IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04005729.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From organizations as systems of ocean destruction to organizations as systems of ocean thriving

Author

Listed:
  • Héloïse Berkowitz

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Despite growing awareness around human impacts on marine ecosystems, little action is taken to reduce the negative effects of organizations on the ocean, thus increasing risks of global collapse. In this paper, I argue that organizations act as systems of ocean destruction, and I explore how to operate a shift to organizations as systems of ocean conservation and thriving, enabling human-ocean socio-ecological coviability. To do so, I analyze the organizational affordances of the ocean: incommensurability, open access and complex property regimes, structural domination by humans and land, perceived inexhaustibility and cognitive distance. Then, based on the transdisciplinary analysis of mechanisms of ocean destruction, I discuss the constitution of ocean negative commons and the zombification process of the ocean. Lastly, I suggest alternative organizing principles that would allow to manage these commons and transform organizations to reconnect them with the ocean: degrowth, total responsibility, full cost allocation, ocean equity, and adaptive, place-based comanagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Héloïse Berkowitz, 2023. "From organizations as systems of ocean destruction to organizations as systems of ocean thriving," Post-Print hal-04005729, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04005729
    DOI: 10.1111/basr.12300
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04005729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04005729/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/basr.12300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12262 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brousseau, Eric & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Jouvet, Pierre-Andre & Willinger, Marc (ed.), 2012. "Global Environmental Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199656202.
    3. Michael V. Russo, 2003. "The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 317-331, April.
    4. Costanza, Robert & Andrade, Francisco & Antunes, Paula & van den Belt, Marjan & Boesch, Don & Boersma, Dee & Catarino, Fernando & Hanna, Susan & Limburg, Karin & Low, Bobbi, 1999. "Ecological economics and sustainable governance of the oceans," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 171-187, November.
    5. Guido Caniglia & C. Luederitz & T. Wirth & I. Fazey & B. Martín-López & K. Hondrila & A. König & H. Wehrden & N. A. Schäpke & M. D. Laubichler & D. J. Lang, 2021. "A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 93-100, February.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12264 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Antunes, Paula & Santos, Rui, 1999. "Integrated environmental management of the oceans," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 215-226, November.
    8. Eric Brousseau & Tom Dedeurwaerdere & Pierre-André Jouvet & Marc Willinger, 2012. "Introduction: Global Environmental Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms," Post-Print hal-01492342, HAL.
    9. Heazle, Michael, 2004. "Scientific uncertainty and the International Whaling Commission: an alternative perspective on the use of science in policy making," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 361-374, September.
    10. Lars Coenen & Bernhard Truffer, 2012. "Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 367-374, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Héloïse Berkowitz & Mathias Guérineau & Gaëlle Petit, 2023. "Life's evaluation: a blind spot of sustainable food systems transitions [Évaluer le vivant, angle mort des transitions des systèmes alimentaires]," Post-Print hal-04361332, HAL.
    2. Aurélien Acquier & Julie Mayer & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2024. "Anthropocène, limites planétaires et nouvelles frontières des sciences de gestion," Post-Print hal-04504417, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouela Mandalaki & Marianna Fotaki, 2020. "The Bodies of the Commons: Towards a Relational Embodied Ethics of the Commons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 745-760, November.
    2. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    3. Suwatchai Denfanapapol & Prasongchai Setthasuravich & Surapong Rattanakul & Aphisit Pukdeewut & Hironori Kato, 2024. "The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Woods, David D., 2015. "Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 5-9.
    5. Nathalie Meißner & Etti Winter, 2019. "Design principles for protected area certificates: a case study on strategic investor groups," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 303-329, February.
    6. Tom Dedeurwaerdere, 2013. "Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science at Higher Education Institutions: Science Policy Tools for Incremental Institutional Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Mark C. Freeman & Ben Groom & Richard Zeckhauser, 2015. "Better Predictions, Better Allocations: Scientific Advances and Adaptation to Climate Change," NBER Working Papers 21463, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Boesch, Donald F., 1999. "The role of science in ocean governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 189-198, November.
    9. David D. Woods, 2018. "The theory of graceful extensibility: basic rules that govern adaptive systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 433-457, December.
    10. Bréchet, Thierry & Hritonenko, Natali & Yatsenko, Yuri, 2016. "Domestic environmental policy and international cooperation for global commons," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 183-205.
    11. Barkley Rosser, J. Jr., 2001. "Complex ecologic-economic dynamics and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, April.
    12. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2022. "Neoliberalism and climate change: How the free-market myth has prevented climate action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Javier Martínez-del-Río & José Céspedes-Lorente, 2014. "Competitiveness and Legitimation: The Logic of Companies going Green in Geographical Clusters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 131-146, March.
    14. Artur Santoalha & Ron Boschma, 2021. "Diversifying in green technologies in European regions: does political support matter?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 182-195, February.
    15. Jens Koehrsen, 2017. "Boundary Bridging Arrangements: A Boundary Work Approach to Local Energy Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Karin Andrea Wigger & Dean A. Shepherd, 2020. "We’re All in the Same Boat: A Collective Model of Preserving and Accessing Nature-Based Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 587-617, May.
    17. Broto, Vanesa Castán, 2017. "Energy landscapes and urban trajectories towards sustainability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 755-764.
    18. Weigelt, Carmen & Lu, Shaohua & Verhaal, J. Cameron, 2021. "Blinded by the sun: The role of prosumers as niche actors in incumbent firms’ adoption of solar power during sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    19. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    20. Issaka Dialga, 2017. "Changing the Africa's impoverishing economic model: Towards a rewarding sustainable specialization model with a new factor of production," Working Papers halshs-01500431, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable ocean; eco-centric approach; ocean negative commons; ocean equity; Ocean governance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04005729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.