IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8614-d1492154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Optimization of Phosphate Recovery from Coarse Rejects Using Reverse Flotation

Author

Listed:
  • Khadija Lalam

    (Green Tech Institute (GTI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
    Laboratoire des Matériaux Avancés et de Génie des Procédés, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra 14000, Morocco)

  • Younes Chhiti

    (Green Tech Institute (GTI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
    Laboratoire des Matériaux Avancés et de Génie des Procédés, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra 14000, Morocco)

  • Mohamed El Khouakhi

    (Technology Development Cell (TechCell), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco)

  • Abdelmoughit Abidi

    (Technology Development Cell (TechCell), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco)

  • Ahmed Chebak

    (Green Tech Institute (GTI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco)

Abstract

Phosphorus is a vital nutrient essential for plant development and numerous biological functions. It is primarily obtained from phosphate rock through a process known as beneficiation. However, the declining reserves of high-grade phosphate rock, combined with the uneven global distribution of phosphorus and the environmental impacts associated with its extraction and use, highlight the need for a more efficient management of this critical resource. Increasingly, alternative sources of phosphorus, such as extraction from waste materials, are being explored. This study aims to assess the feasibility of recovering phosphorus from coarse rejects produced during phosphate beneficiation at a phosphate washing plant. Before conducting laboratory preparation and reverse flotation tests, the sample underwent initial laboratory examination and analysis. The sample was found to contain low-grade apatite minerals with a phosphorus pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ) content ranging from 19% to 20%. Additionally, carbonate and quartz were identified as the primary accompanying minerals. Flotation experiments yielded a phosphorus recovery rate of 29% P 2 O 5 , with a carbonation rate of 1.6. Although this recovery rate is slightly below the commercial phosphate standard of 30% P 2 O 5 , it represents a significant improvement and demonstrates potential for further optimization to meet industry requirements. Consequently, these coarse discarded rejects could serve as a supplementary source of phosphorus in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Khadija Lalam & Younes Chhiti & Mohamed El Khouakhi & Abdelmoughit Abidi & Ahmed Chebak, 2024. "Evaluation and Optimization of Phosphate Recovery from Coarse Rejects Using Reverse Flotation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8614-:d:1492154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Mew & Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Phosphorus Supply Chain—Scientific, Technical, and Economic Foundations: A Transdisciplinary Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Saba Daneshgar & Arianna Callegari & Andrea G. Capodaglio & David Vaccari, 2018. "The Potential Phosphorus Crisis: Resource Conservation and Possible Escape Technologies: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leticia Regueiro & Richard Newton & Mohamed Soula & Diego Méndez & Björn Kok & David C. Little & Roberto Pastres & Johan Johansen & Martiña Ferreira, 2022. "Opportunities and limitations for the introduction of circular economy principles in EU aquaculture based on the regulatory framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2033-2044, December.
    2. Viola Somogyi & Viktória Pitás & Kinga M. Berta & Róbert Kurdi, 2022. "Red Mud as Adsorbent to Recover Phosphorous from Wastewater Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Kati Martikainen & Anna-Maria Veijalainen & Eila Torvinen & Helvi Heinonen-Tanski, 2023. "Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in Small-Scale Sand Filters Fortified with Gypsum, Biotite, and Peat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Mew, Michael & Steiner, Gerald & Haneklaus, Nils & Geissler, Bernhard, 2023. "Phosphate price peaks and negotiations – Part 2: The 2008 peak and implications for the future," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Xiaoqi Liu & Jialong Lv, 2023. "Efficient Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Ca-Laden Biochar Composites Prepared from Eggshell and Peanut Shells: A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Jinzhu Wu & Yifan Li & Baojian Xu & Mei Li & Jing Wang & Yuanyuan Shao & Feiyong Chen & Meng Sun & Bing Liu, 2022. "Effects of Physicochemical Parameters on Struvite Crystallization Based on Kinetics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Houssini, Khaoula & Geng, Yong & Liu, Jing-Yu & Zeng, Xianlai & Hohl, Simon V., 2023. "Measuring anthropogenic phosphorus cycles to promote resource recovery and circularity in Morocco," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Augusto Bianchini & Jessica Rossi, 2020. "An Integrated Industry-Based Methodology to Unlock Full-Scale Implementation of Phosphorus Recovery Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Saba Daneshgar & Armando Buttafava & Doretta Capsoni & Arianna Callegari & Andrea G. Capodaglio, 2018. "Impact of pH and Ionic Molar Ratios on Phosphorous Forms Precipitation and Recovery from Different Wastewater Sludges," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Cora Eichholz & Matthias Barjenbruch & Claus-Gerhard Bannick & Peter Hartwig, 2023. "A Study on the Situation and Learnings of the Precipitant Shortage in the German Wastewater Sector," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Andrea Salimbeni & Marta Di Bianca & Andrea Maria Rizzo & David Chiaramonti, 2023. "Activated Carbon and P-Rich Fertilizer Production from Industrial Sludge by Application of an Integrated Thermo-Chemical Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Dae Wook Kim & Sung Il Yu & Kyuyong Im & Juhee Shin & Seung Gu Shin, 2022. "Responses of Coagulant Type, Dosage and Process Conditions to Phosphate Removal Efficiency from Anaerobic Sludge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, February.
    13. Saba Daneshgar & Armando Buttafava & Arianna Callegari & Andrea G. Capodaglio, 2018. "Simulations and Laboratory Tests for Assessing Phosphorus Recovery Efficiency from Sewage Sludge," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Leandro Israel da Silva & Marlon Correa Pereira & André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho & Victor Hugo Buttrós & Moacir Pasqual & Joyce Dória, 2023. "Phosphorus-Solubilizing Microorganisms: A Key to Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Joanna Rodziewicz & Artur Mielcarek & Wojciech Janczukowicz & Jorge Manuel Rodrigues Tavares & Krzysztof Jóźwiakowski, 2023. "Characteristics of Sludge from the Treatment of Soilless Plant Cultivation Wastewater in a Rotating Electrobiological Disc Contactor (REBDC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    16. N. Evelin Paucar & Chikashi Sato, 2022. "An Overview of Microbial Fuel Cells within Constructed Wetland for Simultaneous Nutrient Removal and Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    17. Kirtikumar Randive & Tejashree Raut & Sanjeevani Jawadand, 2021. "An overview of the global fertilizer trends and India’s position in 2020," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(3), pages 371-384, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8614-:d:1492154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.