IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6776-d1451804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Torfing

    (Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark)

  • Christopher Ansell

    (Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Eva Sørensen

    (Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark)

Abstract

While the planet Earth will survive the accelerating climate and nature crisis, humankind may not. As part of its work to halt the global climate and nature crisis, while generating a distributed prosperity, the United Nations has unanimously agreed on sustainable development goals. The achievement of these goals depends on the mobilization of local knowledge and resources, and the creation of a sense of joint ownership over new and bold solutions. Co-creation that brings together relevant and affected actors in emergent processes of collaboration, learning, and innovation offer a path to localized green transitions. However, little is known about how public governance can prompt, support, and scaffold the local co-creation of green solutions. Bridging extant literatures in the field of collaborative and networked governance, this theory-building article aims to identify a number of governance factors conducive for the local co-creation of green transitions. The resulting theoretical framework allows us to conjecture about which governance factors will be critical in different socio-political contexts, thus facilitating future studies of contrasted governance paths to local green co-creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Torfing & Christopher Ansell & Eva Sørensen, 2024. "Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6776-:d:1451804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Hughes & Daniel Miller Runfola & Benjamin Cormier, 2018. "Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(2), pages 192-212, March.
    2. Ansell,Christopher & Torfing,Jacob, 2021. "Public Governance as Co-creation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108487047, November.
    3. Jacob Torfing, 2023. "Rethinking Public Governance," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19399.
    4. ., 2003. "System patterns: dominant governmental direction," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 7, pages 97-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    6. ., 2003. "Coordination routines: governance," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 5, pages 70-81, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ingmar van Meerkerk & Jurian Edelenbos, 2018. "Facilitating conditions for boundary-spanning behaviour in governance networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 503-524, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulbricht, Lena & Yeung, Karen, 2021. "Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 3-22.
    2. Wiwandari Handayani & S. P. Dewi & Bintang Septiarani, 2023. "Toward adaptive water governance: An examination on stakeholders engagement and interactions in Semarang City, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1914-1943, February.
    3. Kenji Otsuka, 2022. "Co‐optation in co‐production: Maintaining credibility and legitimacy in transboundary environmental governance in East Asia," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 771-797, November.
    4. Marco Roth & Jarmo Vakkuri & Jan-Erik Johanson, 2024. "Value creation mechanisms in a social and health care innovation ecosystem – an institutional perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1017-1048, December.
    5. Didier Wernli & Lucas Böttcher & Flore Vanackere & Yuliya Kaspiarovich & Maria Masood & Nicolas Levrat, 2023. "Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 207-228, May.
    6. Sumit Vij, 2023. "Polycentric disaster governance in a federalising Nepal: interplay between people, bureaucracy and political leadership," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 755-776, December.
    7. Janssen, Matthijs & Wanzenböck, Iris & Fünfschilling, Lea & Pontinakis, Dimitris, 2023. "Governance arrangements for the implementation of transformative innovation policy: Insights from a comparative case study," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/13, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    8. Tony Kinder & Jari Stenvall & Antti Talonen, 2023. "Logics and Agency in Public Management Research," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 159-180, March.
    9. Su, Xiaobo, 2024. "Security, economy, and the touristification of borders," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Kinder Sebastian & Lis Kamil & Peiker Wolfdietrich & Suwala Lech, 2014. "The Challenging Task of Governing Cross-Border Investment in Peripheral Regions: Polish Investors in Northeast Germany," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 27-41.
    11. D. Diakité & A. Royer & D. Rousselière & L.D. Tamini, 2022. "Formal and informal governance mechanisms of machinery cooperatives: The case of Quebec," Post-Print hal-03833870, HAL.
    12. Anmol Soni & Justina Jose & Gordon A. Kingsley, 2023. "When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1026-1057, November.
    13. David Switzer & Jiwoong Jung, 2023. "Contextual responsiveness in U.S. local government climate policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 920-949, November.
    14. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    15. Olga I. Timofeeva, 2022. "Methodology and Results of Measuring the Transparency of Russian Regional Budgets," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 44-58, December.
    16. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    17. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    18. Laura Carmouze & Christophe Alaux & Fouchet Robert, 2021. "Co-construire les services publics locaux : une approche stratégique de la participation des parties prenantes externes. Cas de l’analyse des besoins sociaux dans des centres communaux d’action social," Post-Print hal-04188705, HAL.
    19. Patrick S. Roberts & Jon Schmid, 2022. "Government‐led innovation acceleration: Case studies of US federal government innovation and technology acceleration organizations," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 353-378, May.
    20. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6776-:d:1451804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.