IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11573-d1203299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biochemical Methane Potential Assays for Organic Wastes as an Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Miguel Cabrita

    (Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria Teresa Santos

    (Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal
    CERNAS-Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion process is applied worldwide in the treatment of various organic wastes, allowing energy production from biogas and organic recovery from digested sludge. In the evaluation of suitable substrates for anaerobic digestion, Biochemical Methane Potential assays are the most applied, and, despite several efforts to standardize this method, it is observed that there are still several studies that do not apply all the criteria. This current paper’s main goal is to present a review of anaerobic feedstocks, BMP methodologies, experimental conditions, and results of specific methane production from 2008 to 2023. A wide range of anaerobic feedstocks was found, which was divided into five groups: animal manure, sludge, food wastes, energy crops, and other organic wastes. Several parameters were used to characterize the anaerobic feedstocks, like TS, VS, COD, and pH, displaying different value ranges. The number of publications concerning BMP assays increased significantly over the years until 2021, having stabilized in the last two years. This evolution allowed for several attempts to standardize the BMP method with positive developments, but there are still some gaps in the experimental conditions and the determination of specific methane production. All of this makes the comparison of some studies a challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Miguel Cabrita & Maria Teresa Santos, 2023. "Biochemical Methane Potential Assays for Organic Wastes as an Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11573-:d:1203299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhinav Choudhury & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Co-Digestion of Gummy Waste with a Food Waste, Grease Waste, and Dairy Manure Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Mirmasoumi, Siamak & Ebrahimi, Sirous & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti, 2018. "Enhancement of biogas production from sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant: Evaluation of pretreatment techniques and co-digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 707-717.
    3. Salehiyoun, Ahmad Reza & Di Maria, Francesco & Sharifi, Mohammad & Norouzi, Omid & Zilouei, Hamid & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2020. "Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and slaughterhouse waste in existing wastewater digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2503-2509.
    4. Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2013. "Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-177.
    5. Natalia Mioduszewska & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski, 2020. "The Influence of the Process of Sugar Beet Storage on Its Biochemical Methane Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    7. Yong, Zihan & Dong, Yulin & Zhang, Xu & Tan, Tianwei, 2015. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 527-530.
    8. María Eugenia Beily & Brian Jonathan Young & Patricia Alina Bres & Nicolás Iván Riera & Wenguo Wang & Diana Elvira Crespo & Dimitrios Komilis, 2023. "Relationships among Physicochemical, Microbiological, and Parasitological Parameters, Ecotoxicity, and Biochemical Methane Potential of Pig Slurry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charalampos Toufexis & Dimitrios-Orfeas Makris & Christos Vlachokostas & Alexandra V. Michailidou & Christos Mertzanakis & Athanasia Vachtsiavanou, 2024. "Bridging the Gap between Biowaste and Biomethane Production: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Methodological Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Peter Onu & Anup Pradhan, 2024. "Investigating the Energy Potential and Degradation Kinetics of Nine Organic Substrates: Promulgating Sustainability in Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derick Lima & Gregory Appleby & Li Li, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    4. Czekała, Wojciech & Łukomska, Aleksandra & Pulka, Jakub & Bojarski, Wiktor & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Oniszczuk, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Waste-to-energy: Biogas potential of waste from coffee production and consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Aisha Al-Rumaihi & Gordon McKay & Hamish R. Mackey & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2020. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Food Waste Management Using Two Composting Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Kristiana Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Transitioning to Clean Energy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Renewable Electricity Generation in the EU-27," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Triolo, Jin M. & Ward, Alastair J. & Pedersen, Lene & Løkke, Mette M. & Qu, Haiyan & Sommer, Sven G., 2014. "Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of plant biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 52-57.
    8. O’Shea, Richard & Kilgallon, Ian & Wall, David & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Quantification and location of a renewable gas industry based on digestion of wastes in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 229-239.
    9. Santagata, R. & Ripa, M. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "An environmental assessment of electricity production from slaughterhouse residues. Linking urban, industrial and waste management systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 175-188.
    10. Kumar, Aman & Singh, Ekta & Mishra, Rahul & Lo, Shang Lien & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Global trends in municipal solid waste treatment technologies through the lens of sustainable energy development opportunity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    11. Kwon, Gihoon & Tsang, Daniel C.W. & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Pyrolysis of aquatic carbohydrates using CO2 as reactive gas medium: A case study of chitin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 136-143.
    12. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Pozarlik, A.K. & Bramer, E.A. & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, H. & Brem, G., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomass from nitrogen and phosphorus approach: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 401-415.
    13. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    14. Eleni Iacovidou & Jonathan Busch & John N. Hahladakis & Helen Baxter & Kok Siew Ng & Ben M. J. Herbert, 2017. "A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Allen, Eoin & Wall, David M. & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "A detailed assessment of resource of biomethane from first, second and third generation substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 656-665.
    16. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Bogdan Saletnik & Marcin Fiedur & Radosław Kwarciany & Grzegorz Zaguła & Marcin Bajcar, 2024. "Pyrolysis as a Method for Processing of Waste from Production of Cultivated Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    19. Constantin Stan & Gerardo Collaguazo & Constantin Streche & Tiberiu Apostol & Diana Mariana Cocarta, 2018. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of the OFMSW: Improving Biogas Production and Startup," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Pirmoradi, Neda & Ghaneian, Mohammad Taghi & Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan & Salmani, Mohammad Hossein & Hatami, Behnam, 2021. "The conversion of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater sludge into biodiesel: Process modeling and optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1236-1249.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11573-:d:1203299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.