IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4658-d1405635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Suwatchai Denfanapapol

    (College of Politics and Governance, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)

  • Prasongchai Setthasuravich

    (Data Innovation and Public Policy Engineering Research Unit, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)

  • Surapong Rattanakul

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Aphisit Pukdeewut

    (College of Politics and Governance, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)

  • Hironori Kato

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

Abstract

Collaborative environmental governance (CEG) is a tripartite process that engages the government, private sector, and general public in decision-making related to environmental challenges, focusing on fostering more sustainable and efficient solutions. Understanding the specific factors influencing the degree of CEG presents a significant challenge, particularly in developing countries. This study aims to identify and assess the socio-economic determinants affecting the degree of CEG in Thailand, a representative developing country. Utilizing robust panel data models, which are well-suited to handle the complex variability of socio-economic factors, we analyzed provincial-level data from 2017 and 2019. Our findings revealed the associations between the degree of CEG and variables such as the internet access divide, economic activities, income inequality, and budget allocations for environmental activities. This research fills critical gaps in our understanding of how these determinants shape collaborative governance efforts, offering novel insights that challenge existing paradigms and providing actionable recommendations for policymakers striving to enhance environmental governance in developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Suwatchai Denfanapapol & Prasongchai Setthasuravich & Surapong Rattanakul & Aphisit Pukdeewut & Hironori Kato, 2024. "The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4658-:d:1405635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12264 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12262 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Fatimah Binti Kari & Hasanul Banna & Md. Khaled Saifullah, 2018. "Does income inequality affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from the ASEAN-5," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 213-228, April.
    4. Siv Vangen & John Paul Hayes & Chris Cornforth, 2015. "Governing Cross-Sector, Inter-Organizational Collaborations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1237-1260, October.
    5. John A. List & W. Warren McHone, 2000. "Ranking State Environmental Outputs: Evidence from Panel Data," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 23-39.
    6. Brousseau, Eric & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Jouvet, Pierre-Andre & Willinger, Marc (ed.), 2012. "Global Environmental Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199656202.
    7. Elaine van Tol Smit & Rob de Loë & Ryan Plummer, 2015. "How knowledge is used in collaborative environmental governance: water classification in New Brunswick, Canada," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 423-444, March.
    8. Christophe Boschet & Tina Rambonilaza, 2018. "Collaborative environmental governance and transaction costs in partnerships: evidence from a social network approach to water management in France," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 105-123, January.
    9. Forsyth, Tim, 2006. "Cooperative environmental governance and waste-to-energy technologies in Asia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4718, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Knack, Stephen & Kropf, Martha, 1998. "For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting," MPRA Paper 27258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Feng-Jenq Lin, 2008. "Solving Multicollinearity in the Process of Fitting Regression Model Using the Nested Estimate Procedure," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 417-426, June.
    12. Karin Ingold & Peter P.J. Driessen & Hens A.C. Runhaar & Alexander Widmer, 2019. "On the necessity of connectivity: linking key characteristics of environmental problems with governance modes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(11), pages 1821-1844, September.
    13. Setthasuravich, Prasongchai & Kato, Hironori, 2020. "The mediating role of the digital divide in outcomes of short-term transportation policy in Thailand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 161-171.
    14. Eero Palmujoki, 2006. "Public–Private Governance Patterns and Environmental Sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouela Mandalaki & Marianna Fotaki, 2020. "The Bodies of the Commons: Towards a Relational Embodied Ethics of the Commons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 745-760, November.
    2. Woods, David D., 2015. "Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 5-9.
    3. Nathalie Meißner & Etti Winter, 2019. "Design principles for protected area certificates: a case study on strategic investor groups," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 303-329, February.
    4. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    5. Tom Dedeurwaerdere, 2013. "Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science at Higher Education Institutions: Science Policy Tools for Incremental Institutional Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Héloïse Berkowitz, 2023. "From organizations as systems of ocean destruction to organizations as systems of ocean thriving," Post-Print hal-04005729, HAL.
    7. David D. Woods, 2018. "The theory of graceful extensibility: basic rules that govern adaptive systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 433-457, December.
    8. Bréchet, Thierry & Hritonenko, Natali & Yatsenko, Yuri, 2016. "Domestic environmental policy and international cooperation for global commons," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 183-205.
    9. Coleman, S., 2010. "Russian Election Reform and the Effect of Social Conformity on Voting and the Party System: 2007 and 2008," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 5, pages 73-90.
    10. Christopher Decker & John Maxwell, 2012. "Environmental inspection proclivity and state manufacturing growth: the US Experience from the 1990s," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(1), pages 263-282, February.
    11. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter & Phillips, Richard, 2017. "‘Branching scenarios’ seeking articulated action for regional regeneration – A case study of limited success," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 189-202.
    12. Pietro Previtali & Eugenio Salvati, 2021. "Area Social Plans and Local Governance of Interorganizational Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Peter Dithan Ntale & Jude Ssempebwa & Badiru Musisi & Genza Gyaviira Musoke & Kimoga Joseph & C. B. Mugimu & Ngoma Muhammed & Joseph Ntayi, 2020. "Gaps in the structuring of organizations in the graduate employment context in Uganda," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Coleman, Stephen, 2005. "Testing Theories with Qualitative and Quantitative Predictions," MPRA Paper 105171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Joon Sik Kim & Peter W. J. Batey & Yanting Fan & Sheng Zhong, 2021. "Embracing integrated watershed revitalization in Suzhou, China: learning from global case studies," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 565-595, June.
    16. Coleman, Stephen, 2014. "Evolution of the Russian Political Party System under the Influence of Social Conformity: 1993-2011," MPRA Paper 59038, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Montini, Anna, 2010. "Embedding the drivers of emission efficiency at regional level -- Analyses of NAMEA data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2457-2467, October.
    18. Zhang, Rui & Sharma, Rajesh & Tan, Zhixiong & Kautish, Pradeep, 2022. "Do export diversification and stock market development drive carbon intensity? The role of renewable energy solutions in top carbon emitter countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1318-1328.
    19. Sengupta, Pooja & Biswas, Baidyanath & Kumar, Ajay & Shankar, Ravi & Gupta, Shivam, 2021. "Examining the predictors of successful Airbnb bookings with Hurdle models: Evidence from Europe, Australia, USA and Asia-Pacific cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 538-554.
    20. Joon Sik Kim & Peter W. J. Batey, 2021. "Integrated watershed revitalization: the experience of the Mersey Basin Campaign," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 531-563, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4658-:d:1405635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.