IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v83y2023ics0301420723002994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phosphate price peaks and negotiations – Part 2: The 2008 peak and implications for the future

Author

Listed:
  • Mew, Michael
  • Steiner, Gerald
  • Haneklaus, Nils
  • Geissler, Bernhard

Abstract

This is Part 2 of a study examining the 1975 and 2008 price hike in the phosphate markets. While Part 1 of the companion paper introduces the system model and discusses the 1975 price hike in the phosphate market, Part 2 of the companion paper covers the major 2008 price hike, discusses similarities between the 1975 and 2008 price hike events and provides an outlook on the predictability and likeliness of future price hikes in the phosphate industry. After a period of relatively stable phosphate pricing in the 1980’s and 1990’s prices began to steadily increase as demand for phosphate fertilizers (PF) increased globally. We identified a number of interacting factors such as policies to discourage PF exports from China, subsidies for PF imports in India and increasing prizes of phosphate rock (PR) and PF from Morocco ultimately leading to the 2008 price hike. Unlike the 1975 price hike, oil prices and the US dollar evaluation did not play a major role in 2008. Similarities can be found in the still tight phosphate market in which a limited number of suppliers can enforce increased prices. There is a possibility for future price hikes to occur since PF and PR can still be considered as tight markets. We discuss predictability, likeliness, and approaches to increase resilience for the demand side to counter possible future price hikes in the phosphate industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mew, Michael & Steiner, Gerald & Haneklaus, Nils & Geissler, Bernhard, 2023. "Phosphate price peaks and negotiations – Part 2: The 2008 peak and implications for the future," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:83:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723002994
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723002994
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alhajji, A. F. & Huettner, David, 2000. "OPEC and other commodity cartels: a comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(15), pages 1151-1164, December.
    2. Michael Jedelhauser & Jonas Mehr & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Transition of the Swiss Phosphorus System towards a Circular Economy—Part 2: Socio-Technical Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Michael C. Mew & Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Phosphorus Supply Chain—Scientific, Technical, and Economic Foundations: A Transdisciplinary Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Friedrich-W. Wellmer & Roland W. Scholz, 2017. "Putting Phosphorus First: The Need to Know and Right to Know Call for a Revised Hierarchy of Natural Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Sheng Li & Yaoqi Zhang & Denis Nadolnyak & John David Wesley & Yifei Zhang, 2014. "Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 433-451, August.
    6. Jonas Mehr & Michael Jedelhauser & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Transition of the Swiss Phosphorus System towards a Circular Economy—Part 1: Current State and Historical Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Geissler, Bernhard & Mew, Michael C. & Weber, Olaf & Steiner, Gerald, 2015. "Efficiency performance of the world's leading corporations in phosphate rock mining," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 246-258.
    8. Sheng Li & Yaoqi Zhang & Denis Nadolnyak & John David Wesley & Yifei Zhang, 2014. "Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 433-451, August.
    9. Steiner, Gerald & Geissler, Bernhard & Watson, Ingrid & Mew, Michael C., 2015. "Efficiency developments in phosphate rock mining over the last three decades," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 235-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geissler, Bernhard & Steiner, Gerald & Haneklaus, Nils & Mew, Michael, 2023. "Phosphate price peaks and negotiations – Part 1: Fundamentals and the 1975 peak," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Sustainable Mineral Resource Management—Insights into the Case of Phosphorus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Geissler, Bernhard & Steiner, Gerald & Haneklaus, Nils & Mew, Michael, 2023. "Phosphate price peaks and negotiations – Part 1: Fundamentals and the 1975 peak," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Luca Adami & Marco Schiavon, 2021. "From Circular Economy to Circular Ecology: A Review on the Solution of Environmental Problems through Circular Waste Management Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Scholz, Roland W. & Wellmer, Friedrich-Wilhelm, 2015. "Losses and use efficiencies along the phosphorus cycle – Part 2: Understanding the concept of efficiency," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 259-274.
    5. Carla Mae Jabar Pausta & Michael Angelo Baliwag Promentilla & Alberto Leyes Longos & Aileen Huelgas Orbecido & Arnel Bas Beltran & Regina Gador Damalerio & Maria Eda Apple Artesano Suplido & Devendra , 2023. "Resource-Oriented Sanitation: On-Farm Septage Treatment and Nutrient Recycling for Sustainable Agriculture in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Friedrich-Wilhelm Wellmer & Roland W. Scholz, 2018. "What Is the Optimal and Sustainable Lifetime of a Mine?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Belu Mănescu, Cristiana & Nuño, Galo, 2015. "Quantitative effects of the shale oil revolution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 855-866.
    8. Ahmad Hosseinzadeh & Russell Smyth & Abbas Valadkhani & Amir Moradi, 2018. "What determines the efficiency of Australian mining companies?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(1), pages 121-138, January.
    9. Kisswani, Khalid M., 2016. "Does OPEC act as a cartel? Empirical investigation of coordination behavior," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 171-180.
    10. Bharati, Rakesh & Crain, Susan J. & Kaminski, Vincent, 2012. "Clustering in crude oil prices and the target pricing zone hypothesis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1115-1123.
    11. Ng, Sin Jin & Li, Bing & He, Zhengyang & Han, Jing-Cheng & Munir, Muhammad Tajammal & Wu, Xiaofeng & Huang, Yuefei, 2023. "Global phosphorus cycling: The impact of international commercial trading and the path towards sustainable phosphorus management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    12. Brémond, Vincent & Hache, Emmanuel & Mignon, Valérie, 2012. "Does OPEC still exist as a cartel? An empirical investigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 125-131.
    13. Wood, Aaron D. & Mason, Charles F. & Finnoff, David, 2016. "OPEC, the Seven Sisters, and oil market dominance: An evolutionary game theory and agent-based modeling approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 66-78.
    14. Hochman, Gal & Zilberman, David, 2015. "The political economy of OPEC," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 203-216.
    15. Kheiravar, Khaled H, 2019. "Economic and Econometric Analyses of the World Petroleum Industry, Energy Subsidies, and Air Pollution," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3gj151w9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Nafiisa Sobratee & Rashieda Davids & Chuma B. Chinzila & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Pauline Scheelbeek & Albert T. Modi & Alan D. Dangour & Rob Slotow, 2022. "Visioning a Food System for an Equitable Transition towards Sustainable Diets—A South African Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Cairns, Robert D. & Calfucura, Enrique, 2012. "OPEC: Market failure or power failure?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 570-580.
    18. Gabriel Gerner & Jae Wook Chung & Luca Meyer & Rahel Wanner & Simon Heiniger & Daniel Seiler & Rolf Krebs & Alexander Treichler & Roman Kontic & Beatrice Kulli, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge: New Improvements in Phosphatic Fertilizer Production and Process Water Treatment Using Freeze Concentration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Roland W. Scholz & Gerald Steiner, 2022. "The role of transdisciplinarity for mineral economics and mineral resource management: coping with fallacies related to phosphorus in science and practice," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 745-763, December.
    20. Berk, Istemi & Çam , Eren, 2019. "The Shift in Global Crude Oil Market Structure: A model-based analysis of the period 2013–2017," EWI Working Papers 2019-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:83:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723002994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.