IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6944-d1455573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Clustering Approach for Analyzing Access to Public Transportation and Destinations

Author

Listed:
  • Mudassar Shafiq

    (CITTA—Centro de Investigação do Territórios dos Transportes e Ambiente, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Hudyeron Rocha

    (CITTA—Centro de Investigação do Territórios dos Transportes e Ambiente, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • António Couto

    (CITTA—Centro de Investigação do Territórios dos Transportes e Ambiente, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Sara Ferreira

    (CITTA—Centro de Investigação do Territórios dos Transportes e Ambiente, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Promoting sustainable and equitable public transportation services is essential for addressing disparities and preventing social exclusion among diverse population groups for daily activities. This paper proposes a comprehensive approach to assess transport disadvantages and identify areas with limited access to public transport and services. By combining statistical and geographic techniques, we analyze demographic, socioeconomic, and travel data to spatially contextualize areas based on the social structure and understand the characteristics of population groups facing transportation challenges in the Porto Metropolitan Area. Cluster analysis results revealed four distinct clusters with homogeneous characteristics. In contrast, service area analysis assessed the public transport coverage to identify served zones, the population within these zones, and activities reached in the region. Our findings indicate that suburban and rural areas often lack access to public transport stops, aggravated by lower service frequencies, leading to high reliance on private cars for essential activities, such as work and education. Despite the good geographical coverage of rail and bus stops, urban and central–urban areas also suffer from inadequate service frequencies, impacting public transport usage. Improving service quality in high-demand areas could encourage greater public transport utilization and enhance accessibility. Identifying areas facing inequities facilitates targeted policy interventions and prioritized investments to improve accessibility and address mobility needs to access services effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mudassar Shafiq & Hudyeron Rocha & António Couto & Sara Ferreira, 2024. "A Clustering Approach for Analyzing Access to Public Transportation and Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6944-:d:1455573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blumenberg, Evelyn A. & Shiki, Kimiko, 2003. "How Welfare Recipients Travel on Public Transit, and Their Accessibility to Employment Outside Large Urban Centers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt04k2w2k7, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Hudyeron Rocha & Manuel Filgueiras & José Pedro Tavares & Sara Ferreira, 2023. "Public Transport Usage and Perceived Service Quality in a Large Metropolitan Area: The Case of Porto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Wang, Chih-Hao & Chen, Na, 2015. "A GIS-based spatial statistical approach to modeling job accessibility by transportation mode: case study of Columbus, Ohio," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Ahmed El-Geneidy & Michael Grimsrud & Rania Wasfi & Paul Tétreault & Julien Surprenant-Legault, 2014. "New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 193-210, January.
    5. Hudyeron Rocha & António Lobo & José Pedro Tavares & Sara Ferreira, 2023. "Exploring Modal Choices for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Insights from the Porto Metropolitan Area in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Hong Sok Kim & Eungcheol Kim, 2004. "Effects Of Public Transit On Automobile Ownership And Use In Households Of The Usa," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 245-262, November.
    7. Mavoa, Suzanne & Witten, Karen & McCreanor, Tim & O’Sullivan, David, 2012. "GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 15-22.
    8. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisa Borowski & Alireza Ermagun & David Levinson, 2018. "Disparity of Access: Variations in Transit Service by Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Auto Availability," Working Papers 175, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    2. Roberto Rendeiro Martín-Cejas & Rafael Suárez Vega & Pedro Pablo Ramírez Sánchez, 2021. "GIS Approach Applied to Tourist Bus Route Design on Lanzarote Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Saghapour, Tayebeh & Moridpour, Sara & Thompson, Russell G., 2016. "Public transport accessibility in metropolitan areas: A new approach incorporating population density," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 273-285.
    4. Barajas, Jesus M. & Brown, Anne, 2021. "Not minding the gap: Does ride-hailing serve transit deserts?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Xueming (Jimmy) Chen, 2018. "Review of the Transit Accessibility Concept: A Case Study of Richmond, Virginia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Roberto Rendeiro Martín-Cejas & Rafael Suárez Vega & Pedro Pablo Ramirez Sanchez, 2021. "GIS Approach Applied to Tourist Bus Route Design on Lanzarote Island," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/351788, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2019. "A spatially-explicit method for analyzing the equity of transit commuters' accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 31-42.
    8. Chen, Jie & Ni, Jianhua & Xi, Changbai & Li, Siqian & Wang, Jiechen, 2017. "Determining intra-urban spatial accessibility disparities in multimodal public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 123-133.
    9. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    10. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    12. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    13. Rui Xiao & Guofeng Wang & Meng Wang, 2018. "Transportation Disadvantage and Neighborhood Sociodemographics: A Composite Indicator Approach to Examining Social Inequalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 29-43, May.
    14. Manout, Ouassim & Bonnel, Patrick & Bouzouina, Louafi, 2018. "Transit accessibility: A new definition of transit connectors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-100.
    15. Chandra, Shailesh & Jimenez, Jose & Radhakrishnan, Ramalingam, 2017. "Accessibility evaluations for nighttime walking and bicycling for low-income shift workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 97-108.
    16. Helai Huang & Jialing Wu & Fang Liu & Yiwei Wang, 2020. "Measuring Accessibility Based on Improved Impedance and Attractive Functions Using Taxi Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Tanya Suhoy & Yotam Sofer, 2019. "Getting to Work in Israel: Locality and Individual Effects," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2019.02, Bank of Israel.
    18. Sangeetha Ann & Meilan Jiang & Ghasak Ibrahim Mothafer & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2019. "Examination on the Influence Area of Transit-Oriented Development: Considering Multimodal Accessibility in New Delhi, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Lissy La Paix & Karst Geurs, 2015. "Scenarios for measuring station-based impedances in a national transport model," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1310, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Zhouying Song, 2022. "The geography of online shopping in China and its key drivers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 259-274, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6944-:d:1455573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.