IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5457-d1423313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioethical Analysis of the Socio-Environmental Conflicts of a Pig Industry on a Chilean Rural Community

Author

Listed:
  • María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada

    (Programa de Epidemiología, Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile)

  • Paulo Pasten

    (Programa de Especialidad Médica de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile)

  • Natalia Landeros

    (Centro Oncológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Cristian Valdés

    (Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
    Escuela de Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Centro de Biotecnología de los Recursos Naturales (Cenbio), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Liliana Zúñiga-Venegas

    (Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
    Laboratorio de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Benjamín Castillo

    (Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Boris Lucero

    (Centro de Investigación en Neuropsicología y Neurociencias Cognitivas CINPSI Neurocog, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Alexis Castillo

    (Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile)

  • Rafael Junqueira Buralli

    (Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Environmental conflicts, particularly within the pig industry in Chile, pose serious ecological, social, and economic challenges. This study focuses on analyzing the bioethical aspects of the ongoing environmental conflicts at an industrial pig farm in the Maule Region’s rural localities. Employing heuristic and hermeneutic methodologies, the research analyzed over 790 documents, such as environment agency reports, legislation, and community testimonials. The findings underscore severe environmental harm, highlighted by air and water pollution caused by waste and emissions from pig farms. These environmental issues correlate with significant health problems in the community, including respiratory diseases and psychological stress. Furthermore, the study outlines the socio-economic repercussions, such as unsustainable water use and the detrimental impacts on local agriculture and livelihoods. The findings advocate for the enhanced management of natural resources, further scientific investigation, and the adoption of sustainable practices to ensure environmental justice and improve the well-being of impacted communities.

Suggested Citation

  • María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada & Paulo Pasten & Natalia Landeros & Cristian Valdés & Liliana Zúñiga-Venegas & Benjamín Castillo & Boris Lucero & Alexis Castillo & Rafael Junqueira Buralli, 2024. "Bioethical Analysis of the Socio-Environmental Conflicts of a Pig Industry on a Chilean Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5457-:d:1423313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajeev C Patel, 2012. "Food Sovereignty: Power, Gender, and the Right to Food," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-4, June.
    2. Roberto Pasetto & Benedetta Mattioli & Daniela Marsili, 2019. "Environmental Justice in Industrially Contaminated Sites. A Review of Scientific Evidence in the WHO European Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo Serra Borsatto & Vanilde Ferreira Souza-Esquerdo & Henrique Carmona Duval & Fernando Silveira Franco & Fabio Grigoletto, 2022. "Winning hearts and minds through a policy promoting the agroecological paradigm in universities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 5-18, March.
    2. Neier, Thomas, 2023. "The green divide: A spatial analysis of segregation-based environmental inequality in Vienna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Mark Christopher Navin & J. M. Dieterle, 2018. "Cooptation or solidarity: food sovereignty in the developed world," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 319-329, June.
    4. Agnieszka Genowska & Birute Strukcinskiene & Jacek Jamiołkowski & Paweł Abramowicz & Jerzy Konstantynowicz, 2023. "Emission of Industrial Air Pollution and Mortality Due to Respiratory Diseases: A Birth Cohort Study in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Caroline Hambloch & Kai Mausch & Costanza Conti & Andy Hall, 2023. "Simple solutions for complex problems? What is missing in agriculture for nutrition interventions," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 363-379, April.
    6. Jonathan Fairburn & Steffen Andreas Schüle & Stefanie Dreger & Lisa Karla Hilz & Gabriele Bolte, 2019. "Social Inequalities in Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution: A Systematic Review in the WHO European Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Jelonia T. Rumph & Victoria R. Stephens & Joanie L. Martin & LaKendria K. Brown & Portia L. Thomas & Ayorinde Cooley & Kevin G. Osteen & Kaylon L. Bruner-Tran, 2022. "Uncovering Evidence: Associations between Environmental Contaminants and Disparities in Women’s Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Danielle Sinnett & Isabelle Bray & Gergő Baranyi & Matthias Braubach & Sinaia Netanyanhu, 2022. "Systematic Review of the Health and Equity Impacts of Remediation and Redevelopment of Contaminated Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Shauntice Allen & Michelle V. Fanucchi & Lisa C. McCormick & Kristina M. Zierold, 2019. "The Search for Environmental Justice: The Story of North Birmingham," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Virginia Vallejo-Rojas & Marta G. Rivera-Ferre & Federica Ravera, 2022. "The agri-food system (re)configuration: the case study of an agroecological network in the Ecuadorian Andes," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1301-1327, December.
    11. Koen Dekeyser & Lise Korsten & Lorenzo Fioramonti, 2018. "Food sovereignty: shifting debates on democratic food governance," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(1), pages 223-233, February.
    12. Agnieszka Zwirowicz-Rutkowska & Joanna Nowak Da Costa & Andrzej Muczyński, 2023. "Managing Health Concerns Related to Post-Industrial Sites Redevelopment: A Warsaw, Poland Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Orozco-Meléndez, José Francisco & Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime, 2022. "A role for grassroots innovation toward agroecological transitions in the Global South? Evidence from Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Franklin Bailey Norwood & Glynn Tonsor & Jayson L Lusk, 2019. "I Will Give You My Vote but Not My Money: Preferences for Public versus Private Action in Addressing Social Issues," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 96-132, March.
    15. Usha Dahal & Triin Veber & Daniel Oudin Åström & Tanel Tamm & Leena Albreht & Erik Teinemaa & Kati Orru & Hans Orru, 2022. "Perinatal Health Inequalities in the Industrial Region of Estonia: A Birth Registry-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Kiran Asher & Annie Shattuck, 2017. "Forests and Food Security: What’s Gender Got to Do with It?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Yuliang Jiang & Yufeng Yang, 2022. "Environmental Justice in Greater Los Angeles: Impacts of Spatial and Ethnic Factors on Residents’ Socioeconomic and Health Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, April.
    18. Jenderedjian, Anna & Bellows, Anne C., 2019. "Addressing food and nutrition security from a human rights-based perspective: A mixed-methods study of NGOs in post-Soviet Armenia and Georgia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 46-56.
    19. Brionna Colson-Fearon & H. Shellae Versey, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as a Means to Food Sovereignty? A Case Study of Baltimore City Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Alina Maciejewska & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska, 2023. "Lack of Spatial Planning as a Cause of Environmental Injustice in the Context of the Provision of Health Safety to Urban Residents Based on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5457-:d:1423313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.