IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11059-d1545638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Chinese Farmers’ Behavioral Intentions to Use Alternative Fuel Machinery: Insights from the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Shoufeng Wu

    (School of Accounting, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, No. 166 Sanhua Road, Leping Town, Sanshui District, Foshan 528138, China)

  • Yuewen Xiao

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China)

  • Anca Pacala

    (Department of Automated Systems Engineering and Management, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Alina Badulescu

    (Department of Economics and Business, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Salman Khan

    (Research Institute of Business Analytics and Supply Chain Management, College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and reducing fossil fuel dependence have heightened interest in alternative fuels, particularly in agriculture, a key energy-intensive sector. This study investigates the use of the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior to analyze Chinese farmers’ behavioral intentions to adopt alternative fuel machinery. In 2023, a total of 281 full-time farmers were sampled from Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Hebei provinces, followed by path analysis conducted using PLS-SEM. The results underline that perceived usefulness β = 0.369, p < 0.001, and social norms β = 0.185, p < 0.001 are strong drivers for the adoption of alternative fuel machinery, while perceived barriers to operate and infrastructure gaps act as inhibitors. Also, perceived benefits β = 0.235, p = 0.002, and perceived behavior control β = 0.157, p = 0.027 positively predict behavior intentions. This thus suggests that improvement in the technological infrastructure and increasing farmers’ awareness of the practical and economic benefits of alternative fuel machinery could result in a serious increase in adoption rates. This study does have weaknesses, as its focus on 50 mid-sized farms in the Midwest and utilization of self-reported data may limit the generalizability of its findings. This study, however, has major implications for policy and manufacturers to underscore the fact that targeted interventions through subsidies, training programs, and infrastructural development would be necessary to permit a transition toward sustainable energy in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoufeng Wu & Yuewen Xiao & Anca Pacala & Alina Badulescu & Salman Khan, 2024. "Understanding Chinese Farmers’ Behavioral Intentions to Use Alternative Fuel Machinery: Insights from the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11059-:d:1545638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giancarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan & Andrei Sobolevsky, 2000. "Roundup ready® soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 33-55.
    2. Takase, Mohammed & Zhao, Ting & Zhang, Min & Chen, Yao & Liu, Hongyang & Yang, Liuqing & Wu, Xiangyang, 2015. "An expatiate review of neem, jatropha, rubber and karanja as multipurpose non-edible biodiesel resources and comparison of their fuel, engine and emission properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 495-520.
    3. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    4. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    5. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Zhang, Zhixin, 2022. "Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Zeller, Manfred & Diagne, Aliou & Mataya, Charles, 1998. "Market access by smallholder farmers in Malawi: implications for technology adoption, agricultural productivity and crop income," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 219-229, September.
    7. Zeng, Shihong & Tanveer, Arifa & Fu, Xiaolan & Gu, Yuxiao & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "Modeling the influence of critical factors on the adoption of green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Céline Nauges, 2020. "Uncertainty, Learning, and Technology Adoption in Agriculture," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 42-53, March.
    9. Omulo, Godfrey & Daum, Thomas & Köller, Karlheinz & Birner, Regina, 2024. "Unpacking the behavioral intentions of ‘emergent farmers’ towards mechanized conservation agriculture in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Douglas L. Bessette & Daniel C. Brainard & Ajit K. Srivastava & Woongkul Lee & Sarah Geurkink, 2022. "Battery Electric Tractors: Small-Scale Organic Growers’ Preferences, Perceptions, and Concerns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Wong, Gai-Zhe & Wong, Kok-Hoe & Lau, Teck-Chai & Lee, Jun-Han & Kok, Yin-Hui, 2024. "Study of intention to use renewable energy technology in Malaysia using TAM and TPB," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Manfred Zeller & Aliou Diagne & Charles Mataya, 1998. "Market access by smallholder farmers in Malawi: implications for technology adoption, agricultural productivity and crop income," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(1-2), pages 219-229, September.
