IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v40y2023i6p1026-1057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions

Author

Listed:
  • Anmol Soni
  • Justina Jose
  • Gordon A. Kingsley

Abstract

Cities face substantial risks of economic and physical losses from repeated exposure to climate hazards exacerbated by climate change. Drawing from the climate action and policy mix literatures, this study conceptualizes “climate action mix” defined as the diverse policy actions adopted by city governments to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate hazards. This study makes a key contribution by analyzing the relation between the variety of hazards and the diversity of cities' climate action mixes. Deploying a modified Shannon diversity index, we develop a new measure of climate action mix by considering the breadth across different actions, and the depth of these efforts as measured by the progress along the policy cycle. We study an expansive range of mitigation and adaptation actions without imposing any domain or jurisdictional limitations in 162 cities across the United States. The analysis reveals a bifurcation in approaches where some cities have not adopted any policies, while others have a diverse mix of adaptation and mitigation actions in various stages of policy progression. We find that climate hazards drive local action—cities that experience multiple threats react by taking a diverse mix of climate actions. Cities broadly utilize global climate networks that offer policy learning opportunities and local networks that might promote a shared understanding of environmental threats leading to diverse climate action mixes. Finally, a city's capacity to develop climate adaptation and mitigation plans is positively related to a diverse portfolio of climate actions. Las ciudades enfrentan riesgos sustanciales de pérdidas económicas y físicas por la exposición repetida a los peligros climáticos exacerbados por el cambio climático. A partir de la literatura sobre la acción climática y la combinación de políticas, este estudio conceptualiza la "combinación de acciones climáticas" definida como las diversas acciones políticas adoptadas por los gobiernos de las ciudades para adaptarse y mitigar los efectos de las amenazas climáticas. Este estudio hace una contribución clave al analizar la relación entre la variedad de amenazas y la diversidad de combinaciones de acción climática de las ciudades. Al implementar un índice de diversidad de Shannon modificado, desarrollamos una nueva medida de la combinación de acciones climáticas al considerar la amplitud de las diferentes acciones y la profundidad de estos esfuerzos medidos por el progreso a lo largo del ciclo de políticas. Estudiamos una amplia gama de acciones de mitigación y adaptación sin imponer ningún dominio o limitaciones jurisdiccionales en 162 ciudades de los Estados Unidos. El análisis revela una bifurcación en los enfoques donde algunas ciudades no han adoptado ninguna política, mientras que otras tienen una combinación diversa de acciones de adaptación y mitigación en varias etapas de avance de la política. Descubrimos que los peligros climáticos impulsan la acción local: las ciudades que experimentan múltiples amenazas reaccionan tomando una combinación diversa de acciones climáticas. Las ciudades utilizan ampliamente las redes climáticas globales que ofrecen oportunidades de aprendizaje de políticas y redes locales que pueden promover una comprensión compartida de las amenazas ambientales que conducen a diversas combinaciones de acciones climáticas. Finalmente, la capacidad de una ciudad para desarrollar planes de adaptación y mitigación climática se relaciona positivamente con una cartera diversa de acciones climáticas. 气候变化加剧了气候危害,而反复暴露于这一危害的城市面临着巨大的经济和物质损失风险。基于有关气候行动和政策组合的文献,本研究将“气候行动组合”概念化为城市政府为适应和减轻气候危害影响而采取的多种政策行动。本研究通过分析危害种类与城市气候行动组合的多样性之间的关系,从而作出了重要贡献。通过使用一项经过修改的香农多样性指数,我们提出了一种新的气候行动组合衡量标准,即考量不同行动的广度以及由政策周期的进展加以衡量的行动深度。在没有施加任何领域限制或管辖限制的情况下,我们对美国162个城市的缓解和适应行动的范围进行了研究。分析揭示了行动存在的分歧,即一些城市没有采取任何政策,而另一些城市在政策进展的不同阶段采取了多样化的适应和缓解行动组合。我们发现,气候危害推动了地方行动——遭受多重威胁的城市通过采取多种气候行动组合来作出反应。城市广泛利用一系列提供政策学习机会的全球气候网络以及一系列可能促进关于环境威胁的共同理解的地方网络,这些举措导致了多种气候行动组合。最后,一个城市在制定气候适应和缓解计划方面的能力与多种气候行动组合呈正相关。

