IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9773-d1517224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring How to Optimise Transformative Pro-Environmental Behaviour Changes via Nudging on Shared Values Crystallisation

Author

Listed:
  • Rahel N. Tening

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 2205 Songhu Rd., Shanghai 200438, China)

  • Chike C. Ebido

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 2205 Songhu Rd., Shanghai 200438, China
    Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 410001, Nigeria)

  • Marie K. Harder

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 2205 Songhu Rd., Shanghai 200438, China
    Values & Sustainability Research Group, School of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 0JY, UK)

Abstract

Transformative learning processes that can trigger deep and long-lasting behaviour changes are highly sought after for targeted improvements ranging from human diet and health to pro-environmental behaviours. A step forward was the reporting of a method that reliably produces transformative learning outcomes (TLOs) as an (incidental) effect of group shared values crystallisation, but the theme of the TLOs could not be targeted, e.g., for pro-environmental behaviours. A recent exploratory study bolted on environmentally themed pre-Nudging and unexpectedly produced a heavy bias towards pro-environmental behaviour changes. Here, we investigated more systematically the influences of different Nudging types upon TLO themes produced using two further case study designs created for comparability with earlier studies and using the same process ( WeValue InSitu ) and post-event data collection of TLOs categorised as environmental/not and behavioural/not. Our findings show that most Nudging had no effect, including raising the profile of environmental photos and the materials used in the crystallisation process, having participants reflect on their environmental identities, or emphasising environmental topics before going home. However, Nudging which involved answering written questions on specific personal pro-environmental actions such as recycling, applied early on, was linked to desired results. This has pragmatic significance for sustainability practitioners and raises questions for further research on the mechanisms of both active learning and Nudging.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahel N. Tening & Chike C. Ebido & Marie K. Harder, 2024. "Exploring How to Optimise Transformative Pro-Environmental Behaviour Changes via Nudging on Shared Values Crystallisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9773-:d:1517224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9773/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9773/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gemma Burford & Elona Hoover & Lee Stapleton & Marie K. Harder, 2016. "An Unexpected Means of Embedding Ethics in Organizations: Preliminary Findings from Values-Based Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Damgaard, Mette Trier & Nielsen, Helena Skyt, 2018. "Nudging in education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 313-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas A. Wright & Puneet Arora & Jesse Wright, 2024. "I Promise to Work Hard: The Impact of a Non-Binding Commitment Pledge on Academic Performance," Working Papers 2411, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    2. Ballestar, María Teresa & Mir, Miguel Cuerdo & Pedrera, Luis Miguel Doncel & Sainz, Jorge, 2024. "Effectiveness of tutoring at school: A machine learning evaluation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Shumon Zihady, 2023. "Dupchanchia Model of Students' drop-out control through engagement and appreciation after Covid-19: A Behavioral Policy intervention in the field administration of Bangladesh," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 136-148, May.
    4. Sesha Kethineni & Susan Frazier‐Kouassi & Yuki Shigemoto & Wesley Jennings & Stephanie M. Cardwell & Alex R. Piquero & Kimberly Gay & Dayanand Sundaravadivelu, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of parent‐engagement programs to reduce truancy and juvenile delinquency: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    5. Henning Hermes & Philipp Lergetporer & Frauke Peter & Simon Wiederhold, 2021. "Application Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment," CESifo Working Paper Series 9282, CESifo.
    6. Sofia Badini & Esther Gehrke & Friederike Lenel & Claudia Schupp, 2024. "Expanding Horizons A Randomized Controlled Trial on Adolescents’ Career Information Acquisition," CESifo Working Paper Series 11225, CESifo.
    7. repec:fip:fedpwp:97987 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lars Behlen & Oliver Himmler & Robert Jäckle, 2023. "Defaults and effortful tasks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1022-1059, November.
    9. Burgess, Simon & Metcalfe, Robert & Sadoff, Sally, 2021. "Understanding the response to financial and non-financial incentives in education: Field experimental evidence using high-stakes assessments," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Papineau, Maya & Rivers, Nicholas, 2022. "Experimental evidence on heat loss visualization and personalized information to motivate energy savings," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Lisa van der Sande & Ilona Wildeman & Adriana G. Bus & Roel van Steensel, 2023. "Nudging to Stimulate Reading in Primary and Secondary Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    12. Diane Pelly & Orla Doyle, 2022. "Nudging in the workplace: increasing participation in employee EDI wellness events," Working Papers 202208, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    13. Cattaneo, Maria A. & Wolter, Stefan C., 2022. "“Against all odds” Does awareness of the risk of failure matter for educational choices?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Andor, Mark A. & Fels, Katja M. & Renz, Jan & Rzepka, Sylvi, 2018. "Do planning prompts increase educational success? Evidence from randomized controlled trials in MOOCs," Ruhr Economic Papers 790, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Gordanier, John & Hauk, William & Sankaran, Chandini, 2019. "Early intervention in college classes and improved student outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 23-29.
    16. Martínez, Cecilia & Skeet, Ann Gregg & Sasia, Pedro M., 2021. "Managing organizational ethics: How ethics becomes pervasive within organizations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 83-92.
    17. Xiaoyan Chen & Wei Geng, 2022. "Enroll now, pay later: optimal pricing and nudge efforts for massive-online-open-courses providers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 1003-1018, June.
    18. Mistree, Dinsha & Loyalka, Prashant & Fairlie, Robert & Bhuradia, Ashutosh & Angrish, Manyu & Lin, Jason & Karoshi, Amar & Yen, Sara J. & Mistri, Jamsheed & Bayat, Vafa, 2021. "Instructional interventions for improving COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, behaviors: Evidence from a large-scale RCT in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Peter, Frauke & Wiederhold, Simon, 2021. "Behavioral Barriers and the Socioeconomic Gap in Child Care Enrollment," IZA Discussion Papers 14698, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Peter, Frauke & Spiess, C. Katharina & Zambre, Vaishali, 2021. "Informing students about college: Increasing enrollment using a behavioral intervention?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 524-549.
    21. Cheng Yuan & Xiaoxiao Wang & Li Lin, 2023. "Why Do Financially Illiterate Students Perceive Lower Education Returns? Evidence From a Survey in Rural China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9773-:d:1517224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.