IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8668-d1493895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards AI Tools: Implications for Sustainable Educational Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Ajda Fošner

    (Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Izolska vrata 2, 6000 Koper, Slovenia)

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in educational settings offers significant opportunities to promote sustainability by transforming learning experiences. This study analyses the usage, attitudes, and perceptions of AI tools among university students in Slovenia providing a comprehensive analysis that informs both academic practices and policy-making with emphasis on sustainability. We used a structured questionnaire with a sample of 422 participants reflecting a diverse demographic profile across various fields of study. The questionnaire was designed to measure the frequency of AI tool usage, the purposes for which these tools are employed, and students’ attitudes and perceptions towards AI’s potential benefits and drawbacks in education. Statistical analyses, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), were utilized to test hypotheses concerning differences in AI tool usage based on the level and field of study. Findings reveal that students recognize the efficiency of AI, but express concerns about its impact on learning quality and academic integrity, emphasizing the need for a balanced and responsible integration of AI in education to achieve sustainable outcomes. Results indicated that a majority of students are engaging with AI tools, with varied frequencies of use largely dependent on their field of study and academic level. The findings suggest that while AI tools are becoming an integral part of the educational landscape in Slovenia, there is a critical need to address the educational, ethical, and psychological impacts of these technologies. The results highlight the necessity for further research into the educational implications of AI, suggesting a balanced and sustainable approach to integrating these technologies into higher education curricula. Such an approach ensures that the adoption of AI not only enhances learning outcomes but also aligns with the principles of sustainability, promoting long-term benefits for both education and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajda Fošner, 2024. "University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards AI Tools: Implications for Sustainable Educational Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8668-:d:1493895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8668/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8668/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chokri Kooli, 2023. "Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Aras Bozkurt & Abdulkadir Karadeniz & David Baneres & Ana Elena Guerrero-Roldán & M. Elena Rodríguez, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Reflections from Educational Landscape: A Review of AI Studies in Half a Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wala Bagunaid & Naveen Chilamkurti & Ahmad Salehi Shahraki & Saeed Bamashmos, 2024. "Visual Data and Pattern Analysis for Smart Education: A Robust DRL-Based Early Warning System for Student Performance Prediction," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Gizéh Rangel-de Lázaro & Josep M. Duart, 2023. "You Can Handle, You Can Teach It: Systematic Review on the Use of Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Online Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Dawool Jung & Sungeun Suh, 2024. "Enhancing Soft Skills through Generative AI in Sustainable Fashion Textile Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Daina Gudoniene & Evelina Staneviciene & Vytautas Buksnaitis & Nicola Daley, 2023. "The Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence and Wireframes Implementation in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Stefan Voß, 2023. "Bus Bunching and Bus Bridging: What Can We Learn from Generative AI Tools like ChatGPT?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Jennie C. De Gagne, 2023. "The State of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Past, Present, and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-4, March.
    7. Aleksandra Klašnja-Milićević & Mirjana Ivanović, 2021. "E-learning Personalization Systems and Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-6, June.
    8. Pethigmage Perera & Madushan Lankathilaka, 2023. "AI in Higher Education: A Literature Review of ChatGPT and Guidelines for Responsible Implementation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 306-314, June.
    9. Marian Oliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Kacper Sieciński, 2024. "Bibliometric Overview of ChatGPT: New Perspectives in Social Sciences," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Poleac Dalia, 2024. "Design Thinking with AI," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2891-2900.
    11. Sunghwan Hwang, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Elementary Students’ Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Florin-Valeriu Pantelimon & Razvan Bologa & Andrei Toma & Bogdan-Stefan Posedaru, 2021. "The Evolution of AI-Driven Educational Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Zied Bahroun & Chiraz Anane & Vian Ahmed & Andrew Zacca, 2023. "Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-40, August.
    14. Maria Karyotaki & Athanasios Drigas & Charalabos Skianis, 2024. "Contributions of the 9-Layered Model of Giftedness to the Development of a Conversational Agent for Healthy Ageing and Sustainable Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Niu, Ben & Mvondo, Gustave Florentin Nkoulou, 2024. "I Am ChatGPT, the ultimate AI Chatbot! Investigating the determinants of users' loyalty and ethical usage concerns of ChatGPT," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Eugène Loos & Johanna Gröpler & Marie-Louise Sophie Goudeau, 2023. "Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT’s Self-Reflection," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Chih-Chang Yu & Yufeng (Leon) Wu, 2021. "Early Warning System for Online STEM Learning—A Slimmer Approach Using Recurrent Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Valentin Kuleto & Simona Corina Dobre Gudei & Costin Lianu & Cosmin Lianu & Milena P. Ilić & Dan Păun, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence Potential in Higher Education Institutions Enhanced Learning Environment in Romania and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Serap Kalfaoğlu, 2023. "Social Sustainability Indicators from Employees’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study on Whether Social Sustainability in Businesses Is Perceived as a Necessity, Preference, or Dream," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Rustam Shadiev & Wayan Sintawati & Nurassyl Kerimbayev & Fahriye Altinay, 2024. "Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-36, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8668-:d:1493895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.