    14. Su, Fang & Chang, Jiangbo & Li, Xi & Fahad, Shah & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2023. "Assessment of diverse energy consumption structure and social capital: A case of southern Shaanxi province China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    15. Tanvi Bhatia & Gnana Bharathy & Mukesh Prasad, 2024. "A Targeted Review on Revisiting and Augmenting the Framework for Technology Acceptance in the Renewable Energy Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth, Akankwasa & Gerald, Ortmann & Edilegnaw, Wale & Wilberforce, Tushemereirwe, 2012. "Ex-Ante Adoption of New Cooking Banana (Matooke) Hybrids in Uganda Based on Farmers' Perceptions," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 123302, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Nakano, Yuko & Magezi, Eustadius F., 2020. "The impact of microcredit on agricultural technology adoption and productivity: Evidence from randomized control trial in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    4. Suhao Wei & Yangxiao Lu, 2022. "Why China’s AMS Market Is Difficult to Develop Sustainably: Evidence from the North China Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Simtowe, Franklin & Zeller, Manfred, 2006. "The Impact of Access to Credit on the Adoption of hybrid maize in Malawi: An Empirical test of an Agricultural Household Model under credit market failure," MPRA Paper 45, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Franklin Simtowe & Manfred Zeller & Aliou Diagne, 2009. "The impact of credit constraints on the adoption of hybrid maize in Malawi," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 90(1), pages 5-22.
    7. Satadru Mukherjee, 2020. "Access to Formal Banks and New Technology Adoption: Evidence from India," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1532-1556, October.
    8. S?ren Marcus Pedersen & Kim Martin Lind & Orjon Xhoxhi & Attila Yazar & Sven-Erik Jacobsen & Jens Erik ?rum, 2020. "Introducing quinoa in Turkey - farmers perception in the region of Adana," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24.
    9. Beke, Tite Ehuitché, 2011. "Institutional constraints and adoption of improved rice varieties: Econometric evidence from Ivory Coast," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(2).
    10. Perosa, Bruno & Newton, Peter & Carrer, Marcelo José, 2021. "Access to information affects the adoption of integrated systems by farmers in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    11. Zeller, Manfred, 1999. "Towards Enhancing the Role of Microfinance for Safety Nets of the Poor," Discussion Papers 280263, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    12. Akinola, Adebayo A. & Arega, D.A. & Adeyemo, Remi & Sanogo, Diakalia & Olanrewaju, Adetunji S. & Nwoke, C. & Nzigaheba, G. & Diels, J., 2008. "Determinants of adoption and intensity of use of balanced nutrient management systems technologies in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria," 2007 Second International Conference, August 20-22, 2007, Accra, Ghana 52007, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    13. Tite Ehuitché Beke, 2011. "Institutional constraints and adoption of improved rice varieties: Econometric evidence from Ivory Coast," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(2), pages 117-141.
    14. Matuschke, Ira & Mishra, Ritesh R. & Qaim, Matin, 2007. "Adoption and Impact of Hybrid Wheat in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1422-1435, August.
    15. Tothova, Monika & Meyers, William H., 2006. "Modelling the Acceptance of High Beta-carotene Maize," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21457, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Pingan Xiang & Jian Guo, 2023. "Understanding Farmers’ Intentions to Adopt Pest and Disease Green Control Techniques: Comparison and Integration Based on Multiple Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Akinola, Adebayo A. & Alene, Arega D. & Adeyemo, Remi & Sanogo, D. & Olanrewaju, A.S. & Nwoke, C. & Nziguheba, G., 2010. "Determinants of adoption and intensity of use of balance nutrient management systems technologies in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 49(01), pages 1-21.
    18. Kidane Mariam Gebregziabher, 2014. "Agricultural Extension Service and Input Application Intensity: Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(9), pages 735-747.
    19. Reimer, Jeffrey & Fisher, Monica, 2014. "Are modern varieties always better? An economic analysis of maize varietal selection," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Lambrecht, Isabel & Vanlauwe, Bernard & Merckx, Roel & Maertens, Miet, 2014. "Understanding the Process of Agricultural Technology Adoption: Mineral Fertilizer in Eastern DR Congo," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 132-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11059-:d:1545638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.