IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10821-d1540717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneities in Farmers’ Preference for Advisory Services: A Choice Experiment of Vegetable Growers in North-Western Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Ermias Tesfaye Teferi

    (International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5689, Ethiopia
    Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Blue Nile Water Institute, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 79, Ethiopia)

  • Tigist Damtew Worku

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Food and Climate Science, Injibara University, Injibara P.O. Box 40, Ethiopia)

  • Solomon Bizuayehu Wassie

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Blue Nile Water Institute, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 79, Ethiopia)

  • Bernd Muller

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Nutrition, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Abdul-Rahim Abdulai

    (International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali 6713, Colombia)

  • Céline Termote

    (The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi P.O. Box 823-00621, Kenya)

Abstract

This study investigated vegetable farmers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for private agricultural advisory services in northwestern Ethiopia. Understanding farmers’ preferences is a crucial step for modernizing agricultural advisory services and transforming smallholder agri-food systems into a sustainable path. Discrete choice experiment data from 393 farm households were analyzed using a random parameter logit model (RPL). The results revealed that vegetable farmers are willing to pay for practice-oriented private advisory services. The result also showed the existence of heterogeneity in farmers’ preference for features of vegetable advisory services. Household heads’ educational status and age influenced preferences for advisory service features. The result is substantiated by the fact that merely 25.5% of the sample households acquired formal education. Farmers in general preferred extension services with frequent expert visits and practical engagement on-farm as opposed to digitized options that rely on short message service (SMS) and voice-based guidance. Additionally, farmers are willing to pay an ETB 120.89 and ETB 203.94 monthly fee for an extension service that emphasizes fruity and root and tuber vegetables, respectively, as opposed to leafy vegetables. The findings imply initiatives that push for commercializing agricultural advisory services should strive to achieve a balance between the practical application and digitization of extension services accounting for the heterogeneous preferences of smallholder farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ermias Tesfaye Teferi & Tigist Damtew Worku & Solomon Bizuayehu Wassie & Bernd Muller & Abdul-Rahim Abdulai & Céline Termote, 2024. "Heterogeneities in Farmers’ Preference for Advisory Services: A Choice Experiment of Vegetable Growers in North-Western Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10821-:d:1540717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10821-:d:1540717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.