chinese Kindergarten Teachers’ Learning and Development Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Stanislav Avsec & Vesna Ferk Savec, 2021. "Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of, and Experiences with, Technology-Enhanced Transformative Learning towards Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Rustam Shadiev & Wayan Sintawati & Nurassyl Kerimbayev & Fahriye Altinay, 2024. "Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-36, January.
    16. Baoyi Zhang & Zongsheng Wang & Zhe Li, 2024. "Mobility Aid Design for the Elderly (MADE): a design thinking approach using a smart walker as a case study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Meichen Liu & Jinquan Cai & Hao Chen & Lei Shi, 2022. "Association of Personality Traits with Life and Work of Medical Students: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:24-:d:1008888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.