Suggested Citation

  • Anmol Soni & Justina Jose & Gordon A. Kingsley, 2023. "When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1026-1057, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:1026-1057
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christof Brandtner & David Suárez, 2021. "The Structure of City Action : Institutional Embeddedness and Sustainability Practices in U.S. Cities," Post-Print hal-03188205, HAL.
    2. Sara Hughes & Daniel Miller Runfola & Benjamin Cormier, 2018. "Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(2), pages 192-212, March.
    3. Stelios Grafakos & Kate Trigg & Mia Landauer & Lorenzo Chelleri & Shobhakar Dhakal, 2019. "Analytical framework to evaluate the level of integration of climate adaptation and mitigation in cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 87-106, May.
    4. Ekaterina Domorenok & Anthony R. Zito, 2021. "Engines of learning? Policy instruments, cities and climate governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 507-528, September.
    5. Nicola Ulibarri & Idowu Ajibade & Eranga K. Galappaththi & Elphin Tom Joe & Alexandra Lesnikowski & Katharine J. Mach & Justice Issah Musah-Surugu & Gabriela Nagle Alverio & Alcade C. Segnon & A.R. Si, 2022. "A global assessment of policy tools to support climate adaptation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 77-96, January.
    6. Mia Landauer & Sirkku Juhola & Johannes Klein, 2019. "The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(5), pages 741-765, April.
    7. Mark Watts, 2017. "Cities spearhead climate action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 537-538, August.
    8. Chris Koski & Alma Siulagi, 2016. "Environmental Harm or Natural Hazard? Problem Identification and Adaptation in U.S. Municipal Climate Action Plans," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 33(3), pages 270-290, May.
    9. Zhenghong Tang & Samuel Brody & Courtney Quinn & Liang Chang & Ting Wei, 2010. "Moving from agenda to action: evaluating local climate change action plans," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 41-62.
    10. Daniel Ryan, 2015. "From commitment to action: a literature review on climate policy implementation at city level," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 519-529, August.
    11. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    12. Daniel Nohrstedt & Jacob Hileman & Maurizio Mazzoleni & Giuliano Baldassarre & Charles F. Parker, 2022. "Exploring disaster impacts on adaptation actions in 549 cities worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Deserai A. Crow & Elizabeth A. Albright & Todd Ely & Elizabeth Koebele & Lydia Lawhon, 2018. "Do Disasters Lead to Learning? Financial Policy Change in Local Government," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(4), pages 564-589, July.
    14. Kelly Levin & Benjamin Cashore & Steven Bernstein & Graeme Auld, 2012. "Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 123-152, June.
    15. Rachel M. Krause, 2012. "An Assessment of the Impact that Participation in Local Climate Networks Has on Cities’ Implementation of Climate, Energy, and Transportation Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(5), pages 585-604, September.
    16. Hyunjung Ji & Nicole Darnall, 2018. "All are not created equal: assessing local governments’ strategic approaches towards sustainability," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 154-175, January.
    17. Leanne Giordono & Hilary Boudet & Alexander Gard-Murray, 2020. "Local adaptation policy responses to extreme weather events," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 609-636, December.
    18. Marlene Kammerer & Chandreyee Namhata, 2018. "What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 477-513, December.
    19. Taedong Lee & Susan Meene, 2012. "Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 199-220, September.
    20. Hyunjung Ji & Mark Patrick Tate, 2021. "Spillover effects of central cities on sustainability efforts in a metropolitan area," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 95-121, March.
    21. Stéphane Hallegatte & Jan Corfee-Morlot, 2011. "Understanding climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation at city scale: an introduction," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 1-12, January.
    22. J. A. Bouma & M. Verbraak & F. Dietz & R. Brouwer, 2019. "Policy mix: mess or merit?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 32-47, January.
    23. Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2012. "Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1770-1778.
    24. Florian Kern & Michael Howlett, 2009. "Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 391-408, November.
    25. Andrew Pattison, 2018. "Factors Shaping Policy Learning: A Study of Policy Actors in Subnational Climate and Energy Issues," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(4), pages 535-563, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Nagel & Marlene Kammerer, 2023. "Tackling climate change on the local level: A growing research agenda," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 846-852, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imbert, Enrica & Ladu, Luana & Morone, Piergiuseppe & Quitzow, Rainer, 2017. "Policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: the case of Italy and Germany," MPRA Paper 78143, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Marc Dijk & Eric Iversen & Antje Klitkou & René Kemp & Simon Bolwig & Mads Borup & Peter Møllgaard, 2020. "Forks in the Road to E-Mobility: An Evaluation of Instrument Interaction in National Policy Mixes in Northwest Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Rogge, Karoline S. & Schleich, Joachim, 2018. "Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1639-1654.
    4. Schmidt, Tobias S. & Sewerin, Sebastian, 2019. "Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    5. Kai Schulze & Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2023. "Measuring climate change adaptation policy output: Toward a two‐dimensional approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1058-1092, November.
    6. Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S. & Howlett, Michael, 2019. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    7. Andreas Corcaci & Jörg Kemmerzell, 2023. "Trans‐local action and local climate policy. Configurations of success for climate innovations in the European multilevel system," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1120-1143, November.
    8. Diercks, Gijs, 2019. "Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    9. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    10. Vincent Wretling & Berit Balfors, 2021. "Building Institutional Capacity to Plan for Climate Neutrality: The Role of Local Co-Operation and Inter-Municipal Networks at the Regional Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Antje Otto & Kristine Kern & Wolfgang Haupt & Peter Eckersley & Annegret H. Thieken, 2021. "Ranking local climate policy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Sampsa Hyysalo & Jani Lukkarinen & Paula Kivimaa & Raimo Lovio & Armi Temmes & Mikael Hildén & Tatu Marttila & Karoliina Auvinen & Sofi Perikangas & Allu Pyhälammi & Janne Peljo & Kaisa Savolainen & L, 2019. "Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark & Seter, Hanne, 2021. "Policy and politics in energy transitions. A case study on shore power in Oslo," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Hilde Nykamp, 2020. "Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Knoeri, Christof & Hoppmann, Joern & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "Beyond innovation and deployment: Modeling the impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies in Germany's solar policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    16. Most Asikha Aktar & Mukaramah Binti & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2020. "Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy for Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-03519872, HAL.
    17. Giliberto Capano & Benedetto Lepori, 2024. "Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 53-82, March.
    18. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Yuchen & Zhao, Xiaoli & Farnoosh, Arash & Ma, Ruoran, 2024. "Synergistic effect of environmental governance instruments embedded in social contexts: A case study of China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Oliver Heidrich & Richard Dawson & Diana Reckien & Claire Walsh, 2013. "Assessment of the climate preparedness of 30 urban areas in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 771-784, October.
    20. Edmondson, Duncan L. & Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S., 2019. "The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:1026-1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.