IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6433-d1444179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Gap between Biowaste and Biomethane Production: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Methodological Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Charalampos Toufexis

    (Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dimitrios-Orfeas Makris

    (Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christos Vlachokostas

    (Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Alexandra V. Michailidou

    (Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christos Mertzanakis

    (Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Athanasia Vachtsiavanou

    (Department of Procurement, Services and Projects, Waste Management of Western Macedonia Region, General Commercial Registry G.E.MI.: 122074536000, 6th km Kozani-Ptolemaida Rd., 50150 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising biowaste valorization technology for sustainable energy, circular economy, local energy community growth, and supporting local authorities’ environmental goals. This paper presents a systematic review meta-analysis methodology for biomethane estimation, using over 600 values of volatile solids (VS) content and biochemical methane potential (BMP) of six different waste streams, collected from 240 scientific studies. The waste streams include cow manure (CM), sheep/goat manure (SGM), wheat straw (WS), household waste (HW), organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), and sewage sludge (SS). The statistical analysis showed a mean VS content of 11.9% (CM), 37.3% (SGM), 83.1% (WS), 20.8% (HW), 19.4% (OFMSW), and 10.6% (SS), with BMP values of 204.6, 184.1, 305.1, 361.7, 308.3, and 273.1 L CH 4 /kg VS, respectively. The case study of Kozani, Greece, demonstrated the methodology’s applicability, revealing a potential annual CH 4 production of 15,429,102 m 3 (corresponding to 551 TJ of energy), with SGM, WS, and CM as key substrates. Kozani, aiming for climate neutrality by 2030, currently employs conventional waste management, like composting, while many local business residual streams remain unused. The proposed model facilitates the design and implementation of AD units for a sustainable, climate-neutral future.

