IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10862-d1541674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Urban Planning for Social Sustainability: A Combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, with Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats Analysis, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (A’WOT-TOPSIS)

Author

Listed:
  • Ayse Akbulut Basar

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde 51240, Turkey)

Abstract

This study explores the role of participation in achieving social sustainability in urban environments. As uncertainties about the future grow, the need for methods that ensure the representation of diverse stakeholders becomes essential. The Participatory A’WOT-TOPSIS Method is introduced as an effective approach for managing multi-actor and multi-decision-making processes. This Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method combines SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). An empirical application was conducted to assess various urban scenarios through a strategic planning process involving five distinct stakeholder groups. Using an inductive approach, one of three scenarios was selected. Findings demonstrate that the proposed method enhances transparency, ensures objectivity, reduces inconsistencies in stakeholder decision-making, and promotes collaborative representation. However, increasing the number of decision-makers and decisions may lead to greater workload and time demands for those implementing the method. This approach lays the groundwork for future research incorporating elements like representation, belonging, and identity into participatory processes to foster social sustainability in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayse Akbulut Basar, 2024. "Participatory Urban Planning for Social Sustainability: A Combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, with Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats Analysis, and the Technique for Order Prefer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10862-:d:1541674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10862-:d:1541674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.