IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v35y2018i2p192-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Hughes
  • Daniel Miller Runfola
  • Benjamin Cormier

Abstract

The policy choices of local governments are highly relevant today, but we know relatively little about how or when local governments choose to respond to a given issue and why this might vary between policy areas. A key variant for local governments is the proximity of policy issues: they are engaged in solving local, regional, and global problems. Using evidence from the United States on the policy issues of social inclusion, watershed management, and climate change, we demonstrate that the drivers of policy response vary with the proximity of the problem. When an issue is highly local, policy response is influenced by problem severity; when an issue is global, policy response is influenced by local political leanings; and when an issue is regional, policy response is driven by the actions of neighboring and state level governments. Local governments consider different factors and respond to different cues when engaging with different types of policy issues. Our findings provide a more nuanced understanding of sustainability policy adoption in local governments, and further our understanding of the domain†contingent nature of policy response in local governments and the structuring role of problem proximity.地方政府的议题接近性和政策回应 如今地方政府的政策选择呈现高度相关性, ä½†æˆ‘ä»¬å‡ ä¹Žä¸ äº†è§£çš„æ˜¯, 地方政府会如何〠或在何时选择回应既定议题, ä»¥å Šä¸ºä»€ä¹ˆä¸ å Œæ”¿ç­–é¢†åŸŸä¹‹é—´è¿™ä¸€æƒ…å†µä¼šæœ‰å·®å¼‚ã€‚æœ¬åœ°æ”¿åºœé—´å­˜åœ¨çš„å…³é”®å ˜é‡ æ˜¯æ”¿ç­–è®®é¢˜çš„æŽ¥è¿‘æ€§ï¼šè¿™äº›è®®é¢˜ç”¨äºŽè§£å†³æœ¬åœ°ã€ åŒºåŸŸå’Œå…¨ç ƒé—®é¢˜ã€‚é€šè¿‡ä½¿ç”¨ç¾Žå›½é’ˆå¯¹ç¤¾ä¼šåŒ…å®¹ï¼ˆsocial inclusionï¼‰ã€ æµ åŸŸç®¡ç †å’Œæ°”å€™å ˜åŒ–çš„æ”¿ç­–è®®é¢˜æ‰€å¾—å‡ºçš„è¯ æ ®, æœ¬æ–‡è¯ æ˜Ž, é©±åŠ¨æ”¿ç­–å›žåº”çš„å› ç´ ä¼šç”±äºŽé—®é¢˜æŽ¥è¿‘æ€§è€Œå ˜åŒ–ã€‚å½“è®®é¢˜å‘ˆçŽ°é«˜åº¦æœ¬åœ°åŒ–æ—¶, é—®é¢˜ä¸¥é‡ æ€§ä¼šå½±å“ æ”¿ç­–å›žåº”ï¼›å½“è®®é¢˜å‘ˆçŽ°å…¨ç ƒåŒ–æ—¶, æœ¬åœ°æ”¿æ²»å€¾å ‘ä¼šå½±å“ æ”¿ç­–å›žåº”ï¼›å½“è®®é¢˜å‘ˆçŽ°åŒºåŸŸåŒ–æ—¶, é¢†å›½æ”¿åºœå’Œå›½å®¶æ”¿åºœä¼šé©±åŠ¨æ”¿ç­–å›žåº”ã€‚æœ¬åœ°æ”¿åºœä¼šè€ƒé‡ ä¸ å Œå› ç´ , å¹¶åœ¨å¤„ç †ä¸ å Œç±»åž‹çš„æ”¿ç­–è®®é¢˜æ—¶å¯¹ä¸ å Œä¿¡å ·äºˆä»¥å›žåº”ã€‚æœ¬æ–‡ç ”ç©¶ç»“æžœä¸ºæœ¬åœ°æ”¿åºœå…³äºŽé‡‡çº³å ¯æŒ ç»­æ”¿ç­–æ ä¾›äº†ç»†è‡´å…¥å¾®çš„è§ è§£, å Œæ—¶è¿›ä¸€æ­¥åŠ æ·±äº†å¯¹æœ¬åœ°æ”¿åºœæ”¿ç­–å›žåº”çš„é¢†åŸŸä¾ èµ–æ€§ã€ ä»¥å Šé—®é¢˜æŽ¥è¿‘æ€§çš„ç»“æž„æ€§è§’è‰²çš„ç †è§£ã€‚Proximidad de temas y respuesta a las políticas en gobiernos locales Las elecciones políticas de los gobiernos locales son muy relevantes hoy en día, pero sabemos relativamente poco acerca de cómo o cuándo los gobiernos locales eligen responder a un tema específico y por qué esto podría variar entre las áreas políticas. Una variable clave para los gobiernos locales es la proximidad a los temas políticos: están involucrados en la solución de problemas locales, regionales y globales. Utilizando evidencia de los temas políticos de Estados Unidos acerca de la inclusión social, el manejo de cuencas y el cambio climático, demostramos que los factores que impulsan las respuestas varían dependiendo de la proximidad al problema. Cuando un tema es altamente local, la respuesta política está influenciada por la gravedad del problema; cuando un tema es regional, la respuesta política está influenciada por las preferencias políticas; y cuando un problema es regional, la respuesta política es impulsada por las acciones de los gobiernos vecinos y gobiernos a nivel estatal. Los gobiernos locales consideran diferentes factores y responden a diferentes pistas cuando tratan con diferentes tipos de temas políticos. Nuestros hallazgos proporcionan un entendimiento más detallado de la adopción de políticas de sustentabilidad en gobiernos locales, e incrementan nuestra comprensión de la dependencia en el dominio que es una característica de la respuesta a las políticas en los gobiernos locales y el papel estructurador de la proximidad a los temas.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Hughes & Daniel Miller Runfola & Benjamin Cormier, 2018. "Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(2), pages 192-212, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:192-212
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angel Hsu & Li Lili & Marco Schletz & Zhitong Yu, 2024. "Chinese cities as digital environmental governance innovators: Evidence from subnational low-Carbon plans," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 572-589, March.
    2. Iris Hui & Gemma Smith & Caroline Kimmel, 2019. "Think globally, act locally: adoption of climate action plans in California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 489-509, August.
    3. Vanesa Castán Broto & Linda K. Westman, 2020. "Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    4. David Switzer, 2020. "The Context of Responsiveness: Resident Preferences, Water Scarcity, and Municipal Conservation Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(2), pages 260-279, March.
    5. Helmke-Long, Laura & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2022. "Municipal government adaptive capacity programs for vulnerable populations during the U.S. energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Jacob Torfing & Christopher Ansell & Eva Sørensen, 2024. "Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:192-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.