Suggested Citation

  • Charalampos Toufexis & Dimitrios-Orfeas Makris & Christos Vlachokostas & Alexandra V. Michailidou & Christos Mertzanakis & Athanasia Vachtsiavanou, 2024. "Bridging the Gap between Biowaste and Biomethane Production: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Methodological Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6433-:d:1444179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    2. Krishania, M. & Vijay, V.K. & Chandra, R., 2013. "Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 359-367.
    3. Jonas A. Ohlsson & Ann-Christin Rönnberg-Wästljung & Nils-Erik Nordh & Anna Schnürer, 2020. "Co-Digestion of Salix and Manure for Biogas: Importance of Clone Choice, Coppicing Frequency and Reactor Setup," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Lehtomäki, A. & Huttunen, S. & Rintala, J.A., 2007. "Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 591-609.
    5. José María Fernández-González & Carmen Díaz-López & Jaime Martín-Pascual & Montserrat Zamorano, 2020. "Recycling Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Tiago Miguel Cabrita & Maria Teresa Santos, 2023. "Biochemical Methane Potential Assays for Organic Wastes as an Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Harjinder Kaur & Raghava R. Kommalapati, 2023. "Process Optimization and Biomethane Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Agro-Industry Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Jann Michael Weinand & Fabian Scheller & Russell McKenna, 2020. "Reviewing energy system modelling of decentralized energy autonomy," Papers 2011.05915, arXiv.org.
    9. Yong, Zihan & Dong, Yulin & Zhang, Xu & Tan, Tianwei, 2015. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 527-530.
    10. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. O’Shea, Richard & Kilgallon, Ian & Wall, David & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Quantification and location of a renewable gas industry based on digestion of wastes in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 229-239.
    12. Shubham Dilip Sarode & Deepak Kumar & Divya Mathias & David McNeill & Prasad Kaparaju, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Spoiled Maize, Lucerne and Barley Silage Mixture with and without Cow Manure: Methane Yields and Kinetic Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Weinand, Jann & Scheller, Fabian Johannes & McKenna, Russell, 2020. "Reviewing energy system modelling of decentralized energy autonomy," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 41, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    14. Na Wang & Chunmeng Chui & Siying Zhang & Qianjing Liu & Baoguo Li & Jiping Shi & Li Liu, 2022. "Hydrogen Production by the Thermophilic Dry Anaerobic Co-Fermentation of Food Waste Utilizing Garden Waste or Kitchen Waste as Co-Substrate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Li, Wangliang & Loh, Kai-Chee & Zhang, Jingxin & Tong, Yen Wah & Dai, Yanjun, 2018. "Two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste and horticultural waste in high-solid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 400-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Theresa Liegl & Simon Schramm & Philipp Kuhn & Thomas Hamacher, 2023. "Considering Socio-Technical Parameters in Energy System Models—The Current Status and Next Steps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Christoph Schick & Nikolai Klempp & Kai Hufendiek, 2021. "Impact of Network Charge Design in an Energy System with Large Penetration of Renewables and High Prosumer Shares," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Yan, Xiaopeng & Chen, Baijin, 2021. "Analysis of a novel energy-efficient system with 3-D vertical structure for hydraulic press," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Ádám Sleisz & Dániel Divényi & Beáta Polgári & Péter Sőrés & Dávid Raisz, 2022. "A Novel Cost Allocation Mechanism for Local Flexibility in the Power System with Partial Disintermediation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Sacha Hodencq & Mathieu Brugeron & Jaume Fitó & Lou Morriet & Benoit Delinchant & Frédéric Wurtz, 2021. "OMEGAlpes, an Open-Source Optimisation Model Generation Tool to Support Energy Stakeholders at District Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Vögele, Stefan & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Kleinebrahm, Max & Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang & Bernhard, Jesse & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm & Weiss, Annika, 2022. "Dissemination of PV-Battery systems in the German residential sector up to 2050: Technological diffusion from multidisciplinary perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Matthias Greiml & Florian Fritz & Josef Steinegger & Theresa Schlömicher & Nicholas Wolf Williams & Negar Zaghi & Thomas Kienberger, 2022. "Modelling and Simulation/Optimization of Austria’s National Multi-Energy System with a High Degree of Spatial and Temporal Resolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-33, May.
    10. Min-Hwi Kim & Deuk-Won Kim & Dong-Won Lee, 2021. "Feasibility of Low Carbon Renewable Energy City Integrated with Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Liu, Yongzhong, 2022. "A multi-objective approach to determine time series aggregation strategies for optimal design of multi-energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Galleguillos-Pozo, R. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2021. "Design of stand-alone electrification systems using fuzzy mathematical programming approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Rasmus Magni Johannsen & Poul Alberg Østergaard & David Maya-Drysdale & Louise Krog Elmegaard Mouritsen, 2021. "Designing Tools for Energy System Scenario Making in Municipal Energy Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Kainthola, Jyoti & Kalamdhad, Ajay S. & Goud, Vaibhav V., 2020. "Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1352-1359.
    15. Onodera, Hiroaki & Delage, Rémi & Nakata, Toshihiko, 2024. "The role of regional renewable energy integration in electricity decarbonization—A case study of Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    16. Chen, Yi-kuang & Jensen, Ida Græsted & Kirkerud, Jon Gustav & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2021. "Impact of fossil-free decentralized heating on northern European renewable energy deployment and the power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Backe, Stian & Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Schwabeneder, Daniel & Auer, Hans & Korpås, Magnus & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2022. "Impact of energy communities on the European electricity and heating system decarbonization pathway: Comparing local and global flexibility responses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    18. Zielinski, Michał & Myszkowski, Adam & Pelic, Marcin & Staniek, Roman, 2022. "Low-speed radial piston pump as an effective alternative power transmission for small hydropower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1012-1027.
    19. Fazlur Rashid & Md. Emdadul Hoque & Muhammad Aziz & Talukdar Nazmus Sakib & Md. Tariqul Islam & Raihan Moker Robin, 2021. "Investigation of Optimal Hybrid Energy Systems Using Available Energy Sources in a Rural Area of Bangladesh," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Adamu, Haruna & Bello, Usman & Yuguda, Abubakar Umar & Tafida, Usman Ibrahim & Jalam, Abdullahi Mohammad & Sabo, Ahmed & Qamar, Mohammad, 2023. "Production processes, techno-economic and policy challenges of bioenergy production from fruit and vegetable wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6433-:d:1444179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.