IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3172-d1373312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Serbian Hospitality: A Potential Path to Sustainable Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Gajić

    (Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
    Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism, University of Kragujevac, 36210 Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia)

  • Dragan Vukolić

    (Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism, University of Kragujevac, 36210 Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia
    Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Business Studies, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Jovan Bugarčić

    (Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism, University of Kragujevac, 36210 Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia)

  • Filip Đoković

    (Faculty of Organizational Studies—EDUKA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ana Spasojević

    (Department for International Cooperation, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Snežana Knežević

    (Department of Medical Studies, Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jelena Đorđević Boljanović

    (Faculty of Organizational Studies—EDUKA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Slobodan Glišić

    (Academy of Professional Studies South Serbia, 16000 Leskovac, Serbia)

  • Stefana Matović

    (Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Lóránt Dénes Dávid

    (Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, HU-6000 Kecskemét, Hungary
    Department of Sustainable Tourism, Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), HU-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions of employees in the hotel industry of the Republic of Serbia regarding the acceptance and importance of artificial intelligence (AI). Through a modified UTAUT model and the application of structural equation analysis (SEM), we investigated the key factors shaping AI acceptance. Research results show that behavioral intention and habit show a significant positive impact on AI usage behavior, while facilitating conditions have a limited but measurable impact on behavioral intention. Other factors, including social influence, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy, and effort expectancy, have minimal influence on the examined variables. The analysis reveals the crucial mediating role of behavioral intention, effectively bridging the gap between various predictors and AI usage behavior, thereby highlighting its significance in the broader context of technology adoption in the hotel industry. The primary goal of the study, which closes significant research gaps, as well as the manner in which it uses a specific model and statistical analysis to accomplish this goal, shows how innovative the work is. This method not only broadens the field’s understanding but also offers valuable insights for shaping sustainable development practices in the hospitality sector in the Republic of Serbia.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Gajić & Dragan Vukolić & Jovan Bugarčić & Filip Đoković & Ana Spasojević & Snežana Knežević & Jelena Đorđević Boljanović & Slobodan Glišić & Stefana Matović & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2024. "The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Serbian Hospitality: A Potential Path to Sustainable Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3172-:d:1373312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Vinh Nhat & Capezio, Alessandra & Restubog, Simon Lloyd D. & Garcia, Patrick R.J.M. & Wang, Lu, 2016. "In pursuit of service excellence: Investigating the role of psychological contracts and organizational identification of frontline hotel employees," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 8-19.
    2. Alaa M. Momani, 2020. "The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A New Approach in Technology Acceptance," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 79-98, July.
    3. Verhoef, Peter C. & Stephen, Andrew T. & Kannan, P.K. & Luo, Xueming & Abhishek, Vibhanshu & Andrews, Michelle & Bart, Yakov & Datta, Hannes & Fong, Nathan & Hoffman, Donna L. & Hu, Mandy Mantian & No, 2017. "Consumer Connectivity in a Complex, Technology-enabled, and Mobile-oriented World with Smart Products," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-8.
    4. John Horn, 1965. "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(2), pages 179-185, June.
    5. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    6. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    7. Sahu, Aditya Kumar & Padhy, R.K. & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: A systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 145-159.
    8. Albahri, A.S. & Alnoor, Alhamzah & Zaidan, A.A. & Albahri, O.S. & Hameed, Hamsa & Zaidan, B.B. & Peh, S.S. & Zain, A.B. & Siraj, S.B. & Alamoodi, A.H. & Yass, A.A., 2021. "Based on the multi-assessment model: Towards a new context of combining the artificial neural network and structural equation modelling: A review," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).
    9. Li Yang & Tony L. Henthorne & Babu George, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Technology in the Hospitality Industry: Current Applications and Future Trends," Springer Books, in: Babu George & Justin Paul (ed.), Digital Transformation in Business and Society, chapter 0, pages 211-228, Springer.
    10. Zhong, Lina & Verma, Rohit & Wei, Wenqi & Morrsion, Alastair M. & Yang, Liyu, 2022. "Multi-stakeholder perspectives on the impacts of service robots in urban hotel rooms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Dragan Vukolić & Tamara Gajić & Marko D. Petrović & Jovan Bugarčić & Ana Spasojević & Sonja Veljović & Nikola Vuksanović & Marina Bugarčić & Miloš Zrnić & Snežana Knežević & Sandra R. Rakić & Bojana D, 2023. "Development of the Concept of Sustainable Agro-Tourism Destinations—Exploring the Motivations of Serbian Gastro-Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Ricardo Vinuesa & Hossein Azizpour & Iolanda Leite & Madeline Balaam & Virginia Dignum & Sami Domisch & Anna Felländer & Simone Daniela Langhans & Max Tegmark & Francesco Fuso Nerini, 2020. "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Tamara Gajić & Ivana Blešić & Marko D. Petrović & Milan M. Radovanović & Filip Đoković & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Sanja Kovačić & Ivana Jošanov Vrgović & Tatyana N. Tretyakova & Julia A. Syromiatniko, 2023. "Stereotypes and Prejudices as (Non) Attractors for Willingness to Revisit Tourist-Spatial Hotspots in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Gąsior, 2021. "Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online—Classification Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    3. Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Jasna Mesarić & Diana Šimić & Milica Katić & Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås & Dag Hofoss & Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik, 2020. "The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian version," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Lars Meyer-Waarden & Julien Cloarec, 2022. "“Baby, you can drive my car”: Psychological antecedents that drive consumers’ adoption of AI-powered autonomous vehicles," Post-Print hal-03385891, HAL.
    7. Rahmani, Amir & Aboojafari, Roohallah & Bonyadi Naeini, Ali & Mashayekh, Javad, 2024. "Adoption of digital innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability in the metal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    9. Valerie Graf-Drasch & Maximilian Röglinger & Annette Wenninger & Sabiölla Hosseini, 2022. "A Contextualized Acceptance Model for Proactive Smart Services," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 345-387, September.
    10. Hamed Taherdoost & Shamsul Sahibuddin & Neda Jalaliyoon, 2014. "Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory," Post-Print hal-02557344, HAL.
    11. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Jens Jirschitzka & Aileen Oeberst & Richard Göllner & Ulrike Cress, 2017. "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1059-1092, November.
    13. Stefan Schulenberg & Amanda Melton, 2010. "A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 95-111, March.
    14. Sati Bozkurt & Gizem B. Ekitli & Christopher L. Thomas & Jerrell C. Cassady, 2017. "Validation of the Turkish Version of the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale–Revised," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    15. Lambert, Stephanie A. & Herbert, Ian P. & Rothwell, Andrew T., 2020. "Rethinking the Career Anchors Inventory framework with insights from a finance transformation field study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    16. Venus, Thomas J. & Drabik, Dusan & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-67.
    17. Hannah Han & Fan Yang & Sarah Murray & Gaspar Mbita & Maggie Bangser & Katherine Rucinski & Albert Komba & Caterina Casalini & Mary Drake & Esther Majani & Kelly Curran & Yeronimo Mlawa & Agnes Junga , 2021. "Characterizing a sexual health and HIV risk stratification scale for sexually active adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz & Ana Moreno Romero, 2024. "Progressing toward Teal Organizations: An Assessment of Organizational Innovation in the Spanish Public Administrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Agyeman, Stephen & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-85.
    20. Ruparel, Namita & Dhir, Amandeep & Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Islam, Jamid Ul, 2020. "The influence of online professional social media in human resource management: A systematic literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3172-:d:1373312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.