IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10035-d1523152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Conventional to Organic Agriculture: Influencing Factors and Reasons for Tea Farmers’ Adoption of Organic Farming in Pu’er City

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Li

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China
    Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shuqi Yang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China)

  • Juping Yan

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China)

  • Wangsheng Gao

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China)

  • Jixiao Cui

    (Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yuanquan Chen

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China)

Abstract

As the global pursuit of sustainable agricultural practices continues, organic farming is gaining increasing attention. In Pu’er, one of China’s major tea-producing regions, the factors influencing tea farmers’ willingness to adopt organic agriculture have not yet been fully studied. This study integrates the diffusion of innovations theory and the theory of planned behavior, using field surveys to thoroughly analyze the key factors and reasons affecting tea farmers in Pu’er in adopting organic farming practices. The findings indicate that perceptions of the economic benefits of organic farming are the primary drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt. Experience with organic agriculture training and positive views on environmental and health benefits also significantly enhance the willingness to adopt organic farming. Contrary to common assumptions, education level, age, and household income have minimal influence on adoption willingness. However, low-income families that rely on tea cultivation are more inclined to adopt organic farming. Policymakers should prioritize economic incentives, strengthen training support, and enhance the promotion of the benefits of organic agriculture, while simplifying certification processes and expanding market channels to facilitate the transition of tea farmers to organic agriculture. This study offers insights into the sustainable tea industry and organic farming promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Li & Shuqi Yang & Juping Yan & Wangsheng Gao & Jixiao Cui & Yuanquan Chen, 2024. "From Conventional to Organic Agriculture: Influencing Factors and Reasons for Tea Farmers’ Adoption of Organic Farming in Pu’er City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10035-:d:1523152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Betsy Van der Veer Martens & Abby A. Goodrum, 2006. "The diffusion of theories: A functional approach," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 330-341, February.
    3. Breustedt, Gunnar & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Tiedemann, Torben, 2011. "Organic or conventional? Optimal dairy farming technology under the EU milk quota system and organic subsidies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 223-229, April.
    4. Po-Ching Wang & Fang-Chun Liu & De-Chih Lee & Ming-Ying Lin, 2023. "Environmental Knowledge, Values, and Responsibilities Help to Enhance Organic Farming Intentions: A Case Study of Yunlin County, Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Sheng Wu & Shanwei Li, 2024. "Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Eunseo Shin & Yeeun Shin & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2024. "Evaluating the Environmental Factors of Organic Farming Areas Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Qiao, Yuhui & Martin, Friederike & Cook, Seth & He, Xueqing & Halberg, Niels & Scott, Steffanie & Pan, Xihe, 2018. "Certified Organic Agriculture as an Alternative Livelihood Strategy for Small-scale Farmers in China: A Case Study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi Province," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 301-307.
    8. Lucas David & Michel Streith & Audrey Michaud & Michaël Dambrun, 2024. "Organic and Conventional Farmers’ Mental Health: A Preliminary Study on the Role of Social Psychological Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Pisanee Phromthep & Buraskorn Torut, 2024. "Comparing the Collaboration of Smallholder Farmers through Participatory Guarantee System Practices in Northeastern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Dinesh Panday & Nikita Bhusal & Saurav Das & Arash Ghalehgolabbehbahani, 2024. "Rooted in Nature: The Rise, Challenges, and Potential of Organic Farming and Fertilizers in Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa, 2024. "Government Support Mechanisms for Sustainable Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maosen Xia & Pingan Xiang & Guo Mei & Zhizhen Liu, 2023. "Drivers for the Adoption of Organic Farming: Evidence from an Analysis of Chinese Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Lukáš Čechura & Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Irena Benešová, 2021. "Productivity and Efficiency in European Milk Production: Can We Observe the Effects of Abolishing Milk Quotas?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Li Zhang & Dong Liu & Qie Yin & Jundi Liu, 2024. "Organic Certification, Online Market Access, and Agricultural Product Prices: Evidence from Chinese Apple Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Wettemann, Patrick Johannes Christopher & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2017. "An efficiency-based concept to assess potential cost and greenhouse gas savings on German dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 27-37.
    6. Ang, Frederic & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2014. "Dynamic profit inefficiency: a DEA application to Belgian dairy farms," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182649, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Jarmila Čechmánková & Vladimír Sedlařík & Silvie Duřpeková & Jan Drbohlav & Alexandra Šalaková & Radim Vácha, 2023. "Assessing the Effects of Whey Hydrogel on Nutrient Stability in Soil and Yield of Leucosinapis alba and Hordeum vulgare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Veronika Hannus & Johannes Sauer, 2021. "Understanding Farmers’ Intention to Use a Sustainability Standard: The Role of Economic Rewards, Knowledge, and Ease of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Lu, Chen-Fu & Cheng, Chia-Yi, 2023. "Exploring the distribution of organic farming: Findings from certified rice in Taiwan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Marola, Elena & Schöpfner, Judith & Gallemore, Caleb & Jespersen, Kristjan, 2020. "The bandwidth problem in telecoupled systems governance: Certifying sustainable winemaking in Australia and Chile," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő, 2024. "The relationship between the ecologisation of farms and total factor productivity: A continuous treatment analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 404-424, February.
    12. Zdenek, Radek & Lososova, Jana, 2014. "Factors Influencing The Labour Productivity In Dairy Sector In Eu," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 17(2), pages 1-7, October.
    13. Stranieri, S. & Ricci, E. & Banterle, A., 2016. "The Theory of Planned Behaviour and Food Choices: The Case of Sustainable pre-packed Salad," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244475, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Boun My, Kene & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Kim Cuong Pham, Thi & Stenger, Anne & Tiet, Tuyen & To-The, Nguyen, 2022. "Drivers of organic farming: Lab-in-the-field evidence of the role of social comparison and information nudge in networks in Vietnam," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Camila Fritzen Cidón & Paola Schmitt Figueiró & Dusan Schreiber, 2021. "Benefits of Organic Agriculture under the Perspective of the Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Thorsøe, Martin & Noe, Egon & Maye, Damian & Vigani, Mauro & Kirwan, James & Chiswell, Hannah & Grivins, Mikelis & Adamsone-Fiskovica, Anda & Tisenkopfs, Talis & Tsakalou, Emi & Aubert, Pierre-Marie &, 2020. "Responding to change: Farming system resilience in a liberalized and volatile European dairy market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Nehring, Richard & Sauer, Johannes & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Hallahan, Charlie, 2016. "United States and European Union Dairy Farms: Where Is the Competitive Edge?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(B), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Cisilino, Federica & Bodini, Antonella & Zanoli, Agostina, 2019. "Rural development programs’ impact on environment: An ex-post evaluation of organic faming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 454-462.
    19. Chen-Fu Lu & Chia-Yi Cheng, 2019. "Impacts of Spatial Clusters on Certified Organic Farming in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Frederic Ang & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2018. "Decomposing dynamic profit inefficiency of Belgian dairy farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(1), pages 81-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10035-:d:1523152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.