IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4806-d1409065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progressing toward Teal Organizations: An Assessment of Organizational Innovation in the Spanish Public Administrations

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz

    (Department of Organization Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, High Technical School of Industrial Engineers, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana Moreno Romero

    (Department of Organization Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, High Technical School of Industrial Engineers, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Organizational innovation can be a promising path for public administrations to follow to become more supportive of the realization of sustainability goals. With the Teal Organizations framework as a reference, this study explores organizational innovation in Spanish public administrations by assessing the extent and patterns of the implementation of selected innovative organizational practices, with the aim to help them improve. This study performs multivariate and individual analyses of the variance and factor analysis of the responses given by Spanish public sector employees to an online questionnaire about the degree of implementation of certain practices in their organization. The results show that there are little differences in the degree of implementation of these practices among the national, regional, and local administrations and that this implementation does not seem to be guided by the three principles of Teal Organizations: self-management, wholeness, and evolutionary purpose, but by five factors combining them, labeled as trust, task assignment, meetings management, hierarchy, and community and values. Because of the low degree of implementation of the practices under the community and values factor and the comparatively low effort required to introduce them, these practices appear as interesting options to explore when considering administrative reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz & Ana Moreno Romero, 2024. "Progressing toward Teal Organizations: An Assessment of Organizational Innovation in the Spanish Public Administrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4806-:d:1409065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Rzepka, 2021. "TEAL Organizations in Times of Industry 4.0," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 60-71.
    2. John Horn, 1965. "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 179-185, June.
    3. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    4. Ryszard Borowiecki & Zbigniew Olesinski & Agnieszka Rzepka & Katarzyna Hys, 2021. "Development of Teal Organisations in Economy 4.0: An Empirical Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 117-129.
    5. Ana Moreno Romero & Ángel Uruburu & Ajay K. Jain & Manuel Acevedo Ruiz & Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz, 2020. "The Path towards Evolutionary—Teal Organizations: A Relationship Trigger on Collaborative Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Jasna Mesarić & Diana Šimić & Milica Katić & Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås & Dag Hofoss & Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik, 2020. "The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian version," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    4. Hamed Taherdoost & Shamsul Sahibuddin & Neda Jalaliyoon, 2014. "Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory," Post-Print hal-02557344, HAL.
    5. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Jens Jirschitzka & Aileen Oeberst & Richard Göllner & Ulrike Cress, 2017. "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1059-1092, November.
    7. Stefan Schulenberg & Amanda Melton, 2010. "A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 95-111, March.
    8. Tamara Gajić & Dragan Vukolić & Jovan Bugarčić & Filip Đoković & Ana Spasojević & Snežana Knežević & Jelena Đorđević Boljanović & Slobodan Glišić & Stefana Matović & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2024. "The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Serbian Hospitality: A Potential Path to Sustainable Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Sati Bozkurt & Gizem B. Ekitli & Christopher L. Thomas & Jerrell C. Cassady, 2017. "Validation of the Turkish Version of the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale–Revised," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    10. Lambert, Stephanie A. & Herbert, Ian P. & Rothwell, Andrew T., 2020. "Rethinking the Career Anchors Inventory framework with insights from a finance transformation field study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    11. Venus, Thomas J. & Drabik, Dusan & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-67.
    12. Hannah Han & Fan Yang & Sarah Murray & Gaspar Mbita & Maggie Bangser & Katherine Rucinski & Albert Komba & Caterina Casalini & Mary Drake & Esther Majani & Kelly Curran & Yeronimo Mlawa & Agnes Junga , 2021. "Characterizing a sexual health and HIV risk stratification scale for sexually active adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Agyeman, Stephen & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-85.
    14. Henner Gimpel & Tobias Manner-Romberg & Fabian Schmied & Till J. Winkler, 2021. "Understanding the evaluation of mHealth app features based on a cross-country Kano analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 765-794, December.
    15. Jed A. Long & Jinhyung Lee & Darja Reuschke, 2023. "Activity graphs: Spatial graphs as a framework for quantifying individual mobility," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 377-402, July.
    16. Lau Lilleholt & Ingo Zettler & Cornelia Betsch & Robert Böhm, 2023. "Development and validation of the pandemic fatigue scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. David Říha & Timothy Heinze & Michael Stros, 2017. "Intercultural Variations in Personal Sales Factors in the Czech and U.S. Automotive Markets: Practical Implications for Marketing," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(1), pages 26-47.
    18. Andrea C Vial & Janine Bosak & Patrick C Flood & John F Dovidio, 2021. "Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Maria Lidia Mascia & Mirian Agus & Łukasz Tomczyk & Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio & Diego Bellini & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2023. "Smartphone Distraction: Italian Validation of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Patrick Hylton & Ben Kisby & Paul Goddard, 2018. "Young People’s Citizen Identities: A Q-Methodological Analysis of English Youth Perceptions of Citizenship in Britain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4806-:d:1409065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.